PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th April 2008, 12:25   #1 (permalink)
PKPF68-77
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 297
METAR coding up in UK. Gust Speeds.

I believe that the half-hourly METARS use
wind direction
mean speed
gust speed

"taken for a period of several minutes just prior to the time of the observation".

Clearly, if you take this literally, this means that the highest gust speed since the last METAR (on a day of no "specials") may not be included.
However, some, or all of you may prefer to use the highest gust of the previous half hour? Be glad to hear your views.

I am asking this only to show that in a list of METARS I have for part of a day, the highest gust of the period may not be included.

Cheers, guys.

PS - Query is nothing whatsoever to do with an aviation matter - merely a minor land-based incident.

PKPF68-77 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2008, 12:34   #2 (permalink)
PPRuNe Tea Lady
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: A pyramid far far away
Posts: 64
I'm no longer current so stand to be corrected but I believe that gusts in the 10 minutes preceding the observation are included. Bear in mind that a full 'manual' observation ie no automatic readings can take up to 15 minutes to carry out and code up so yes its possible that the highest gust of the day might not be included in the METAR but ought to be recorded as a comment in the register.
cleo is offline   Reply
Old 16th April 2008, 14:27   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Most automated kit has a 2-minute or 10-minute 'average' setting, which will record the highest in that period, so your assumption that the highest gust could (and, technically, should) be ommitted from the METAR is correct.
matspart3 is offline   Reply
Old 16th April 2008, 15:16   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 297
Thanks for that, cleo and matspart3.

Looks like I will also have to purchase data from nearest anemometer site to Glasgow. (Bishopton if anyone is interested.)


Off at a tangent, now, we don't really know what the max gust at Hamburg was on the day of the hairy landing in Xwinds then? At least not from the list of METARS if same system is used in Europe.
PKPF68-77 is offline   Reply
Old 16th April 2008, 23:03   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the world
Posts: 167
As cleo said, the wind in a METAR is the 10 minute average preceeding the observation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAP 746 Meteorological Observations at Aerodromes
The surface wind direction and speed reported is the average taken over a ten minute period immediately preceding the time of the observation. The only exception is when a marked discontinuity occurs. This is defined as a change in the mean direction of 30 degrees or more with a mean speed of 10 knots or more before or after the change, or an increase or decrease in the wind speed of 10 knots or more, sustained for at least 2 minutes. In this case, the mean over this latter period shall be reported.
Dizzee Rascal is offline   Reply
Old 17th April 2008, 10:46   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 297
Thank you for that, diz.
PKPF68-77 is offline   Reply
Old 19th April 2008, 15:35   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: KPBI
Age: 30
Posts: 55
Off at a tangent, now, we don't really know what the max gust at Hamburg was on the day of the hairy landing in Xwinds then? At least not from the list of METARS if same system is used in Europe.

I don't have the METAR anymore, but I believe the max wind gust reported in the METARs was 49 knots near the time of the incident? Most likely the weather observing equipment records the peak wind speed and the time it occurred, but no, in European METARs the peak speak isn't reported unless it occurs in the 10 minutes preceding the observation.
datafox is offline   Reply
Old 19th April 2008, 15:53   #8 (permalink)
Spitoon
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,783
Continuing the tangent - the peak speak isn't reported unless it occurs in the 10 minutes preceding the observation and it is 10kts or more greater than the mean speed.

So, let us imagin that the METAR includes the wind group 27035G49 - it is quite possible that a substantially stronger gust, say 55kts, occurred 15 minutes before the time of the observation but it would not be mentioned in the METAR. (I don't know about other parts of the world but in the UK the days of entering such data in a register are long past.)

Of course, such a gust would almost certainly be reported by RTF to the pilot of an aircraft taking off or landing, but only if it occurred during the 2 minutes before the controller transmitted the message. Those are the rules anyway - many controllers that I know would augment the required wind reports with additional information in such conditions.

Spitoon is offline  
Reply
Old 19th April 2008, 23:24   #9 (permalink)
M609
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 6903.21N 01832.25E
Posts: 650
I use common sense when reading wind to aircraft. Sure, the 2 min wind at the thr is what I primarily use, but if it's a freak calm in prevailing winds I give crews a heads up as well. Likewise if the wind is calm at the airfield, but G30 at a hilltop 1 nm at 1100ft, I tell them that as well. No mention about that in the book, it just seems pertinent to do so.

M609 is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US RVR Jepp Coding C172s Tech Log 6 6th February 2008 22:20
LHR Arr/Dep and FMS Coding 737 classic Olendirk Tech Log 0 1st April 2007 13:45
Delay coding Golden Rivet Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch 22 12th December 2006 04:02
Coding days are here again..... Chaffers Jet Blast 10 26th February 2004 22:19
DVD Region coding sabretooth jockey Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting 7 11th December 2003 22:22


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".