PDA

View Full Version : Medical Cert Issues


I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 00:01
Hi all
Just after a bit of advice. I recently sat my medical exam and the DAME was happy with everything and re-validated my medical cert for 2 months stating there were no issues to be concerned about.

However I received a letter from casa stating they want Alcohol bloods, I inquired with them as to why and they told me that during the questionnaire regarding alcohol use they use a scoring system, and anyone who scores above 3 automatically gets sent for alcohol bloods. I have scored a 4. I don't really know why this is. I answered all the questions honestly and didn't think I was one to be classed as having a drinking problem. I answered no to all "the ever had a DUI, ever had a drink at work, do I ever consume more than 6 drinks in one sitting, e.t.c". The only thing I did state is that I have 2-3 drinks 2-4 times a week (again just being honest). I don't know if that was enough to score me a 4 or if my DAME ticked the wrong box somewhere.

It is a class 2 for a PPL(A). I received the letter on Monday and had blood taken that evening, however I was at a childs birthday the Sunday before where the alcohol was flowing freely and I had a couple (3 beers so around 4 std drinks over 4 hrs). I haven't had a drink since receiving the letter. 2 of the 3 blood test have come back, the full bloods came back normal, the liver function tests came back with some slightly elevated numbers (I can provide details if anyone knows what they mean) which from what I have read are very sensitive and can be not only be from recent alcohol consumption (not alcohol abuse) but can also be from some meds and even smoking, as well as early signs of liver problems. I'm still waiting on my carbohydrate-deficient transferrin test results, and from what I understand that is the real alcohol abuse test but again can be elevated from recent consumption (again, not abuse). Now when I went for my medical I had a talk to the DAME about my smoking and she prescribed Zyban which is a stop smoking drug which I was on and had not smoked for around 2 weeks when I did my blood tests, however I was using nicotine patches on the DAMES advice to increase my chance of success.

The other problem I have is it takes about 2 weeks to get into see my DAME, and my medical runs out on 22/9. Anyone ever had any experience with a similar situation? I'm just trying to figure out weather to give them my current blood test results with them being slightly elevated and get back inthe air ASAP or wait a week or 2 without drinking and have more blood taken and give them clean test results. And do you think this is the sort of thing that CASA are going to give me a hard time about for months/years to come (i.e am I stuffed?).

Any help/advice appreciated.

Des Dimona
19th Sep 2014, 05:01
The message here is to be very careful with the responses on these medical forms.


An innocent response can trigger the sort of over reaction that the CASA medical branch is increasingly becoming well known for.


Practical interpretations are a thing of the past for as long as the existing (and out of touch) Head of Aviation Medicine remains employed.

I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 05:14
I had a chat to an old instructor about this, when I told him my situation his first words were "oh no", then he suggested in future to re-evaluate my definition of honest.

Aussie Bob
19th Sep 2014, 05:32
You now know for next time ...

I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 05:58
Yes I do!...

Two_dogs
19th Sep 2014, 06:06
I really feel for you and the predicament you are now in. Avmed are a law unto themselves and have been known to disregard leading SPECIALIST advice regarding pilot health risks. This may take a long time to resolve, and follow you around as you predicted. It may have a detrimental effect on your career for a long time to come.

Here's some advice I gave last time this subject came up ...

NO,NO,NO,NO,YES,NO,NO,NO,NO.
When I do my medical each year the answers never change.

Just answer NO to everything except the one about 20 min exercise.
I have two doctors, a DAME for aviation medicals and a GP for other stuff. :ok: A sad indictment on the Avmed section of CAsA.

I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 06:13
Have you got a link for the last time this came up, nothing turned up in my search.

Oh I already have a non aviation career, flying is (was?) for pleasure, think I might buy a boat.

