Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Separation with Parajumpers

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Separation with Parajumpers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jul 2014, 20:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Switzerland
Age: 39
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Separation with Parajumpers

Hello,

I have a question for all of you, in a Terminal control aerea of class D if you have at the same time IFR (approach or departure) and Parachute activity from FL130 (this level is actually outside the TMA) but landing on ground (inside the TMA), how would you provide separation for your IFR aircraft vs. the paras?

I would say that in a case like that you should stop on or the other activity until you have confirmation that all the jumpers are on ground or at least below the lowest level of the TMA. Please tell if I'm wrong but the only way to have an effective separation inside a controlled airspace, would be to create a segregated area where the paras can jump and keep the IFR at least 2.5 NM around?

In case instead the same situation happen outside the controlled airspace, like in airspace class E, the paras could jump from everywhere and it's responsibility of the PIC to avoid them?

Thank you.
spoon84 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 21:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 47
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airspace class E is also defined as controlled for parajumpers in Denmark at least.

You need a clearance to jump when jumping in A-E airspace, and that clearance will be given depending on traffic.

A controller can get away with only providing trafficinformation after he cleared the jump, no seperation is needed.

I guess most controllers won't like jumpers in the approach and departure sectors, and they most likely won't give the go, if they have known traffic heading towards the jumpers at a lower altitude.
jmmoric is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 14:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: London
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Separation

As long as you are 5,000 feet below you have separation from the para dropper !!
LadyAtco is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 06:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are not meat bombs classified as VFR? So traffic info in D?
Hempy is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 16:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have a special procedure published in AIP.

We have established paradropping areas.
FPL and entry clearance required.
When pilot reports ready to paradrop,and cleared to start by ATCO, 3nm or 5nm(depending on circumstances) radar separation from that area required and 1000ft above,until such time when 3 minutes passed after pilot reported paradrop completed.

Hope helps.
ron83 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 08:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: home
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does that work, 5,000' below something people are jumping out of???

UK has segregated para dropping areas where controlled airspace is involved. A/c remain clear of this unless overflying at all times that the para a/c is present.
BwatchGRUNT is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 20:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: solent-on-sea
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not quite. Nothing to stop underflying para a/c before jump. Done occasionally, though not often I grant you, at Headcorn, Hinton, etc..
Not Long Now is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2014, 21:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing worse having just left the a/c than seeing something approaching below!
Avoiding action in free fall is limited when going down at 100mph.

Been there, done it and don't want to do that again, thank you.
windowjob is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 15:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: London
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5000 below

B watch Grunt


It was a joke. You will never make A watch !!!


Spot the !!!!
LadyAtco is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.