PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?


ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 9th Jun 2012, 13:32   #1 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Desert
Posts: 1
Question Low Visibility T/O

Genuine doubt for ATC experts: Which is the spacing between the RWY center line lights before a displaced threshold on a CatIII aproved RWY? The FAA standards seems to give a possible selection between 30mts for approach lights and 15mts for take off, is this correct? Any supporting documents for this issue? Thanks!
coolatdesert is offline   Reply
Old 10th Jun 2012, 11:02   #2 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow
Age: 27
Posts: 1
For CATIII operations and take-off in RVR below 400m spacing should be 15m and no centerline lights before runway threshold lights.
CAP168 Licensing of Aerodromes, Chapter 6 page 18
Barman. is offline   Reply
Old 16th Jun 2012, 21:22   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 338
ICAO allows white approach light centreline barrettes at 30m spacing to be used pre-landing threshold for Cat III take-offs instead of 15m spaced runway centreline lights. Ref Annex 14, Chapter 5, page 55.
Musket90 is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".