Car RAMROD
19th Sep 2014, 06:29
http://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/487851-fast-test-maybe-we-all-have-problem.html

I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 07:21
I have PM'ed him but he hasn't been online for a few weeks, anyone know what the outcome for Dogman (The OP in that thread) was? His profile still lists him as a pilot so hopefully all went well.

Old Fella
19th Sep 2014, 07:50
It would seem that CASA do not trust the DAME's to conduct aviation medicals. In my case I was honest, some may say silly, enough to be honest when questioned about visits to hospital. I had the treatment recommended by the Urologist in whose care I have been for years. All subsequent tests have shown I no longer have any issue. The DAME, my regular GP, the Urologist and the treating Specialist all advise me they can see no reason my Medical Certificate (Class 2) should not be renewed.

CASA insist on having reports from an Oncologist before reviewing their decision. For me it is not worth the cost involved to take the chance that CASA may relent. It is a case of CASA owns the ball.....!

Capt Fathom
19th Sep 2014, 07:50
My DAME doesn't even ask the questions!
He just looks at me and goes...NO,NO,NO,NO,YES,NO,NO,NO,NO
:uhoh:

I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 08:05
I just paid $50 and emailed a request to have my medical cert extended. I feel so dirty.

Ollie Onion
19th Sep 2014, 08:13
This happened to a bloke at work after he was 'too honest' on the medical questionnaire. He had the blood test and assumed that would be the end of it, turned out his liver tests showed areas of concern and CASA decided he was a full blown alcoholic despite several specialists giving him letters to say he had a genetic liver issue which results in elevated liver results. Basically he was off work for 9 months as despite the specialist evidence CASA were not happy bunnies and stated it was up to him to 'prove he wasn't an alcoholic'.

End of the day the lesson is, be very very very careful how you answer those questions.

Creampuff
19th Sep 2014, 08:30
The only thing between innocent punters and the 30,000 death plunge is Our Saviour: The PMO. (Blessed be the PMO!)

There is 'recent medical research' to show that most aviation accidents and incidents are caused by undiagnosed medical problems. These problems are obvious to Our Saviour (Blessed be the PMO!) but hidden to mere specialists and other medical practitioners with combined experience of centuries.

In order to be saved thou must disclose every aspect of your personal life and undergo intrusive tests, so that Our Saviour (Blessed be the PMO!) can reach the divine satisfaction and mercifully certify mere mortal aviators. The weak and lame are miraculously saved, by the laying on of conditions.

Sinners who doubt Our Saviour (Blessed be the PMO!) beware! Thy lack of faith shall be construed as a failure to meet the medical standard, and thee shall be doomed to expensive tests, long delays and, ultimately, litigation.

There endeth the lesson.

50 50
19th Sep 2014, 09:02
Haha priceless!

The latest review of CASA has found that the industry is "actively disengaging with the regulator", gee, I wonder why?

megle2
19th Sep 2014, 09:07
I think there is a change coming up whereas you will fill out the questionnaire on line and then present to the Dame and he/ she just does the medical renewal, logs on and ads to your file which is then processed by Avmed

gerry111
19th Sep 2014, 09:12
Creampuff,


"Not the Messiah: He's a Very Naughty Boy." :ok:

Two_dogs
19th Sep 2014, 10:31
Sorry I_Con, should have read you post properly. First para ... Class 2 medical. Your chosen (non-aviation) career may yet be safe, if CAsA do not ring or write your employer in the meantime. After all, they did send that (http://cvdpa.com/images/pdf/Colour%20Vision%20Deficiency%20Letter%20to%20AOC%20holders.p df) CVD letter to employers recently!

