PDA

View Full Version : DO We Need A Pilots (and Engineers) Bill Of Rights?


Sunfish
11th Jul 2013, 21:04
Our American cousins have just been delivered a Pilots BIll Of Rights by Congress. It regulates the actions of the FAA in investigating and punishing pilots. Putting aside the cynicism for the moment, wouldn't an Australian equivalent be a good thing? I wonder how the American bill would have affected the treatment of Dominic James, John Quadrio, Barrier et al? WHat should an Australian bill contain? Should it extend to operators?



S.1335

One Hundred Twelfth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

An Act

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide rights for pilots, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Pilot’s Bill of Rights’.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS AND ELIMINATION OF DEFERENCE.

(a) In General- Any proceeding conducted under subpart C, D, or F of part 821 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, relating to denial, amendment, modification, suspension, or revocation of an airman certificate, shall be conducted, to the extent practicable, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence.

(b) Access to Information-

(1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided under paragraph (3), the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (referred to in this section as the ‘Administrator’) shall provide timely, written notification to an individual who is the subject of an investigation relating to the approval, denial, suspension, modification, or revocation of an airman certificate under chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code.

(2) INFORMATION REQUIRED- The notification required under paragraph (1) shall inform the individual--

(A) of the nature of the investigation;

(B) that an oral or written response to a Letter of Investigation from the Administrator is not required;

(C) that no action or adverse inference can be taken against the individual for declining to respond to a Letter of Investigation from the Administrator;

(D) that any response to a Letter of Investigation from the Administrator or to an inquiry made by a representative of the Administrator by the individual may be used as evidence against the individual;

(E) that the releasable portions of the Administrator’s investigative report will be available to the individual; and

(F) that the individual is entitled to access or otherwise obtain air traffic data described in paragraph (4).

(3) EXCEPTION- The Administrator may delay timely notification under paragraph (1) if the Administrator determines that such notification may threaten the integrity of the investigation.

(4) ACCESS TO AIR TRAFFIC DATA-

(A) FAA AIR TRAFFIC DATA- The Administrator shall provide an individual described in paragraph (1) with timely access to any air traffic data in the possession of the Federal Aviation Administration that would facilitate the individual’s ability to productively participate in a proceeding relating to an investigation described in such paragraph.

(B) AIR TRAFFIC DATA DEFINED- As used in subparagraph (A), the term ‘air traffic data’ includes--

(i) relevant air traffic communication tapes;

(ii) radar information;

(iii) air traffic controller statements;

(iv) flight data;

(v) investigative reports; and

(vi) any other air traffic or flight data in the Federal Aviation Administration’s possession that would facilitate the individual’s ability to productively participate in the proceeding.

(C) GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR AIR TRAFFIC DATA-

(i) IN GENERAL- Any individual described in paragraph (1) is entitled to obtain any air traffic data that would facilitate the individual’s ability to productively participate in a proceeding relating to an investigation described in such paragraph from a government contractor that provides operational services to the Federal Aviation Administration, including control towers and flight service stations.

(ii) REQUIRED INFORMATION FROM INDIVIDUAL- The individual may obtain the information described in clause (i) by submitting a request to the Administrator that--

(I) describes the facility at which such information is located; and

(II) identifies the date on which such information was generated.

(iii) PROVISION OF INFORMATION TO INDIVIDUAL- If the Administrator receives a request under this subparagraph, the Administrator shall--

(I) request the contractor to provide the requested information; and

(II) upon receiving such information, transmitting the information to the requesting individual in a timely manner.

(5) TIMING- Except when the Administrator determines that an emergency exists under section 44709(c)(2) or 46105(c), the Administrator may not proceed against an individual that is the subject of an investigation described in paragraph (1) during the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the air traffic data required under paragraph (4) is made available to the individual.

(c) Amendments to Title 49-

(1) AIRMAN CERTIFICATES- Section 44703(d)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘but is bound by all validly adopted interpretations of laws and regulations the Administrator carries out unless the Board finds an interpretation is arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not according to law’.

