PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23rd June 2006, 19:50   #1 (permalink)
pilotho
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: manchester
Age: 22
Posts: 159
clearence or not a clearence

watching some aviation dvds i often hear US ATC give clearences such as:

Speedbird 217 you're cleared land no 2

now how can someone be cleared to land when there is traffic ahead? i mean what if the vis was poor and the preceeding a.cft has not vacated yet??

also what do you guys think of their frequency read backs such as

contact ground now point niner

i know USA CTRs are busy but LHR seem to manage properly!

pilotho is offline  
Old 23rd June 2006, 22:07   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,135
At Heathrow and some other UK airports it is perfectly legitimate and safe for ATC to clear an aircraft to land with the one ahead still on the runway. The phrase "After the landing xxx, cleared to land" where "xxx" is the type of aircraft ahead. Something similar may be used when a landing aircraft is following a departure.

Certain criteria must be met in terms of weather conditions, whether it's day or night, distance between the aircraft, whether the pilot of the following aircraft can see the one ahead, etc. USA procedures are different to ours but have similar safeguards and their procedure would not be employed in fog! All these procedures are published in various manuals and a good place to start for details of the UK procedures is the AIP Gen 3.3.3.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 24th June 2006, 10:29   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Surrey
Age: 31
Posts: 190
Its the whole "anticipated separation" thing again isn't it?

At Heathrow we can use an "after the landing" clearance, but as HD says, there are certain criteria that have to be met before it can be used (eg can only be used for next aircraft to land), and the controller still accepts responsibility for separation (different therefore to a "land after" clearance).

However, in the states they can use it the minute someone first calls eg "BAW123 number 6, cleared to land", which does seem a bit much, but it also seems to work. I presume the controller would still be accepting responsibility for separating the arrivals and if one of them cant vacate the runway then he'd have to start sending the following aircraft around, hence the controller is anticipating that the previous landers will be clear.

I would presume that it can't be used in LVPs and bad weather though.

FB
fly bhoy is offline  
Old 24th June 2006, 10:53   #4 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 29
Posts: 3,238
As to the phraseology, well, I guess it's a culture thing, but it does grate.

Sounds just like the movies....
Gonzo is offline  
Old 24th June 2006, 11:20   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,195
A difference in Outlook

The Yanks are optimists - they assume every landing will be successful, and only interfere when it goes wrong.

Brits are pessimists - they treat every landing as a potential accident, and only give subsequent landing clearance when proven wrong.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 24th June 2006, 19:54   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 30 West
Age: 50
Posts: 769
Best so far was.....

XXX034, you are cleared to intercept LOC 25L, at your discretion break off, follow the Lear Jet, runway 19L, do not join final below 4,000 QNH, you have helicopter traffic below you on final, clear land 19L.

The F/O looked at me with eyes like dinner plates - he had not been to Vegas before

I wish I had been in the helicopter as we turned final, it would have looked stunning - Big Bus, fully configed, 30 degree bank, about 1/2 mile and 600' away.
javelin is offline  
Old 25th June 2006, 13:44   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 540
Quote:
Brits are pessimists
Surely not the case, what about the standard civil "land after" option...

Or the UK Mil "land with one on" options?

CMIIAW... Both clearances are only given subject to laid-down conditions, but both allow the Controller to issue a landing clearance before the runway is vacated.
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 26th June 2006, 08:59   #8 (permalink)
vector4fun
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Silicon Hills
Posts: 146
I dunno, "#2 Cleared to land" isn't a tenth as scary as watching AF T-38's doing full stop landings left of centerline while those on the right side of centerline are in burner doing a touch-n-go....

vector4fun is offline  
Old 26th June 2006, 19:15   #9 (permalink)
Scott Voigt
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,162
Cool

We do clear everyone pretty much to land on first contact (I won't go into the good or the bad of it as I have intersting discussions with some of my brethern here <G>.), we also know that we are responsible and can tell folks to go around. As to the contact ground point nine on clearning, all grounds in the US are 121. something unless otherwise noted. That is one way of getting around the whole thing... If you don't understand though, just simply ask on freq.

regards

Scott

Scott Voigt is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".