Due the plethora of recent anecdotal evidence, I have decided at my next medical, I shall declare myself a young, non-smoking, fitness fanatical teetotaler. The only thing I may not get away with is my age; my DAME has known me a looong time. :{

I_Con
19th Sep 2014, 11:31
It's ok I'm self employed, they can send me all the letters they want, I'm usually too drunk at work to read em anyway:ok:

I_Con
20th Sep 2014, 11:08
So doing some research into this (and not coming up with much) I have stumbled upon this. (http://http://casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_101965) apparently a DAME can issue a class 2 medical on the spot. Anyone ever heard of this? It's news to me.

thorn bird
20th Sep 2014, 13:01
My advice, once you hit the geriatric age, CAsA considers that is around 55,
go do a premedical medical. Your DAME should be able to give the result figures that get you screwed under the CAsA point system.
You doctor as apposed to DAME can then proscribe the right chemicals to ensure your blood results are those of a sixteen year old athlete and bob's your uncle.
The questionnaire ??? "Lie through your teeth" but it wasn't me said that!!

Dogman
21st Sep 2014, 01:26
Hi guys.....you may remember me from such posts as http://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/487851-fast-test-maybe-we-all-have-problem.html

To answer and help I Con out, here are the results of what happened to me.

I wont go over the whole lot (see above link), but basically I answered the FAST test too honestly and scored a 3........letter from CASA requesting bloods and liver function etc in order to process my Class 1.

Blood tests were completed stat, and forwarded to the GP who did my medical. Unbeknowst to me the GP's office did not forward the results to CASA........so 4 weeks later and getting very close to the 2 month medical stamp extension cut off I phone the av med section only to learn that they never received the results. If I remember correctly that was a Friday, so I quickly scanned and emailed the results to Canberra. Phoned back Monday only to learn that the DAME in charge of checking these things only works for CASA on Tues and Thurs as he has a private practise on the other days - I couldn't believe it?? Here we are paying as a collective $$$$ for our medicals to be assessed and processed and yet they don't employ a fulltime DAME.

Anyway long story short, my test results were fine and full Class 1 issued.

The whole experience left a bad taste in my mouth, and made me realize that many (most) pilots aren't telling the DAME's the truth out of fear of losing their medicals (livelihood) for an extended period, or perhaps straight away. Its certainly not ideal but we (Pilots) are again having to modify our behavior to cater for an imperfect system.

Good luck I Con.......all I can say is that it has not come up again on my further 2 medicals.

Cheers

DM

mikewil
21st Sep 2014, 03:33
Another big issue with medicals is the use of medications such as antidepressants. I know for a fact that there are many pilots taking antidepressant medications but not declaring this on their medical form in fear of having a permanent mark against their name which could haunt them in many years to come.

CASA would clearly prefer to have pilots with mental health issues like depression go undiagnosed and untreated rather than have pilots who are seeking the appropriate treatment for their illness.

Lets just hope that the day that CASA automatically gets access to your medical records never comes...

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 04:17
Dogman, do you mind if ask what your blood test results were? You can pm if you like.

My GGT is at 56 with slight elevations in some other areas of the liver function test.

Virtually There
21st Sep 2014, 04:27
Hey Con, that link above doesn't seem to work. I'm just curious to read it.

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 04:42
I'm on my iPad at the moment but see if this works

http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_101960 (http://http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_101960)
and
http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_101965 (http://http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_101965)

Or go to casa.gov.au and enter "dame handbook" into the search there. When you find the dame handbook it's all in chapter 12.

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 04:48
From the above link:
Previous Section |

12.6.1
The process involved and the required procedure for a DAME to follow for the issue a Class 2 medical certificate is sequentially as follows:

an applicant for a Class 2 medical certificate (the applicant) must first submit a request to CASA's Aviation Medicine Section;
CASA's Aviation Medicine Section will provide a completed 'Medical Background Form' or 'Q01 letter' to the applicant's nominated DAME;
the DAME must review the completed Medical Background Form;
the DAME must obtain, and record, the applicant's agreement to the use of an electronic document under the DAME's electronic signature as the means of issuing the Class 2 medical certificate (if any certificate is issued) and must provide the applicant with a hardcopy also.
the DAME must conduct a medical examination of the applicant.
if an excluded medical condition (see section 12.3 Excluded medical conditions and prior endorsements) is apparent or disclosed, the DAME must not issue a Class 2 medical certificate and must refer the applicant to CASA;
if the DAME's assessment following the medical examination is consistent with the DAME Clinical Guidelines (see section 12.5 DAME Clinical Practice Guidelines), the DAME must issue a Class 2 medical certificate provided:
all necessary investigations and information required have been reviewed: and
the DAME is satisfied that the assessment supports the issue of the Class 2 medical certificate; and
there is no countervailing reason under the DAME delegation, the relevant regulations or this Chapter 12 why a Class 2 medical certificate should not be issued;
if the DAME's assessment following the medical examination is inconsistent with the DAME Guidelines, the DAME must:
not issue a Class 2 medical certificate; and
refer the applicant to CASA, with an opinion concerning a departure from the Guidelines; and
ensure that the applicant is informed that the DAME's assessment is inconsistent with the DAME Guidelines and that the applicant must be referred to CASA for assessment.
if, following an applicant's medical examination, the DAME:
assesses that a Class 2 medical certificate should not be issued; or
holds a reasonable doubt about the applicant's suitability to be issued with a Class 2 medical certificate; then the DAME must do the following;
not issue a medical certificate;
refer the applicant to CASA for medical assessment;
inform CASA in writing of the DAME's reasons for not issuing the certificate;
ensure that the applicant is informed of the DAME's inclination or doubt, and that his or her application must be referred to CASA for assessment.

Virtually There
21st Sep 2014, 05:43
Cheers mate. Looks like the links are being corrupted by smilies. :p

Old Fella
21st Sep 2014, 06:06
Despite my age I was very disappointed that CASA did not accept the result of my Class 2 Medical examination by the DAME. I have to accept that CASA is the final arbiter. Reading some of the posts on this thread makes me wonder "How would those who advocate lying about a condition they believe could lead to losing their medical feel if one of their peers was responsible for the death of one of their family members, as a result of not being truthful"?

It is easy to be a "rebel" on an anonymous forum. I would hope that the situation might be different in real life.

Stikybeke
21st Sep 2014, 06:41
Well seeing as this is apparently about alcohol and we're all confessing......my name's Stkybeke and I'm an alcoholic however I'm now clean. It's been 18 minutes since my last drink !!!:E

bentleg
21st Sep 2014, 06:45
Interesting discussion.


I am 73, have one or two drinks at the end of every day and declared this to my DAME. I have had no issues with my Class 2 medical. There must be a difference somewhere. Maybe it s not the drinking?.

mikewil
21st Sep 2014, 07:08
Reading some of the posts on this thread makes me wonder "How would those who advocate lying about a condition they believe could lead to losing their medical feel if one of their peers was responsible for the death of one of their family members, as a result of not being truthful"?In the case of mental disorders such as depression & anxiety, would you prefer that someone gets medical treatment for the illness and doesn't declare it to CASA, or suffer in silence and let it go undiagnosed whilst still continuing to fly?

I know which I think is the more sensible (and safer) option.

Creampuff
21st Sep 2014, 08:29
Old Fella: In fact, you don't have to "accept" CASA is the "final arbiter". The current system is the result of a choice. A different choice could be made.

The rules could just set the objective standards and expert medical practitioners and specialists could be left to make the decision on whether the candidate meets the standard.

Even under the current system, the AAT can change CASA's decision and, in the case of medical certification in particular, a far greater proportion of CASA's decisions are being changed by the AAT than was the case e.g. a decade ago.

The recent change in approach to colour vision deficiencies demonstrates to me that the increasingly intrusive and disruptive activities of CASA Avmed are not based on any credible data. All I see is some relevance-deprived zealots on a medical crusade, wrapped in the flag of 'aviation safety', doing more damage than good.