(2) AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATIONS, SUSPENSIONS, AND REVOCATIONS OF CERTIFICATES- Section 44709(d)(3) of such title is amended by striking ‘but is bound by all validly adopted interpretations of laws and regulations the Administrator carries out and of written agency policy guidance available to the public related to sanctions to be imposed under this section unless the Board finds an interpretation is arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not according to law’.

(3) REVOCATION OF AIRMAN CERTIFICATES FOR CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS- Section 44710(d)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘but shall be bound by all validly adopted interpretations of laws and regulations the Administrator carries out and of written agency policy guidance available to the public related to sanctions to be imposed under this section unless the Board finds an interpretation is arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not according to law’.

(d) Appeal From Certificate Actions-

(1) IN GENERAL- Upon a decision by the National Transportation Safety Board upholding an order or a final decision by the Administrator denying an airman certificate under section 44703(d) of title 49, United States Code, or imposing a punitive civil action or an emergency order of revocation under subsections (d) and (e) of section 44709 of such title, an individual substantially affected by an order of the Board may, at the individual’s election, file an appeal in the United States district court in which the individual resides or in which the action in question occurred, or in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. If the individual substantially affected by an order of the Board elects not to file an appeal in a United States district court, the individual may file an appeal in an appropriate United States court of appeals.

(2) EMERGENCY ORDER PENDING JUDICIAL REVIEW- Subsequent to a decision by the Board to uphold an Administrator’s emergency order under section 44709(e)(2) of title 49, United States Code, and absent a stay of the enforcement of that order by the Board, the emergency order of amendment, modification, suspension, or revocation of a certificate shall remain in effect, pending the exhaustion of an appeal to a Federal district court as provided in this Act.

(e) Standard of Review-

(1) IN GENERAL- In an appeal filed under subsection (d) in a United States district court, the district court shall give full independent review of a denial, suspension, or revocation ordered by the Administrator, including substantive independent and expedited review of any decision by the Administrator to make such order effective immediately.

(2) EVIDENCE- A United States district court’s review under paragraph (1) shall include in evidence any record of the proceeding before the Administrator and any record of the proceeding before the National Transportation Safety Board, including hearing testimony, transcripts, exhibits, decisions, and briefs submitted by the parties.

SEC. 3. NOTICES TO AIRMEN.

(a) In General-

(1) DEFINITION- In this section, the term ‘NOTAM’ means Notices to Airmen.

(2) IMPROVEMENTS- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall begin a Notice to Airmen Improvement Program (in this section referred to as the ‘NOTAM Improvement Program’)--

(A) to improve the system of providing airmen with pertinent and timely information regarding the national airspace system;

(B) to archive, in a public central location, all NOTAMs, including the original content and form of the notices, the original date of publication, and any amendments to such notices with the date of each amendment; and

(C) to apply filters so that pilots can prioritize critical flight safety information from other airspace system information.

(b) Goals of Program- The goals of the NOTAM Improvement Program are--

(1) to decrease the overwhelming volume of NOTAMs an airman receives when retrieving airman information prior to a flight in the national airspace system;

(2) make the NOTAMs more specific and relevant to the airman’s route and in a format that is more useable to the airman;

(3) to provide a full set of NOTAM results in addition to specific information requested by airmen;

(4) to provide a document that is easily searchable; and

(5) to provide a filtering mechanism similar to that provided by the Department of Defense Notices to Airmen.

(c) Advice From Private Sector Groups- The Administrator shall establish a NOTAM Improvement Panel, which shall be comprised of representatives of relevant nonprofit and not-for-profit general aviation pilot groups, to advise the Administrator in carrying out the goals of the NOTAM Improvement Program under this section.

(d) Phase-in and Completion- The improvements required by this section shall be phased in as quickly as practicable and shall be completed not later than the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 4. MEDICAL CERTIFICATION.

(a) Assessment-

(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate an assessment of the Federal Aviation Administration’s medical certification process and the associated medical standards and forms.

(2) REPORT- The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress based on the assessment required under paragraph (1) that examines--

(A) revisions to the medical application form that would provide greater clarity and guidance to applicants;

(B) the alignment of medical qualification policies with present-day qualified medical judgment and practices, as applied to an individual’s medically relevant circumstances; and

(C) steps that could be taken to promote the public’s understanding of the medical requirements that determine an airman’s medical certificate eligibility.

