PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?


ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th Aug 2007, 02:12   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2
Avoiding WX

Looking for info on what ATCO's are taught with regards to thunderstorm avoidance.

Do you expect to be asked permission or just informed?
360 right is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 03:18   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near water
Posts: 210
In general it is appreciated if you ask and also give your intentions i.e. left or right of track xx degrees for approx 40NM. Also do it well in advance, 20 miles or so. I will never refuse you to avoid Wx, but may level you off, if climbing or descending, for obvious reasons.

As for avoiding Wx into R, D or P airspace (active missile test range for example) a negative might be forthcoming: "If you avoid to the right you will die..." kinda thing, but an alternative will be suggested.
BlueSkye is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 06:57   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: southampton
Posts: 182
I would expect to be asked. I would never and will never stop you turning, but be aware that you maybe levelled off or "encouraged" to turn the other way. This would all be to avoid other traffic, last thing you need is an airmiss whilst avoiding.

Don't forget that WX avoidance is the thing that brings the highest workload for us. Your 20 degree turn to the right that is acknowlegded with a nice calm sounding "Turn approved" will be acompanied by a series of telephone calls as we coordinate you through other sectors, tell the mil and generally swear a bit.
1985 is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 07:00   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The South
Posts: 98
In the busy sectors in the Uk then we would like a heads-up before you deviate from your flight planned route or assigned heading.

Something simple like "Request right 15 degrees to avoid Wx"
If that suits the controller he will approve it & then will probably ask you how long you require that heading and to report when clear of the Wx.

Again once clear of the weather the controller would prefer a call to request re-joining your flight planned route, rather than just turning on your own. He may have other traffic also Wx avoiding that you need to remain on that heading against.

Wx avoiding is a very stressful time for ATC as the workload increases 10-fold. And as we can't see the weather on our radars at all then we are relying on the pilots to pass the info to us, so that we can try & help out other traffic behind you.

Basically communication between the pilots & ATC is the key to Wx avoidance.
DTY/LKS is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 07:47   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,058
At our Approach unit wx avoiding usually means leaving controlled airspace.That means change in radar service,watching out for 7000's or non squawking,military,gliders and all the rest in Class G.We have to use a lot of vertical separation,belt and braces.Best of all when there is a thunderstorm on 7 mile final and you can't see it on radar .I always want pilots to ask for wx avoidance but will not refuse.Gives me time to think of plan Z.
throw a dyce is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 09:01   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swanwick, England
Posts: 247
Plus, don't think we aren't wise to the old line of "Direct to xxxx would keep us clear".
MancBoy is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 09:05   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
And as we can't see the weather on our radars at all then we are relying on the pilots to pass the info to us, so that we can try & help out other traffic behind you.
Which is utterly crap for ATCO's and pilots alike.....I am no big fan of ATC in the states, but at least they can see the weather we see.
haughtney1 is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 09:57   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scandiland
Posts: 474
"Plus, don't think we aren't wise to the old line of "Direct to xxxx would keep us clear"."

Well, in some cases it's true. Is it harder for you guys to clear us direct to a point than to have us on a heading? With a point you know exactly where we are heading and which track we are going to make good. On a heading anything can happen so I would have thought this is a good solution whenever possible.

/LnS
low n' slow is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 10:31   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swanwick, England
Posts: 247
i was actually referring to an irish registered carrier who thinks that direct DUB would keep them clear

plus, i think it is better to use headings then i know exactly what you are doing so are therefore still in control
MancBoy is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 23:00   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: location, location
Posts: 35
As a Tower controller I hope I have an idea of when wx avoiding might be required, but I rely on the pilots telling me what they require and when as we have no idea of where the cells are.

It creates a lot of extra workload for the Tower as well (granted not as much as radar) but when every hold is blocked with all aircraft refusing to take-off due to a cell on climb-out, and they’re still landing, carnage ensues. So let us know nice and early what your requirements are and we’ll do our best to get you airborne asap.
Spangly is offline   Reply
Old 15th Aug 2007, 23:46   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2
Avoiding WX

Thanks for the info.

