PDA

View Full Version : Pro-Russian rebels have downed a military transport plane


rotornut
14th Jun 2014, 06:48
BBC News - Ukraine crisis: Military plane shot down in Luhansk (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27845313)

Super VC-10
14th Jun 2014, 07:39
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Air_Force_Ilyushin_Il-76_shoot-down

spooky3
14th Jun 2014, 10:38
Not good

Ukrainian Aircraft Shot Down By Separatists (http://news.sky.com/story/1282045/ukrainian-aircraft-shot-down-by-separatists)

JFZ90
14th Jun 2014, 15:56
there is video of the moment the 'object' hit the il-76. it appears to carry on in a straight tajectory after impact. this seems odd for a manpad. lucky unguided rocket? some reports say it was gunfire, so all bases covered so far.

Edit: latest sources saying two empty Igla launchers found. that may explain one hitting, one missing - the latter being the bright object that carried straight on.

BBC News - Ukraine footage 'shows burning plane wreckage' (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27846708)

not a good escalation however it was brought down.

Super VC-10
14th Jun 2014, 18:56
Rumoured to be UR-76777, can anyone confirm?

Photo: UR-76777 ATI Airlines Ilyushin IL-76 by DAVID KENNEDY Photoid: 255401 - JetPhotos.Net (http://jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=255401&nseq=0)

TC_Ukraine
14th Jun 2014, 20:06
Ukrainian officials should close whole airspace over eastern part. now is closed up to fl260. Russian terrorists can easily hit passenger a/c.

NutLoose
14th Jun 2014, 20:42
I hope you and your family are safe, not good things happening in your country

satpak77
14th Jun 2014, 21:21
isnt cargo aircraft "off limits" ? unarmed ?

Sad, hope this situation gets resolved

rh200
14th Jun 2014, 21:56
isnt cargo aircraft "off limits" ? unarmed ?

Wouldn't have thought so. Unless carrying medical markings or something along those lines. What ever the convention says.

Mind you, the convention also says we can do lots of nasty things if the enemy does particular things, but we don't as the media and the lefty's don't like it.

mini
14th Jun 2014, 23:19
So these "rebels" are not in receipt of Russian weapons...

Yeah right.

Tankertrashnav
14th Jun 2014, 23:24
isnt cargo aircraft "off limits" ? unarmed ?




In a war situation I dont think that has ever been the case. I once researched a wartime Beaufighter pilot, a DFC and an accredited "ace". Three of the kills in his tally consisted of a flight of unescorted JU 52s which he encountered over the Med. They could have been carrying vital war supplies or troops to North Africa - either way he had no choice but to shoot them down, although I don't suppose he took much pleasure in doing so.

Here however we have an undeclared war, and I doubt if the pro-Russian "troops" who shot this aircraft down give much thought to the Geneva convention.

ShotOne
14th Jun 2014, 23:32
All the participants are in receipt of lots of Russian weapons -what's your point, mini?

rh200
14th Jun 2014, 23:35
So these "rebels" are not in receipt of Russian weapons...

There's a nice set of satellite shots from a commercial operator now being published, which sort of make it obvious that the tanks the rebels got came from Russia.

Putin is stokeing this for all he's worth. Until the west gets serious, it will just keep going and getting worse.

Couldn't the Ukrainians just use the Chechnya solution, after all thats a Russian approved method? Oh wait the Ukrainians are civilized.

ShotOne
15th Jun 2014, 05:57
"Use the Chechnya solution..." Even if you're being ironic that's exactly the thinking that propagated this dire situation. When the elected President was chased from office by a murderous mob we applauded the end result, if not necessarily the violence. And now our best "solution" on offer is genocide?

Capetonian
15th Jun 2014, 06:12
Only a matter of time before a civilian a/c is shot down. The terrorist scum did it during the war in Rhodesia, the Hunyani and the Umniati, murdering over 100 innocent civilians, mostly holidaymakers.

Fitter2
15th Jun 2014, 08:17
When the elected President was chased from office by a murderous mob we applauded the end result


As reported by all the media the start was the President sending troops to shoot down unarmed protesters when he went back on his promises re the EU. (Why the Ukrainians are keen on the EU is another question).


There was also no looting or destruction of government buildings after the President fled.


Where does your 'murderous mob' come from?

Ronald Reagan
15th Jun 2014, 10:49
Fitter2, I remember seeing footage of police being set on fire in the street with petrol bombs.


The correct way to act would have been for the people to wait until the next Presidential election in 2015 and then vote him out of office. All of what is happening in Ukraine now could then likely have been avoided.

rh200
15th Jun 2014, 10:53
All of what is happening in Ukraine now could then likely have been avoided.

All of what is happening in Ukraine now could likely have been avoided if the Russians hadn't decided they couldn't undermine the Ukraine with their patsy and resorted to terrorism.

ErwinS
15th Jun 2014, 11:22
IL-76MD 76777 c/n 0083482490

Ronald Reagan
15th Jun 2014, 11:26
The people of Eastern Ukraine want independence, if Kiev recognise this and stop attacking them then the war will stop and there will be no more loss of life.