(b) Goals of the Federal Aviation Administration’s Medical Certification Process- The goals of the Federal Aviation Administration’s medical certification process are--

(1) to provide questions in the medical application form that--

(A) are appropriate without being overly broad;

(B) are subject to a minimum amount of misinterpretation and mistaken responses;

(C) allow for consistent treatment and responses during the medical application process; and

(D) avoid unnecessary allegations that an individual has intentionally falsified answers on the form;

(2) to provide questions that elicit information that is relevant to making a determination of an individual’s medical qualifications within the standards identified in the Administrator’s regulations;

(3) to give medical standards greater meaning by ensuring the information requested aligns with present-day medical judgment and practices; and

(4) to ensure that--

(A) the application of such medical standards provides an appropriate and fair evaluation of an individual’s qualifications; and

(B) the individual understands the basis for determining medical qualifications.

(c) Advice From Private Sector Groups- The Administrator shall establish a panel, which shall be comprised of representatives of relevant nonprofit and not-for-profit general aviation pilot groups, aviation medical examiners, and other qualified medical experts, to advise the Administrator in carrying out the goals of the assessment required under this section.

(d) Federal Aviation Administration Response- Not later than 1 year after the issuance of the report by the Comptroller General pursuant to subsection (a)(2), the Administrator shall take appropriate actions to respond to such report.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

Ex FSO GRIFFO
12th Jul 2013, 01:34
GOOD ONE Sunny, have you sent it to your local FED member as yet?

And, although I could not see this in the USA ones, howabout amending 'ours' to read along the lines of something like -

'ALL rules and regulations / orders be written a SIMPLE language that the persons affected (us/we) can understand'.....

:ok:

LeadSled
12th Jul 2013, 03:27
Folks,
Do we need one, yes!
Will we get one, No !!

And what are we going to get --- another $98M for Wodger to "drill down", apparently on the basis that any CASA surveillance/audit/whatever that doesn't find criminality hasn't "drilled down" far enough --- we are really getting further away all the time from sensible compliance with objective rules, and further into "required compliance" with entirely subjective CASA demands, as the level of CASA micro-management of Australian aviation companies steadily increases.

Some of the demand I have seem recently, to vary the manufacturer's SOP in the AFM are simply hair-raising in their irrationality, let alone their negative consequences for safe operation. A level of prescriptive procedures that leave no time to look out the window, but no time to really operate the aircraft as the manufacturer (and CAR 138) intended.

One absolute lulu was an FOI stating that the Jepps did not provide adequate information for en-route and terminal operation, or for the availability of navaids.

Tootle pip!!

Ultralights
12th Jul 2013, 04:13
throw this in as well

US Congress Set to Revitalise General Aviation
12 Jul 2013
The US House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has sent the Small Airplane Revitalization Act to the full House of Representatives for consideration.
HR.1848 passed the committee this week and is set to implement recommendations that will cut aircraft certification costs for GA aircraft in half and double safety standards.
In the preamble to the Act, congress acknowledges several challenges faced by the general aviation industry in the USA including the loss of 10,000 active pilots every year and that regulatory barriers have contributed to the lack of investment in new designs resulting in a 40-year-old fleet.
To correct the situation, the US Congress will direct the FAA to:
Create a regulatory regime for small airplanes that will improve safety and decrease certification costs
Set broad, outcome driven safety objectives that will spur innovation and technology adoption
Replace current, prescriptive requirements contained in FAA rules with performance based regulations
Use FAA-accepted consensus standards to clarify how the Part 23 safety objectives may be met by specific designs and technologies.
The bill has been widely praised in the industry.
General Aviation Manufacturers Association President Pete Bunce was pleased with the news. “The bill will help industry and FAA develop and adopt more effective, consensus-based compliance standards that would spur manufacturers’ investment in aircraft design and help put critical life-saving equipment into the existing fleet of airplanes.”
"It is gratifying to see the broad, bipartisan support for this measure in the House," said Doug Macnair, EAA's vice president of government relations. "The unanimous vote in the House committee acknowledges how this bill will revitalize the lighter end of general aviation, which has faced significant challenges in recent years."
The full text of the Small Airplanes Revitalization Act can be read here.

