PDA

View Full Version : Typhoons over Grand Canyon


Regie Mental
9th Jan 2015, 17:54
Some great imagery of 1(F) en-route to Red Flag. Good luck on the Ex.

RAF Typhoons fly over Grand Canyon en-route to Nevada for Exercise Red Flag | Daily Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2903402/The-REAL-Gun-Stunning-images-emerge-RAF-Typhoons-flying-Grand-Canyon-en-route-Nevada-Exercise-Red-Flag.html)

Al R
9th Jan 2015, 18:00
Is Typhoon a comfortable jet, relatively speaking, in which to spend a few hours?

orca
9th Jan 2015, 18:22
Do you think there are any with no.3 in position?

Fox3WheresMyBanana
9th Jan 2015, 18:28
Must be one of those Nimrod formations they were on about in another thread; two aircraft in adjacent Altimeter Setting Regions.

Herod
9th Jan 2015, 18:31
"Same way, same day", what's the problem?

TurbineTooHot
9th Jan 2015, 18:51
Al,
Yeah, slightly less roomy than the might Fin, but the seat is much more comfortable and less lower lumbar crunching!
And it's far easier to tank in, what with all the SEP and the FCS, so that makes any trail less fraught (caveat: you can f&&& it up all the same however).

Cheers

Courtney Mil
9th Jan 2015, 18:58
Great pictures. Thanks for posting.

Yes, the seat is as comfortable as an ejection seat can be - a bit hard by necessity.

Good to see some positive News about the RAF.

Here's to the folk doing the job.

Lima Juliet
9th Jan 2015, 19:51
Do you think there are any with no.3 in position?

Thought the same thing, must be one of the Nav crossovers that went to Typhoon! :ok:

LJ

Regie Mental
9th Jan 2015, 22:04
Some video from the same trail on the RAF YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJtr0rEP62E


eJtr0rEP62E

Courtney Mil
9th Jan 2015, 22:42
Do you think there are any with no.3 in position?


Probably. But who cares? It wasn't an official photo shoot. I wonder if they maintained perfect close formation for the entire transit. If I'd been lead I'd have kept them in echelon port for the entire trip. No, really.:E

Fox3WheresMyBanana
9th Jan 2015, 22:47
If I'd been lead

You're a hard man Courtney, but you have to respect standards!

Courtney Mil
9th Jan 2015, 23:14
I promise to try harder in future, my friend. Ready for a Trappers ride any time. As long as I'm in front. :ok:

TBM-Legend
9th Jan 2015, 23:22
It's obvious. Two flights of two in close proximity...:eek:

They do look sharp oner that beautiful piece of real estate:ok:

Navy_Adversary
9th Jan 2015, 23:34
Would the aircraft do the entire transit from Lossie to Nellis non stop? It must be the best part of 12 hours with the Pilots in one position, DVT, Liquids, food and all that!
TIA

Black Sheep One
10th Jan 2015, 01:14
I'd say 2 is tight, and therefore 3 is in the correct position 😀

Al R
10th Jan 2015, 06:32
TTH,

Cheers. I wonder how being reclined for long periods in other jets (16 etc) was.

Great shots btw.

vascodegama
10th Jan 2015, 09:10
Navy

It's sort of hidden in the story. It was done over 4 legs
1 Lossiemouth to Lajes
2 Lajes to Bermuda
3 Bermuda to Eglin
4 Eglin to Nellis
I am a bit surprised at the 13 refuellings though (unless you count the ones on the ground!)

Fox3WheresMyBanana
10th Jan 2015, 09:17
Keeping topped off makes a lot of sense.
You've never had fuel problems well out over the water, have you Navy?

Schnowzer
10th Jan 2015, 10:22
Would the aircraft do the entire transit from Lossie to Nellis non stop? It must be the best part of 12 hours with the Pilots in one position, DVT, Liquids, food and all that!

My best was 10.15 one way and 10.35 back the other the next day in an F3 during GW1, don't know about DVT but it was a pain in the arse.

orca
10th Jan 2015, 10:28
Black Sheep One - and there you have the real lesson. Always best to be a little tight, it'll be the other guy who always gets the flak!

(I blame the whip myself).

Jet Set Willie
10th Jan 2015, 10:51
And someone needs to tell them they are 180 degrees out from the operational theatre yet again!!

P6 Driver
10th Jan 2015, 11:44
"Do you think there are any with no.3 in position? "


Eeeee, when I were a lad, there weren't anybody out of position, 'cos we were perfect"

orca
10th Jan 2015, 11:51
A simple 'No!' would have sufficed.;)

KenV
12th Jan 2015, 19:38
Great pictures.

How come no RAF roundels? The only color on these birds was on the tail fin.

Rhino power
12th Jan 2015, 20:23
How come no RAF roundels? The only colour on these birds was on the tail fin.

The roundels are visible on the side of the fuselage, flanked by the squadron colours, and on the upper surface of the wings...

-RP

GreenKnight121
13th Jan 2015, 06:09
And, like the rest of the paint scheme, they are "lo-viz".

No more carrying around bloody great colourful targets on the aircraft.

KenV
13th Jan 2015, 17:45
No more carrying around bloody great colourful targets on the aircraft.


USN went to all lo-vis decades ago. They're allowing more color now on top of the lo-viz gray. It seems that if opponents are close enough to make out the colored areas of the airplane, they are certainly close enough to see the gray airplane.

Courtney Mil
13th Jan 2015, 20:51
True, but no need to help them more than you have to.

Fox3WheresMyBanana
13th Jan 2015, 21:37
I though all Eagle drivers wanted their aircraft dayglo orange, so the MiG pilots could all go to Hell knowing d@mn well who'd killed them?