PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7th March 2002, 00:36   #1 (permalink)
TripleTAY
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 23
Post Push back

Recently I was requesting push back. I called ground on 121.900 and said: Callsign xxx, stand xxx request clearence to push - reply from ground was: Callsign xxx, you are cleared to push. Seems pretty normal to me, however my colleque afterwards said, that you are not suppose to say so anymore - if he his right - what to say then ??????

TripleTAY is offline  
Old 7th March 2002, 00:49   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SE UK
Posts: 15
Post

- Push Approved - In the UK you are on the Apron where ATC only controls aicraft, not the vehicles that are darting around you, therefore an ATC "clearance" is not appropriate. Other states where ATC tries to control Apron road traffic may be diferent.
b.w.k is offline  
Old 7th March 2002, 03:15   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,135
Post

It was "push-back approved" when I left Heathrow Tower around 8 years ago so it's been in for some while.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 7th March 2002, 04:19   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: I sell sea shells by the sea shore
Posts: 837
Question

I was under the impression that the only things ATC should clear you to do were to Take Off or Land .. .. .Everything else has a different excutive instruction (approval), such as "Push-Back Approved" or "Cross Rwy 26, report vacated".. .. .Came about after the Tenerife B747 accident I think..... .. .Then again, you get joining "Clearances" don't you, "From / to / via" etc, so maybe I'm wrong?. .. .Rgds BEX
BEXIL160 is offline  
Old 7th March 2002, 04:30   #5 (permalink)
Bright-Ling
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 573
Post

My esteemed colleagues are correct.. .. .IN the new CAP 413 <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> it says on page 121 that pilots should request pushback, and apporval is given or denied.. .. .It then says:. .. ."NOTE: APPROVED - NOT CLEAR". .. .(due to the reasons given above)

Bright-Ling is offline  
Old 10th March 2002, 07:22   #6 (permalink)
LN-ATC
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Norway, Stavanger
Age: 29
Posts: 44
Post

Hi!. .. .As far as I remember, the word cleared/clearence shall only be used as stated below:. .. .-take off, touch and go, low approach or landing clearance. .-route/ATC clearance. .-clearance to enter/leave controlled airspace. .-clearance for approach

LN-ATC is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".