PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?


ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th Sep 2007, 03:07   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Down under land
Posts: 289
Oz Atc R/t?

Could an OZ ATC'er explain why dunnunder they 'chunk' callsign numbers eg. "Qantas five eighteen" whereas all (I think) other ICAO states use individual numbers eg. "Qantas five one eight"? Is this a state variation? Reasons why? thanks
Watchdog is online now   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 04:03   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 596
G'day Watchdog,

It's in our AIP, we use 'group form' for callsigns as you noted, five eighteen instead of 5 1 8 and pretty much individual digits for everything else except for full 'hundreds' or full 'thousands', except QNH which is always digits.

There are three or four pages on "transmission of numbers" and of course most of it doesn't apply outside the Oz FIR.

A dog with a watch eh?

Regards,
BH.

(Not ATC but a long time Oz pilot.)
Bullethead is offline   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 04:39   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Down under land
Posts: 289
Thanks Bullet ....any idea why OZ dares to be different?
Watchdog is online now   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 04:55   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: On a different Island
Age: 41
Posts: 320
I believe that the change, about 7 years ago, when we forced the use of FLT No callsigns vs rego's; was to reduce flight number callsign confusion; i.e. 518, five eighteen, would sound different to 581, five eighty one.

But of course 518 sounds very close to 580, right?

I don't use group format when dealing with internationals unless they call on freq using the group format. But then most international (ozzie and yanks particularly) pilots tend to mix up between group and non grouped formats.
Blockla is offline   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 05:04   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The World
Posts: 47
So why not "fifty-one eight"??
Bldy Aussies!!
NDB Alpha is offline   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 05:43   #6 (permalink)
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Makes a change from pople complaining about the Brits going their own way!! Unless anyone thinks that Ozzie procedures are influenced by a couple of hundred years of history!
  Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 06:44   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: BIAP ORBI
Age: 52
Posts: 515
Snoop

Worlds best practice....that's why?

It must be the worlds best....because they keep saying it is!
divingduck is offline   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 07:44   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 68
Posts: 6,470
Yanks do it too. One particular frequency we used to handover to at Heathrow seemed to cause them problems - 135.12. American pilots often read it back as "thirty-five twelve" so I started to do that and it worked every time. A friend went to Chicago and heard a controller hand over to "One a quarter, a quarter". When he asked what that was he was told "125.25". All desperately naughty, of course.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline   Reply
Old 19th Sep 2007, 08:10   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 596
G'day Watchdog,

I wish I knew, before this iteration of the rules we were saying things like Flight Level two hundred instead of FL two zero zero and heading three hundred instead of three zero zero. Personally I prefer individual digits.

When I do an AKL return from SYD I do the group callsign thing and when I get to AKL it back to digits, then back to SYD etc etc. It's crazy.

Regards,
BH.
Bullethead is offline   Reply
Old 20th Sep 2007, 08:00   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: FL600-FL290
Posts: 58
We're permitted to group callsigns as well provided there is no room for confusion.
CDN_ATC is offline   Reply
Old 20th Sep 2007, 12:56   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: YYZ via the UK
Age: 38
Posts: 272
Even better, over here, when there are 3 or 4 same digits is saying "triple" or "quad"

ACA Triple 8 (888) or Jazz quad 7 (7777).

Helps when you have a mouth full of ulcers in cutting down RT. So long as there is no room for confusion seems to work OK.
Married a Canadian is offline   Reply
Old 20th Sep 2007, 13:51   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 90
I reckon the "group format" was introduced here in Oz sometime in 2003 around about the same time as Flight Number callsigns for domestics. I seem to recall that the initiative came from QANTAS at a forum of some sort and was quickly adopted as mentioned earlier under the guise of "World's best practice" IE because the Yanks did it it must be good.
The funny part is that the RAAF did not adopt it despite use of a common Manual of ATS. Things may have changed in the 2+ years since I retired!
J
jungmeister is offline   Reply
Old 20th Sep 2007, 16:01   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
In Sweden we say 'Flight Level three hundred, two hundred etc, not sure about the rest of Europe but definately different to what I was used to (permitted) in Melbourne.

Another thing I find interesting is that when speaking swedish we can say 'Bana tju-et' (pronounced shoo-et); the equivalent of saying Runway twentyone in english, but can't say Runway twentyone when speaking english, it's back to the usual 'Runway two-one'.
KrazyKangaroo is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2007, 00:04   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Over yonder
Posts: 25
Military seem to be the worst at alternating between group and single digits. If group format is not used at military aerodromes then that might be why?

WRT other traffic I'd certainly rather "Eastern twenty one eighty" than "Eastern two one eight zero".

Just my two cents worth.

RI
Ready Immediate is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".