Aussie Bob
21st Sep 2014, 09:15
"How would those who advocate lying about a condition they believe could lead to losing their medical feel if one of their peers was responsible for the death of one of their family members, as a result of not being truthful"?
Old fella, were you an insurance salesman once? Why pick the absolute worst case scenario for something eh?

I have seen time and time again medicals knocked back for minor reasons despite the DAME saying no problems. AVMED, refusing to believe the doctor then say it is a problem and send the applicant on a specialist runaround. The specialist then concurs with the doctors opinion and the medical is granted.

I have recently watched a class 2 applicant spend, literally thousands of dollars on specialists to prove what his doctor clearly stated was OK in the first place. Some private pilots don't have these funds. There is no guarantee it won't all happen again when this applicant needs a renewal.

Get off your high horse and realise the system is faulty. AVMED are doctors who don't see patients and don't trust other doctors.

I don't advocate lying for anything and I am fortunate enough to pass all my medicals easily. Some folk are worse off than me but they aren't going to drop dead in the next few years either.

Drink more than a few drinks = liver function test
Smoke one ciggy in the last year = lung function test
Admit ever trying cannabis even 20 + years ago = ongoing drug testing
Take any med for any long term condition = visiting a specialist
Admit a single driving breath test fail = liver function test

All this when the DAME can identify 99% of the time whether there is a problem or not.

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 09:36
Despite my age I was very disappointed that CASA did not accept the result of my Class 2 Medical examination by the DAME. I have to accept that CASA is the final arbiter. Reading some of the posts on this thread makes me wonder "How would those who advocate lying about a condition they believe could lead to losing their medical feel if one of their peers was responsible for the death of one of their family members, as a result of not being truthful"?

It is easy to be a "rebel" on an anonymous forum. I would hope that the situation might be different in real life. Not that I want to get into an argument with this, but I think the situation of people lying to their DAME is CASA's own doing. I have been lurking here for quite some time (look at my join date) and have seen all the CASA bashing statements coming from everyone. Up until 2 weeks ago I though they were all a bunch whiners with nothing better to do, hey I was just a PPL who never had any issues with CASA so what was everyone's problem. Then I got my letter, then I did some research, now I am scared! Scared that they are going to take away the thing I love doing the most (with my clothes on atleast) all because I was too honest (and judging by the comments here, an obvious stand out as I'm the only pilot that drinks). Now I can understand CASA's concern, hell I don't want to share the circuit with someone who has that much of a drinking problem they cant abstain for a day to go flying. But the problem is CASA don't approach these cases in a rational manner.
An innocent response can trigger the sort of over reaction that the CASA medical branch is increasingly becoming well known for.or
Avmed are a law unto themselves and have been known to disregard leading SPECIALIST advice regarding pilot health risks.These are statements said in this thread.

Now I am in the situation of having to play my cards just right to prove (read, satisfy) to CASA that I do not have an alcohol abuse problem (something any DAME would be able to determine if required, with a couple of visits and urine or blood tests, and without the heart ache). If I stuff this up its going to be months of aggravation dealing with CASA, why would anyone want to do that if it could be avoided by one single word, NO instead of YES, especially those who make a living from flying.

So, as Creampuff said, I beleive CASA are "...doing more damage than good..."

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 09:40
Smoke one ciggy in the last year = lung function test
I have admitted to being a smoker at my last two medicals, should I book the test now or wait for the letter once the drunk issues are sorted.

Aussie Bob
21st Sep 2014, 09:48
You should have already had it, its the blow into a thingy test ...

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 09:52
You know what, I would love nothing more than if there was a CASA doctor or approved representative that I could sit down with and discuss my test results and get this sorted in a 20 minute appointment, if only they existed right.

Now how do I express sarcasm on an internet forum? Maybe this emoticon will do it :ugh:

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 10:02
You should have already had it, its the blow into a thingy test ...

Nope never, unless casa are reading this then yes, weekly. I have the lungs of a 16yo :)

mad_jock
21st Sep 2014, 10:07
once didn't read the form the doctor had given me and gave a weekly total instead of the daily one which it requested.

