PDA

View Full Version : Grenoble crash 05 Jan


fantom
5th Jan 2013, 13:31
BBC reports five dead 'near' Grenoble. No further details yet.

1stspotter
5th Jan 2013, 14:09
Accident: Cinq morts dans un crash à Grenoble - Monde: Faits divers - lematin.ch (http://www.lematin.ch/monde/faits-divers/Cinq-morts-dans-un-crash-a-Grenoble/story/27205886?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed)

There were five passengers. Five victims are to be deplored, "announced the French gendarmerie.

For an unknown reason the time, the twin-engine crashed into the town of Saint-Pierre-de-Bressieux, close to the airport, a few minutes after takeoff.

The aircraft was heading to Morocco, where he was registered, with a stopover in Spain, it was learned from sources close to the investigation. The alert was given by a resident of Saint-Pierre-de-Bressieux who saw the plane crashing against a hill.

Relief then dispatched to the scene discovered a burning aircraft and five lifeless body. The identity of the passengers was not communicated in the first instance, no more than their nationality

sitigeltfel
5th Jan 2013, 16:17
La Provence (http://www.laprovence.com/article/france/crash-dun-avion-a-grenoble-un-couple-de-marocains-et-leurs-trois-enfants-tues) reporting that the five casualties were two parents and their three children. :sad:

Doodlebug
5th Jan 2013, 16:26
The paper has the aircraft type down as a CASA C-295, one would think a military-transport type turboprop an unusual aircraft type for a family?

wiggy
5th Jan 2013, 16:31
Err, I think the C-295 is being mentioned in the context of an accident in the area last year.

RetiredF4
5th Jan 2013, 16:33
The paper has the aircraft type down as a CASA C-295, one would think a military-transport type turboprop an unusual aircraft type for a family?

That was the crash in November in Lozere. Nothing in the article, that it was the same aircraft type here.

sitigeltfel
5th Jan 2013, 16:51
One blog is suggesting the aircraft is a Piper Seneca.

Doodlebug
5th Jan 2013, 16:55
That sounds more plausible. Poor buggers.