It's pretty much what I expected to hear but had doubts about recently because of some colleagues responses to the issue. Most pilots tend to ask but quite a few recently informed during or after the turn. Plus it seems to be different even within the same airlines.
It's a bit of a nerve wrecker after you've asked can the heading be kept and you see the aircraft turning off a heading in the useless direction 15Nm out without warning.
360 right is offline   Reply
Old 16th Aug 2007, 11:51   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Southampton
Posts: 298
If you have spotted a path between a couple of cells you can bet the guy coming the other way has seen the same gap and wants to go through it as well. Ask first and ask as early as possible.
Arkady is offline   Reply
Old 16th Aug 2007, 13:30   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scandiland
Posts: 474
"It's pretty much what I expected to hear but had doubts about recently because of some colleagues responses to the issue. Most pilots tend to ask but quite a few recently informed during or after the turn. Plus it seems to be different even within the same airlines."

I see this all the time in my airline. For me, above FL95 we're in controlled airspace and anything we want to do has to be cleared by you guys. But still it's some kind of understanding amongst a few guys that they can "borrow" a couple of degrees left or right wichever they prefer without telling anyone
Doesn't rhyme very well with my views but I'm just the co-pilot so what do I know...

/LnS
low n' slow is offline   Reply
Old 16th Aug 2007, 13:49   #14 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 1
Min separation in UK is 5 miles. TC is 3 miles. 2 aircraft on parallel headings 3.5 miles apart both borrow a few degrees without informing ATC. Could be interesting!
Not-a-virus is offline   Reply
Old 16th Aug 2007, 13:52   #15 (permalink)
Bellwether&cloudbuster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 251
Is slowing down speed wise ever used as a weather avoidance technique?
Julian Hensey is offline   Reply
Old 18th Aug 2007, 21:18   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: swanlake
Age: 43
Posts: 221
Deviation from normal track due wx is generally ok if told.....going left/ right and then asking or telling could be straight into an active danger area...or track separated traffic. we are here to help and would always seek to find you a solution.
45 before POL is offline   Reply
Old 19th Aug 2007, 10:05   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,075
Julian, I've never heard of an a/c asking to slow due to weather avoidance, just for turbulence or if weather at the destination has caused a backlog in the holds.

As I've said on weather avoidance threads before, always ask first. The London sectors are so tightly packed together now that unknown deviations can cause all kinds of trouble. The mass avoidance we had earlier in the year (discussed on another thread in here) proves the point exactly. We do flow our sectors when lots of weather is known so hopefully the frequencies shouldn't be too loaded, and taking a turn toward a rather large French danger area is the last thing I really want to try and co-ordinate, not having fighter control training and missing 3 Mirages going full tilt aint that easy.
5milesbaby is online now   Reply
Old 1st Sep 2007, 17:52   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 814
Just out of interest given that the industry is so highly technological why on earth do ATCOs not have weather radar imagary sumperimposed on their displays?

It is surely not beyond the wit of man and would do so much to reduce workload in times of severe weather.
Doors to Automatic is offline   Reply
Old 1st Sep 2007, 21:01   #19 (permalink)
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doors to Automatic View Post
Just out of interest given that the industry is so highly technological why on earth do ATCOs not have weather radar imagary sumperimposed on their displays?
It is surely not beyond the wit of man
Define 'weather'. Thats just one of the difficulties.

BD
BDiONU is offline   Reply
Old 1st Sep 2007, 22:22   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: World
Posts: 236
Definition of "weather" from an aviator's point of view?

That which could wrench your wings of at the wing roots!

Seriously: possible severe turbulence, icing, lightning strikes, unusual airframe stresses = not fun.

320 heart rates per minute not fun.
covec is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 15:51.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".