PDA

View Full Version : AWACS to monitor Ukraine


Top Bunk Tester
11th Mar 2014, 10:17
BBC News - Ukraine crisis: RAF jet to monitor Ukraine border (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26523816)

An MoD spokeswoman said a single RAF plane and pilot would be involved in the mission

This will be really interesting :D

Fox3WheresMyBanana
11th Mar 2014, 10:40
Smacks of "We've got to do something", no matter how pointless (or expensive)

Isn't there one mainstream journalist prepared to ask "And what will this achieve, exactly, Minister, at a cost of £25,000 per flying hour?"

Wensleydale
11th Mar 2014, 11:03
F3,


As part of the NAEW&C Force, tasking authority for the E-3D lies with NATO, not the UK - You will probably find that the aircraft has been tasked by them, and seeing as the aircraft is deployed to fly within NATO airspace then it is not really surprizing. (And your estimate of cost is way short of the mark)!

500N
11th Mar 2014, 11:09
It actually says just that in the article.

Top Bunk Tester
11th Mar 2014, 11:18
Won't the single pilot have his hands full flying the aircraft to do any useful monitoring :E

racedo
11th Mar 2014, 11:25
Bet they tune into Sky News to see what is really happening...............

GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU
11th Mar 2014, 12:03
And your estimate of cost is way short of the mark

An interesting point. I suspect that a large element of any costing will be the fixed overheads (eg Base and infrastructure, support chain, Group/Command admin and the like). On that basis, the more you fly the A/C, the cheaper it becomes.

I wonder if anyone's missing the Searchwater capability yet?

racedo
11th Mar 2014, 12:11
On that basis, the more you fly the A/C, the cheaper it becomes.

Or the more you fly the more fuel, personnel costs and line maintenance that you need to do.

Like everything you can justify A or B depending on what figures you use.........
tried that once saying going to pub saved SWMBO from cooking, meant we would use less energy and was good exercise, got a medal for trying though.

NutLoose
11th Mar 2014, 12:50
Maintenance can be offset against manufacturers warranty, why do you think the likes of Ryan Air get shot at about the 5 year mark, the cost goes up post warranty. Only the Military who have no commercial interest will continue flying aircraft that even a third world African Airline would have retired long ago.

Fuel costs and personnel also can be offset as the more it flies, the more revenue it produces and hence again the greater the profit, remember it needs to earn XYZ simply to pay for hull insurance and to service the bank loans on it, you need to clear those to make a profit. Also airborne it's not accruing parking fees :)

West Coast
11th Mar 2014, 12:59
Fox3

They can train in the local flying area at £25000/hr or they can train nearest to a shooting war and get some real world experience at £25000/hr. P

Fox3WheresMyBanana
11th Mar 2014, 14:47
West Coast - agreed if it's in their regular hours; but it's a waste if it isn't. I got the cost from the USAF - doesn't surprise me that NATO is more!

CoffmanStarter
11th Mar 2014, 15:25
There was a brilliant BBC cock-up during breakfast news early this morning ... Charlie Stayt announced that Britain was to deploy a "Spy Plane" to monitor the situation in the Ukraine ... and then the BBC put a library picture of the British Army Watchkeeper UAV :ugh:

INT ZKJ
11th Mar 2014, 15:36
So wrong on both counts then??

Hangarshuffle
11th Mar 2014, 17:39
Got to be seen to be doing something.
I'll tell you what to do, minister, in this situation.
**** all. Keep the UK totally out of it.

Not_a_boffin
11th Mar 2014, 17:56
Odds on a Sentinel deployment in fairly short order?

Only one more year before SDSR2010 mandated OSD.......

orgASMic
12th Mar 2014, 08:39
I would have thought that Sentinal was a more appropriate platform, given that the immediate issue in and around the Crimea is the disposition of Russian ground forces. Or is this part of a wider effort to assure the Baltic States that their lack of organic air defence is ok with us and we will monitor any perceived Russian air threat?

Wensleydale
12th Mar 2014, 09:05
"I would have thought that Sentinal was a more appropriate platform, given that the immediate issue in and around the Crimea is the disposition of Russian ground forces. Or is this part of a wider effort to assure the Baltic States that their lack of organic air defence is ok with us and we will monitor any perceived Russian air threat?"


To reiterate... The Sentry is a NATO asset! When NATO says go then the Sentry goes. As the UK Component of the AEW&C Force, the Sentry will no doubt join the E-3As from Geilenkirchen in providing surveillance from NATO airspace as it always has done! This is not the first time that E-3s have deployed to Poland. (And yes, the MOD has to apply to NATO for a Sentry for National tasking - something that has upset many VSOs over the years when they have been told that they cannot have a short notice Sentry for their exercise).

Q-RTF-X
12th Mar 2014, 10:28
We have a commitment to NATO and we should honor our commitments for God’s sake. This is not even about saber rattling etc., nobody is taking a threatening posture, simply being sensible and keeping a watching eye on developments from a distance. It’s joining our allies in keeping abreast of a situation while at the same time honoring our commitments. Nice to see we keep our word for a change :D. God help us from all you hand wringing naysayers.

Ronald Reagan
12th Mar 2014, 14:02
Belarus offers Russia to deploy extra 15 planes due to NATO activity near border - News - Politics - The Voice of Russia: News, Breaking news, Politics, Economics, Business, Russia, International current events, Expert opinion, podcasts, Video (http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_03_12/Belarus-offers-Russia-to-deploy-extra-15-planes-due-to-NATO-activity-near-border-5336/)

Whenurhappy
12th Mar 2014, 16:08
Yeah, you don't see many MiG-15s flying these days, do you?

Ronald Reagan
12th Mar 2014, 20:57
Putin's ratings higher than ever: 70% ready to vote if elections were held Sunday - News - Russia - The Voice of Russia: News, Breaking news, Politics, Economics, Business, Russia, International current events, Expert opinion, podcasts, Video (http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_03_12/Putins-ratings-higher-than-ever-70-ready-to-vote-if-elections-were-held-Sunday-2314/)

Willard Whyte
12th Mar 2014, 21:58
I'm pretty sure if Putin's real ratings were less than 1% he'd still be in power after an 'election'.

bakseetblatherer
13th Mar 2014, 03:24
Wow he must be almost as popular as his fellow horse riding (though thankfully shirt wearing) buddy in N Korea

North Korea election shock: Kim Jong-un wins 100 per cent of the vote ? Telegraph Blogs (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100263060/north-korea-election-shock-kim-jong-un-wins-100-per-cent-of-the-vote/)