That lead to a very confused conversation for a few mins. Until my error was discovered.

It was agreed though that a daily number was a bit silly as it really doesn't work if you don't drink when working the next day as a pro pilot.

Spotlight
21st Sep 2014, 11:24
I hate to worry you with it Icon, but have you checked if Zyban is an allowable drug for an Australian pilot. It used not to be!

Old Fella
21st Sep 2014, 11:46
Aussie Bob, maybe you should read my previous post (#11) in this thread before you offer me advice. NO, I never was an Insurance Salesman. I, in fact, have been involved in the aviation scene since 1958 and have only recently encountered a problem with the issue of my medical certificate, now a Class 2 but previously a Class 1.

As far as picking the worst case scenario I think it should be obvious. How would you feel if one of your mates had a problem, which left untreated or unreported potentially could lead to incapacitation, then took a member of your family flying and did become incapacitated? I suspect you would be very angry.

I too believe the system is faulty and for the same reasons you cite I decided not to spend a heap of money getting specialist oncologist reports which may or may not persuade CASA AVMED that I am fit to fly.

Mikewil, in answer to your question, neither option you put forward would be acceptable to me, either in sensibility or safety.

Creampuff, as I stated in my original post I am not prepared to go to the expense involved in meeting CASA's demands, so in my case they are the final arbiter. First hand knowledge of the run around a couple of friends of similar age to me have had, and the infrequent flying I normally do, I will just stay grounded.

mikewil
21st Sep 2014, 12:00
Mikewil, in answer to your question, neither option you put forward would be acceptable to me, either in sensibility or safety.Unfortunately we live in a world where a pilot is a profession like any other, the guys/girls flying passenger jets need to put food on the table and pay their mortgage just like anyone else.

While you think it is unsafe or not sensible, there are many instances where a pilot 'shouldn't' fly but still will for the reasons I have outlined above. Sleepless nights & headaches are probably good reasons not to fly an aeroplane, but I am guessing the vast majority of pilots will still show up to work.

Likewise, if a pilot suffers from a mental illness such as depression he or she is likely to consider that the bills still need to be paid prior to saying "I'm depressed so I can no longer fly" and subsequently join the unemployment queue.

Depression is often something that often only lasts a year or two and when adequately treated with medication, would make for a much safer pilot than one who chooses not to get help and suffer in silence for fear of losing his aviation medical.

Old Fella
21st Sep 2014, 12:39
Mikewil, my response to you was in relation to the options you put forward regarding mental disorders. My opinion remains unchanged. That aside, if a pilot feels he/she is not fit enough to fly for any reason, there is nothing "professional" about operating if unfit whether it is a single seater or an A380.

mikewil
21st Sep 2014, 12:47
My opinion remains unchanged. That aside, if a pilot feels he/she is not fit enough to fly for any reason, there is nothing "professional" about operating if unfit whether it is a single seater or an A380.

I agree, but once again we live in the real world where such perfect scenarios are rare to non-existent.

The best thing we can do is not be unreasonable, and try to manage the risks rather than turning a blind eye to them or creating policies which make the risks worse, which it seems aviation regulators are hell-bent on doing.

Creampuff
21st Sep 2014, 20:59
Creampuff, as I stated in my original post I am not prepared to go to the expense involved in meeting CASA's demands, so in my case they are the final arbiter. First hand knowledge of the run around a couple of friends of similar age to me have had, and the infrequent flying I normally do, I will just stay grounded.And that's one of the bad consequences of the current system. Someone of your experience should not be stuffed around at the whim of people who think they know better than your GP or specialist.

Yes: Pilots have to meet the standard. But CASA is not the fount of aeromedical wisdom. The colour vision crusade demonstrates to me that they are untroubled by minor hindrances like 'facts'.

