PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?


ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 6th Sep 2011, 09:11   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 298
TG 916 Yesterday

Last night I was on the above, we were nicely established on finals, and we did a go-around. The Captain gave a brief explanation that I didn't understand.

Can anyone tell me the reason ?

Just out of interest, nothing else. I know this is nothing whatsoever unusual, like I say, just out of interest.

Ta
Will Hung is offline   Reply
Old 6th Sep 2011, 10:11   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 584
I assume you were pax, not the FO then.....??

What did the flight deck say then? maybe someone can decipher it.
Bright-Ling is offline   Reply
Old 6th Sep 2011, 10:35   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 68
Posts: 6,479
If you didn't hang around long after the go-around there was likely nothing wrong with the aeroplane..... probably the one ahead slow to clear the runway, which is often the reason.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is online now   Reply
Old 6th Sep 2011, 14:06   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,664
The briefer the explanation, the more likely the problem was up front Easiest to blame ATC whatever, but occasionally we get found out using that line

NoD
NigelOnDraft is online now   Reply
Old 6th Sep 2011, 16:38   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: LONDON England
Age: 41
Posts: 232
Told to maintain 160 to 4 but kept speed at close to 200, rapidly catching preceding traffic . Told to go around , continued decent until asked if going around as instructed, where upon go around initiated.
autothrottle is offline   Reply
Old 6th Sep 2011, 17:44   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 68
Posts: 6,479
"Ladies and gentlemen, this is the Captain. We're going around because I've made a right cock-up....."
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is online now   Reply
Old 6th Sep 2011, 17:55   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,933
Quote:
"Ladies and gentlemen, this is the Captain. We're going around because I've made a right cock-up....."
On the other hand I would be far more worried if a crew continued an approach which wasn't correctly stable by the required "gate".

The person who has never made a mistake never makes anything and there can be many factors which can conspire to occasionally cause a Go Around.

In the company I work for there is a "no blame" policy for Go Arounds which is the way it should be.
fireflybob is online now   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 08:20   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 298
Thanks autothrottle. Very informative. Interesting that the ground speed indicated on the cabin display was bang on 160. Firefly, agree 100% with the no-blame culture.

Ta
Will Hung is offline   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 08:30   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 68
Posts: 6,479
You say cabin info said 160kts but autothrottle said he was doing 200.....
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is online now   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 08:35   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 72
GROUNDSPEED of 160kts. The London airports yesterday afternoon were enjoying 3000ft winds of about 40-50 knots down the runway. Therefore the aircraft in front of you would most likely of been flying a groundspeed of 120kts!
rice.and.pea is offline   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 09:21   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: LONDON England
Age: 41
Posts: 232
correct Rice
autothrottle is offline   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 09:50   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Winchester.Hants.England
Posts: 411
Groundspeed ?

Are Approach speeds such as 160 to 4 not based on IAS anymore ?
Flybywyre is online now   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 10:25   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 72
Yes they are, 160kts IAS to 4 dme (see other recent thread). However the original poster said the info screen on the plane showed the aircraft flying a ground speed of 160 kts. Autothrottle mentioned the reason for the go-around was because the aircraft was still flying around 200kts IAS (with 40 knot headwind = 160 kts ground speed) with the preceding aircraft probably adhering to the 160kts IAS instruction (approx 120kts ground speed).
rice.and.pea is offline   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 12:29   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Yeovil
Age: 28
Posts: 214
autothrottle, a question if I may? In this situation is the standard go around instruction still issued? (Go around, I say again go around, acknowledge) or is more of a "this isn't going to work, would you mind going around?"
rich_g85 is offline   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 12:49   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 68
Posts: 6,479
<<would you mind going around>>

Hahahahaha!! ATC give instructions..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is online now   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 16:58   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 193
Quote:
HEATHROW DIRECTOR <<would you mind going around>>

Hahahahaha!! ATC give instructions..
You sound like one of my early OJTIs: "This is air traffic control boy, not air traffic ask very politely!"
reportyourlevel is online now   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 17:31   #17 (permalink)
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
"this isn't going to work, would you mind going around?"
If you do choose this approach I believe the correct phraseology is, in fact, "this isn't going to work, I say, would you mind awfully, going around?"
  Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 17:43   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 68
Posts: 6,479
Or as an ex-Heathrow colleague said: "I'm terribly sorry but GO-AROUND".
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is online now   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 18:34   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 63
Which got the reply "thank you, I could see we were catching him" (number 1 had slowed to walking pace)
windowjob is offline   Reply
Old 7th Sep 2011, 19:39   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitoon
If you do choose this approach I believe the correct phraseology is, in fact, "this isn't going to work, I say, would you mind awfully, going around?"
...or, if cambioso had been on AIR ARR, ...."I say, would you mind awfully, going around, Old Boy?"
Talkdownman is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".