PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st November 2009, 20:33   #1 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Iran-Tehran
Age: 28
Posts: 6
Question problem with ICAO definition of RADAR

Hi all,
the ICAO definition of RADAR is:
A radio detection device which provides information on range, azimuth and/or elevation of objects.
and the ICAO definition of elevation is:
The vertical distance of a point or a level, on or affixed to the surface of the earth, measured from mean sea level.

I find from this definitions that radar provides information only of the objects which are on the geround or affixed to the ground!
how can it be explained?

khashyatc is offline   Reply
Old 1st November 2009, 20:53   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 87
I reckon the "and/or" bit is your answer. In an ATC environment the radar only provides a range and azimuth.
Glamdring is offline   Reply
Old 1st November 2009, 21:11   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 26
PAR provides azimuth and elevation for a precision talk down. Also the old Type 82 radar as used at eastern radar and others had something known as stacked beams from which you were able to use and compare elevation(altitude) and provide separation of aircraft based on this information from your height finder. ie the target aircraft did not have to have SSR for the ATCO to provide a vertical separation provided both your aircraft and the unknown were able to provide a valid height from the radar system and they were different by at least 5000ft!! I believe this was because the radar was originally designed as a tracking radar for the bloodhound air ground missile.
stopbar is offline   Reply
Old 2nd November 2009, 01:56   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Age: 18
Posts: 47
I think you miss the point- the original definitions suggest that radar provides information on range, azimuth and/or elevation of objects

Where elevation has to be on or attached to the surface of the earth. Hopefully most pilots don't fly that way
Diaz is offline   Reply
Old 2nd November 2009, 05:10   #5 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Iran-Tehran
Age: 28
Posts: 6
don't u think that if in the definition of radar, instead of ELEVATION, LEVEL had been used, it was more correct?
khashyatc is offline   Reply
Old 2nd November 2009, 18:09   #6 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: slan
Age: 36
Posts: 2
Well how will this be explained ?:
"Elevation:The vertical distance of a point or a level, on or affixed to the surface of the earth, measured from mean sea level."
and
"Level: A generic term relating to the vertical position of an aircraft in flight and meaning variously, height,altitude or flight level."

How can level (vertical position of an aircraft in flight) be on or affixed to the surface of the earth ?
12caps is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".