Sunfish
21st Sep 2014, 22:32
The problem folks is that CASA is now under the control of lawyers, and the lawyers main game is to ensure their employment by frightening the hell out of their prey.

They do this by the simple act of asserting that their prey is at risk and liable for all sorts of torts or potentially guilty of all sorts of crimes if they do not employ the lawyer to protect them.

It is plainly obvious by the way the regulations are written:

"all aviation is prohibited......unless, except"

Hence the medical regulations which state that "a certificate must not be issued....unless, except".

Hence the ridiculous standards of proof required to satisfy the lawyers that you are not an alcoholic, terminally ill, crazy or a junkie, or all four.

These proofs are designed to ensure that absolutely no liability can accrue to any CASA employee, CASA, the Department, the Minister and the Government of the day.

Which begs the question: why do we employ these parasites if not to produce a risk management strategy where risk is consistently matched with the associated costs?

The outcome of the current Avmed situation is arguably to make us less safe.

I_Con
21st Sep 2014, 23:53
I hate to worry you with it Icon, but have you checked if Zyban is an allowable drug for an Australian pilot. It used not to be!I honestly do not know, I don't even know where to go to look for it (can someone provide a link).
It doesn't matter because due to some mild side effects which are a bit weird I choose not to fly while on it, I only have a couple of weeks to go on the course, then I was hoping to get back in the air with a fresh medical, but I don't see it happening so smoothly.

I thought the fact the DAME prescribed it during my aviation medical examination would mean its ok. The regs do say check with your DAME before flying with any meds right.

Spotlight
22nd Sep 2014, 01:38
Icon

My own experience was being with my DAME when he rang Avmed to confirm it was okay to prescribe Zyban. He was quite shaken by the response that CASA would revoke the medical certification of any pilot found to be taking the drug.

I_Con
22nd Sep 2014, 01:58
What? Why? Revoke the medical certificate for how long? Just while on Zyban or longer.

I can understand why, my side effects are quite mild but I have read of people reacting in some strange ways, then you have the withdrawal symptoms of quitting for the first couple of weeks.

Spotlight
22nd Sep 2014, 02:33
How long for? I do not know. Regarding the drug itself, the Zyban Fact Sheet lists an alarming number of possible side effects including suicidal thoughts and agitated behaviour along with warnings regarding the operation of machinery.

Sunfish
22nd Sep 2014, 06:33
Icon, you are digging a very deep hole for yourself. Stop right now. Dig it deep enough and CASA might believe you have committed an offence serious enough for them to try and get your real name out of Pprune and prosecute.

None of us take drugs, none drink to excess or have medical conditions that might prejudice our licences. We are all pure as the driven snow. We might know someone who does these things but no one on Pprune would do so.

I_Con
22nd Sep 2014, 07:15
Good point, I was merely looking for advice from someone who had gone through the same thing, but maybe I'll shut up now and let the rest of you continue with the casa bashing.

boofta
22nd Sep 2014, 11:48
Getting a statin prescribed to HELP my bloods was a great idea and fully
approved by the idiots in CASA medical to reduce my risk factors.
I took the CRESTOR for two DAYS STRAIGHT, on the second day I sat
crying most of the day wishing I could suicide cleanly to save my family
cleaning up the mess.
These so called wonder drugs which are pushed by these morons are
far more dangerous than the estimated reduction in risk of stroke etc.
I have been taking blood pressure medication for a few days before
each medical to also please the CASA idiots with a nice normal range
reading. Incidentally my normal blood pressure is around 140/85 which
reduces to 120/70 with a low dose of meds for 2/3 days before each medical.
The blood pressure pills cause massive fluid loss and a feeling of
extreme dehydration in the mouth, with a general feeling of ill health.
I would dearly love to see the subcontinental fool who runs CASA
medical do the treadmill run under my supervision.