TC_Ukraine
15th Jun 2014, 11:50
The people of Eastern Ukraine want independence,
who told u that? ruSSian media? I have lot's of friends and relatives there. nobody wants neither to create new small country or become part of 2nd north Korea (called Russia).
I remember seeing footage of police being set on fire
in the street with petrol bombs.
1 no any policeman died or was seriously injured with fire
2 lots of videos showing how police were throwing Molotovs in the crowd
3 protesters started to use molotovs when we got "north korean laws".

Ronald Reagan
15th Jun 2014, 13:08
TC_Ukraine, my friends in the east of Ukraine hate the new government in Kiev. They were fairly happy until the President many of them supported was ousted in the coup. Now they want to get as far from Kiev as they can. If anything since the military operation by Kiev the opinions of my eastern friends have got ever harder against Kiev. If a group of people rise up in one part of the country and can oust a democratically elected President then a group of people in another part of the country can rise up, break away and create their own new country. Fair is fair after all! Western Ukraine can move closer to the western world while eastern Ukraine can be separate and closer with Russia.
The people of eastern Ukraine deserve their desire for freedom to be recognised.

Karel_x
15th Jun 2014, 14:23
I think that there are much places for discussing policy. This is aviation forum.

There is no chance to find common consensus who is who, who is aggressor, who terrorist, who is fascist, who is responsible for violence, what president, referendum or elections were legal or not. Ukraine consists of quite different people - Gallicians (now at government and very, very rusophobic) and Russians at SE part of country. There are also other nations in UE, but it is not important for this moment. Everything is very, very complex and cant be told in several sentences. We can bring hundreds of arguments for/against both sides. Violence lost its limits, a hatred is increasing on both sides every day. Blood calls for blood... Very sad, but in this forum also very off topic.

Melchett01
15th Jun 2014, 16:09
isnt cargo aircraft "off limits" ? unarmed ?

Nope, nothing is off limits in an insurgency. In fact, the bigger the bang you can create, the more publicity you generate and the greater the levels of fear you can engender, thus hopefully forcing the opposition to the negotiating table.

Plus there is already precedence for this sort of thing. A Belarussian Il-76 was shot down going into Mogadishu in 2007 and an Israeli 757 was attacked with 2x SA-7 whilst departing Mombassa Moi International in 2002. In both cases, Al Shabaab were implicated.

Machinbird
15th Jun 2014, 16:31
isnt cargo aircraft "off limits" ? unarmed ?The short answer is, No, of course not, not during an insurrection.

Why do you think US C-130 aircraft used an assault profile landing approach going into contested airstrips in Vietnam?

I hope folks who do not want to get shot down remember to turn off all their lights going into contested areas at night.

Super VC-10
15th Jun 2014, 16:43
A/c confirmed as 76777, ex EP-TPY / UR-76777 / CCCP-76777

Reinhardt
15th Jun 2014, 17:41
With a little bit of luck, those casualties from that Il-76 will have been some of the US mercenaries fighting now in eastern Ukraine, as reported by a lot of people including the german Bild newspaper. Totally similar to Blackwater fighting alongside the Croats to oust the Serbs from Krajina 20 years ago - except that this time the Russians are going to be a much, much tougher nut to crack.
For your information a lot of people in Europe are no longer swallowing the usual propaganda from NATO, and be sure should US troops land there they will get such a welcome, Vietnam will have been a picnic compared to. But they seem to be busy in Middle-East again... also bombing themselves in Afghanistan, as they have been for years.


That why it's so much easier to send mercenaries, ar 1000 $ a day.


FYI, a european Air Force conducted less 8 months ago a squadron exchange with the Russian AF - same country which is currently polishing before delivery two beautiful assault ships (sort of aircraft carriers) which will fit very nicely in the russian Baltic and Black Sea fleets - thus making some to strangle themselves on the other side of the Atlantic, but who cares ....
So just to see how we care about it, enjoy the pictures :


Première historique pour les pilotes russes et français. (http://www.air-actualites.com/diaporama/08-2013-premiere/)


France Moves to Defy Allies on Sale of Warship to Russia - WSJ (http://online.wsj.com/articles/france-moves-to-defy-allies-on-sale-of-warship-to-russia-1401877000)

NutLoose
15th Jun 2014, 17:47
You think if the deal does go ahead they would at least make it a proviso that the seized Ukrainian ships are returned

500N
15th Jun 2014, 19:01
Since the US never seems to take a huge amount of notice of anyone when selling arms to people, is it not surprising France takes no notice of anyone else.

smujsmith
15th Jun 2014, 19:50
I doubt the veracity of the claim that cargo aircraft are exempt attack. From personal experience in C130 ops in to Sarajevo, we expected ground fire, and experienced heavier stuff. All we hoped was that our training and intelligence briefings gave us a good indication on the day.

Smudge:ok:

West Coast
15th Jun 2014, 19:51
But is the US selling arms to someone currently they are at odds with?

I could be wrong, more question than a stance.

500N
15th Jun 2014, 19:55
"But is the US selling arms to someone currently they are at odds with?"

Currently.

With the US, friends one year, enemy the next ! :rolleyes:


The enemy of my enemy is my friend ? The US in bed with Iran to defeat ISIS ?

West Coast
15th Jun 2014, 21:21
So, no then.

rh200
15th Jun 2014, 23:40
With Obama who can tell who your friend is. is he still peddling the line that he won't supply Ukraine so as to not inflame the situation? I'm gathering the Russians arn't supplying them.