PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22nd February 2007, 18:52   #1 (permalink)
elcapo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lux
Posts: 6
Wake turbulence separation

Dear people,

I was looking for an official document stating the wake turbulence separation applied to a medium a/c behind a Boeing 757 on T/O and LDG. (official doc if possible)
I would like to know as well the official rule for the start of timing regarding wake turbulence separation on T/O, as some start timing at brake release and others at rotation of preceeding.

Many thanks for your inputs.
Regards

Elcapo

elcapo is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2007, 19:39   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Swanwick (LTC)
Posts: 215
For the approach:

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP493PART1.PDF

Page 84, table at the bottom
Defruiter is offline   Reply
Old 22nd February 2007, 19:53   #3 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 29
Posts: 3,238
Elcapo,

Be aware, the above is a UK publication. We treat the 757 as an 'upper medium', and not as a 'heavy' as many European states do.
Gonzo is offline   Reply
Old 22nd February 2007, 20:06   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 982
Wrt the timing question:

Wake vortex on departure doesn't start until the aircraft rotates and the wings start to produce lift. Therefore the 2 minutes or whatever should start at that point. Many tower controllers will tell you that they are experienced in judging the issuing of take-off clearance so that the next aircraft will rotate as close as possible to 2 or 3 minutes (but not less) after the preceding one rotated.

Then there is the "Heathrow two minutes"...
eyeinthesky is offline   Reply
Old 22nd February 2007, 20:21   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lux
Posts: 6
Thanks for your replies so far. For the LDG it is pretty clear, as for the T/O not at all. I am F/O in a european company, during my ATPL I have been told to consider it as a heavy, but it changed since. Officially it is a medium type, so for LDG I found official docs, as for T/O not yet. Personally I am timing once the preceeding is starting to roll,as it will take me +- the same time to reach the rotation point. But it would be nice to find something written regarding that.
elcapo is offline   Reply
Old 22nd February 2007, 20:29   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Asia
Posts: 93
I think it's not that difficult, just hit your your timer when you see the preceding aircraft start moving and commence your take off 2 minutes later. I'm sure that's what the tower guys do, no? Granted the time from brakes off to rotation may vary but I'd say it would be negligable - maybe in the order of 10secs max?
huckleberry58 is offline   Reply
Old 22nd February 2007, 20:34   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lux
Posts: 6
Yes huckleberry, but I need an official statement, logically it is like that, but I am sure that it should be written somewhere. Thanks anyway.
elcapo is offline   Reply
Old 24th February 2007, 11:07   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lux
Posts: 6
Still waiting for some replies.

Thanks
elcapo is offline   Reply
Old 24th February 2007, 11:21   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth
Age: 21
Posts: 109
in aussie
B757 is a heavy if it's the leading aircraft, and a medium if following an official heavy,
i think here it's 6nm/3min separation on radar and for arrival...
in AIP ENR section i can find the exact page if your question is inregard to aussie rules and regs
Swanie is offline   Reply
Old 24th February 2007, 11:47   #10 (permalink)
161R
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Wake Vortex

For a more in depth explanation of the UK situation,try http://www.chirp.co.uk/new/Downloads/pdfs/AIC17_99.pdf

161R is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2007, 20:10   #11 (permalink)
barnatco
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Barcelona
Age: 50
Posts: 1
B757 Vortex Separation

This also applies in Spain on Approach Control. Likewise, the vortex separation we provide between two B757' s is five miles on the localiser.

barnatco is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VFR Wake turbulence separation in Class E airspace Jerricho ATC Issues 27 29th November 2005 23:48
Wake Turbulence - 75 vs. 74 davethelimey Tech Log 9 14th May 2004 02:30
Wake Turbulence Separation PC7anyone? ATC Issues 9 20th December 2002 11:50
Wake turbulence Mariner9 Questions 4 21st May 2001 14:24
Wake Vortex separation Nubboy Questions 6 3rd April 2001 14:23


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".