Kharon
22nd Sep 2014, 21:52
The embuggerance is really starting to be felt at grass roots level. Our PPL and recreational flying folk rarely have to deal with the CASA, in any meaningful way. It's as I said to Quadrio – tell your tale in the pub, people will listen but, as it don't affect them, the yarn will soon be forgotten. If industry does not get a grip, unites and forces some sort of meaningful response from Truss, the post below will become so common place as to be, unremarkable.

Last chance folks, the clock is ticking and don't ask for whom the bell tolls.

Icon -I have been lurking here for quite some time (look at my join date) and have seen all the CASA bashing statements coming from everyone. Up until 2 weeks ago I though they were all a bunch whiners with nothing better to do, hey I was just a PPL who never had any issues with CASA so what was everyone's problem. Then I got my letter, then I did some research, now I am scared! (my bold)

Toot toot - welcome to the IOS....:ok:

I_Con
31st Oct 2014, 12:04
For everyone that followed this thread (and more for those who might find themselves in the same predicament and search this thread in the future) I thought I'd provide an update.

I eventually got my CDT (Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin) test results back (be warned this test is a slow process so if your asked for this test apply for a medical extension asap). The results were quite low (i.e I don't drink much). And as has been already said my full bloods were all in the normal range, and some of the numbers of my liver function test were slightly elevated (i.e around 10-20% elevated) which my regular GP has put down to a slightly fatty liver which will probably correct itself now that I'm off the cigarettes but has ordered some more test just to be sure (which I think is a bit of a waste of resources to be honest but my wife insists).

I didn't bother retaking the tests after 3 weeks of abstinence (which was bloody hard for a problem drinker by the way :\) as the results were favorable.

So today after a bit of confusion and a lot of waiting I finally got my unrestricted class 2 medical. The confusion was I thought my DAME sent through all the results to CASA when she only sent the CDT results, I did not know this until I rang CASA, I just sent them through myself (I'll get to that).

Before I go any further I just want to state that during every dealing I had with CASA through all this I was honest and open and did not try to hide anything (and if you are reading this AVMED you got my true results), which brings me to a couple of points I wanted to make.

My full bloods (https://www.dropbox.com/s/w8eknkykydmfzyt/Full%20Bloods%20Public%20Modified.jpg?dl=0)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w8eknkykydmfzyt/Full%20Bloods%20Public%20Modified.jpg?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w8eknkykydmfzyt/Full%20Bloods%20Public%20Modified.jpg?dl=0Anyone notice anything with my Haemoglobin? That took about 5 mins in photoshop (and again if your reading this CASA, you got my true results, check with my DAME) and it was me responsible for forwarding this to AVMED. (Maybe they check with the lab though, however...)

Secondly, when getting these bloods taken at the medical centre , not once was I asked for any ID other than my medicare card, so I could have sent anyone in my place to get these bloods taken.

The system is fatally flawed, I really don't see the point of all this because if I actually was a problem drinker I could have cheated the system quite easily, kinda makes the system obsolete.

Now I did say this update was for future searches, and if someone else does find themselves in the same predicament I am in no way suggesting you should cheat the system.

Lame Bird
19th Aug 2016, 08:47
Just a warning.

On the new AVMED electronic form be very careful what you disclose. Some of their questions are not harmless. I stupidly admitted to some minor day surgery over six years ago and I've just got my letter from CASA wanting me to furnish a report from the specialist that performed the surgery. They admit I've fully disclosed on every aviation medical since then (i.e. yearly) but state it was their oversight that they didn't ask for a report at the time. So six years later I have to go back to that specialist that performed the procedure (assuming I can still track him down and that he's kept his patient records for that long) and ask for detailed medical information and hope that he can provide what's required without it costing me a fortune. If that's not enough, they also want a whole lot of recent assessments done as well to prove that "I do not pose a risk to aviation safety". What do they think I've been doing for the last six years?

If you punish people for telling the truth, does CASA think they will be more or less likely to disclose information next time around? If this an example of their new approach, it's just like their old approach only their jack boots are shinier.