H.R. 1848: Small Airplane Revitalization Act of 2013
113th Congress, 2013–2015. Text as of May 07, 2013 (Introduced).

Status & Summary | PDF | Source: GPO

HR 1848 IH

113th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1848

To ensure that the Federal Aviation Administration advances the safety of small airplanes, and the continued development of the general aviation industry, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 7, 2013


Mr. POMPEO (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. NOLAN, and Mr. ROKITA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To ensure that the Federal Aviation Administration advances the safety of small airplanes, and the continued development of the general aviation industry, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Small Airplane Revitalization Act of 2013’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:

(1) A healthy small aircraft industry is integral to economic growth and to maintaining an effective transportation infrastructure for communities and nations around the world.

(2) Small aircraft comprise nearly 90 percent of FAA-type certified general aviation aircraft.

(3) General aviation provides for the cultivation of a workforce of engineers, manufacturing and maintenance professionals, and pilots who secure the Nation’s economic success and defense.

(4) General aviation contributes to well-paying manufacturing and technology jobs in the United States, and these products are exported in great numbers, providing a positive trade balance.

(5) Technology developed and proven in general aviation aids in the success and safety of all sectors of aviation and scientific competence.

(6) The average small airplane in the United States is now 40 years old and the regulatory barriers to bringing new designs to market are resulting in a lack of innovation and investment in small airplane design.

(7) Over the past decade, the United States typically lost 10,000 active private pilots per year partially due to a lack of cost-effective, new small airplanes.

(8) General aviation safety can be improved by modernizing and revamping the regulations for this sector to clear the path for technology adoption and cost effective means to retrofit the existing fleet with new safety technologies.

SEC. 3. FAA SAFETY AND REGULATORY IMPROVEMENTS FOR GENERAL AVIATION.
(a) Establishment of FAA Safety and Regulatory Improvements for General Aviation- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall advance the safety and continued development of small airplanes by reorganizing the certification requirements to streamline the approval of safety advancements.

(b) Regulations- The Administrator shall issue a final rule based on the FAA’s Part 23 Reorganization Aviation Rulemaking Committee (established in August 2011) by December 31, 2015. The final rule shall meet the following objectives of the Part 23 Committee:

(1) Create a regulatory regime for small airplanes that will improve safety and decrease certification costs.

(2) Set broad, outcome driven safety objectives that will spur innovation and technology adoption.

(3) Replace current, prescriptive requirements contained in FAA rules with performance based regulations.

(4) Use FAA-accepted consensus standards to clarify how the Part 23 safety objectives may be met by specific designs and technologies.

(c) Consensus-Based Standards- The Administrator shall use acceptable consensus-based standards whenever possible in the spirit of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 3701 note) while continuing to evaluate traditional methods for meeting the objectives of Part 23.

(d) Safety Cooperation- The Administrator shall lead the effort to improve general aviation safety by working with leading aviation regulators to assist them in adopting a complementary regulatory approach for small airplanes.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act, the following definitions apply:

(1) ADMINISTRATOR- The term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

(2) CONSENSUS STANDARDS- The term ‘consensus standards’ means standards developed by voluntary organizations which plan, develop, establish, or coordinate voluntary standards using agreed-upon procedures, both domestic and international. These standards include provisions requiring that owners of relevant intellectual property have agreed to make that intellectual property available on a nondiscriminatory, royalty-free, or reasonable royalty basis to all interested parties. These bodies have the attributes of openness, balance of interest, due process, an appeals process and consensus.

(3) FAA- The term ‘FAA’ means the Federal Aviation Administration.

(4) GENERAL AVIATION- The term ‘general aviation’ means all aviation activities other than scheduled commercial airline operations and military aviation.

(5) SMALL AIRPLANE- The term ‘small airplane’ means FAA-type certificated airplanes that meet the parameters of part 23 of title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.


interesting this comes up as im researching the purchase of a Pipistrel Virus SW100 with 912IS engine kit, 147kts cruise, burning 15ltrs/1hr with an 7 hour endurance. new technology..