PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24th August 2001, 19:15   #1 (permalink)
Established !
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: singapore
Posts: 8
Wink Apron congestion

Wouldn't starting one or two prio to push reduce congestion at the biggie airports? Comments? ATCOs.

Established ! is offline  
Old 24th August 2001, 21:53   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 519
Post

Depends on the tugs/tractors or whatever you call them at your location.

Many pushbacks require a tow forward to a disconnect point. Many tugs cannot control a tow forward with even idle thrust on some aircraft types - they can push back against it, but they can't tow forward with it without excessive risk of over-run.

AA
Ausatco is offline  
Old 25th August 2001, 00:17   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 63
Posts: 1,578
Thumbs up

At EGCC/MAN start is ALWAYS given prior to push. That the "tug release point" on certain stands precudes multi/synchro push backs is besides the point
we aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy
chiglet is offline  
Old 25th August 2001, 07:50   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 61
Red face

At EGPH the apron road runs behind the aircraft, therefore all vehicles come to a stop when they see the anti-collisions from an aircraft starting. This can then block the pushback of the aircraft that prevented your push in the first place!
Bagheera is offline  
Old 26th August 2001, 06:09   #5 (permalink)
Rad1
 
Posts: n/a
Post

There are all manner of reasons that start can't be given on some stands. In one case that i recall, the airport authority introduced a rule that aircraft had to be taken off stand and tugged to the end of the pier before starting because (when the wind was blowing in certain directions) exhaust fumes sometimes got into offices. Rumour had it that if the windows were closed as they were supposed to be in order for the air conditioning to work, that there was no problem but people in the offices often opened the windows for some reason. The result - tremendous inconvenience for crews, groundstaff and ATC and a distinct reduction in efficiency!
 
Old 27th August 2001, 10:34   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,162
Cool

That wouldn't go over well here <G>. At DFW they do a LOT of powered push backs so that they don't have to have so many tugs...

regards
Scott Voigt is offline  
Old 27th August 2001, 19:57   #7 (permalink)
Mark_WI
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 2
Thumbs up

To all Air Traffic Controllers;

I have really enjoyed your feedback and replly to console issues and as well, the related electronics issues which are of high concern for you.

Let me ask you this, if you could have a console constructed so that the core material and laminate would be static dissipative, would you want it in your facility?

I am currently dealing with not only NATCA, but also the top management itself in the FAA, and am currently working with them with this innovative technology.

In essence, the technology would make the console become the first line defense against static electricity problems and it can even help prevent RFI!

Want your input! No matter what country you are from, region you work in or position you work at, Ask as many questions as you'd like to.

Mark_WI is offline  
Old 28th August 2001, 12:58   #8 (permalink)
eyeinthesky
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 982
Post

er... wrong thread, I think!

eyeinthesky is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".