Judd
8th Nov 2014, 06:59
The Instrument Proficiency Check - Aeroplanes Form 61-1512 date 09/2014 Flight Test Report has significant differences to the former Form 645 Instrument Rating Test form.
In the Form 645 there was (among other items to be tested) a requirement to conduct at least one instrument approach without flight director or autopilot. In other words manual raw data skill test.
The IPC Form 61-1512 Flight Test Report now has this item removed as a requirement. In other words there is no requirement anymore for an Examiner to assess manual raw data instrument approach flying skills. In view of numerous published research papers concerning degradation of manual flying skills caused by automation dependency, it is curious that CASA has seen fit to disregard the evidence and has chosen to dumb down the Part 61 IPC implying that full use of the automatic pilot and associated AFDS should be used throughout the IPC.
Does anyone know why the flight test requirement to conduct at least one manually flown instrument approach without the use of the flight director and automatic pilot was removed from the IPC? Experience has shown that many candidates whose recent flying career has been primarily on automatics often reveal quite significant difficulties keeping within published tolerances (and that is being kind) when faced with manual non-automatic features instrument flying. Sighs of relief from candidates are quite common when they are permitted to re-instate all the automatics for the rest of the test.
In the Form 645 there was (among other items to be tested) a requirement to conduct at least one instrument approach without flight director or autopilot. In other words manual raw data skill test.
The IPC Form 61-1512 Flight Test Report now has this item removed as a requirement. In other words there is no requirement anymore for an Examiner to assess manual raw data instrument approach flying skills. In view of numerous published research papers concerning degradation of manual flying skills caused by automation dependency, it is curious that CASA has seen fit to disregard the evidence and has chosen to dumb down the Part 61 IPC implying that full use of the automatic pilot and associated AFDS should be used throughout the IPC.
Does anyone know why the flight test requirement to conduct at least one manually flown instrument approach without the use of the flight director and automatic pilot was removed from the IPC? Experience has shown that many candidates whose recent flying career has been primarily on automatics often reveal quite significant difficulties keeping within published tolerances (and that is being kind) when faced with manual non-automatic features instrument flying. Sighs of relief from candidates are quite common when they are permitted to re-instate all the automatics for the rest of the test.