PDA

View Full Version : British Airways' 787


Granada
28th Oct 2013, 19:21
Anyone know the reason for BA substituting their B787 for a B777 on BA93 to YYZ over the last two days? Not another technical glitch is it?

Apparently it's scheduled for a 777 tomorrow too....

Lord Bracken
28th Oct 2013, 19:40
G-ZBJD got dinged by a set of engineering steps today, will be out of service for a week or so. Was scheduled to operate the BA 187.

Granada
28th Oct 2013, 19:44
Is it usual for an aircraft to be out of action for a week after a close encounter with a set of steps? :ooh:

Expect someone in ground handling got a roasting. Must have been quite a whack.

xray one
28th Oct 2013, 19:50
Composite vs metal...a small ding with metal will take a short time to fix with speed tape or rivet patch. Composite is a whole different ball game because it's not obvious the extent of the damage.

Stuart Sutcliffe
28th Oct 2013, 20:16
I have seen 'coupons' of aircraft composite material hit with calibrated tools, for research and test purposes. The side of the strike has barely visible marks but the rear is pretty shocking - separated and splayed fibres! I suspect that the lack of markings on the visible side of an aircraft fuselage has already led to the guilty walking/running/driving away from incidents where they have dinged aircraft with ground equipment! :rolleyes:

Granada
28th Oct 2013, 20:24
You'd hope people hadn't walked/run away!

Steps aside, what's happened the Toronto flights?

Surely not hit by steps too? Once is unlucky, twice is careless....

Coffin Dodger
28th Oct 2013, 20:51
If a slight disagreement with a set of steps results in a whole week (or even just a few days) out of commission for an aircraft while examination/repairs are carried out then composites are potentially going to prove prohibitively expensive in the long term are they not?

DaveReidUK
28th Oct 2013, 21:08
G-ZBJD got dinged by a set of engineering steps today, will be out of service for a week or so.Wasn't this the same (barely a month old) aircraft that was hit by a truck at Toronto last week ?

DaveReidUK
29th Oct 2013, 08:37
Anyone know the reason for BA substituting their B787 for a B777 on BA93 to YYZ over the last two days? Not another technical glitch is it? Going back to the OP's question, with one of the four 787s having been out of service since 21 October, the only way that a second Newark 787 rotation could be introduced with the Winter schedule on Sunday would have been to take the aircraft off one of the two Toronto rotations (presumably temporarily).

dochealth
29th Oct 2013, 09:28
It sure was. We were stuck at gate while BA and Boeing engineers looked at ultrasound pics for 6 hours. Forward cargo door took the hit that night. Why so many collisions on ramp?

Swedish Steve
29th Oct 2013, 10:44
Why so many collisions on ramp?
The latest incident occured while the aircraft was parked at the engineering base. There was a big storm in LHR and the wind threw some steps at the aircraft.

Tray Surfer
6th Nov 2013, 15:31
Indeed... The steps did not just "bump" into the side of the aircraft, they were thrown against the aircraft during the high winds, with, what I am lead to believe, more than one area of damage.

champair79
6th Nov 2013, 22:38
787 G-ZBJD back in service after its altercation with the set of steps last week. Operated the BA189 to EWR this afternoon.

Champ