PDA

View Full Version : Why no regular use of CO detectors in light aircraft?


Odai
3rd Jan 2013, 22:03
Hello,

When I took my first ever lesson in a light aircraft at Manchester back in 2008 (the day MSF closed their doors), I noticed one of the small disposable carbon monoxide detectors stuck to the instrument panel.

Carbon Monoxide Detector - Pack of 5 - Detailed item view - Leading Flight Equipment, Pilot Supplies, Aircraft Equipment, Aviation Headsets (http://proviationshop.co.uk/shop/article_PSGCOD/Carbon-Monoxide-Detector---Pack-of-5.html?shop_param=cid%3D136%26aid%3DPSGCOD%26)

Every lesson I've had since has been with another school, and none of our airplanes have these (or any other) detectors. I've also noticed, from looking around at different schools/FTOs/clubs etc for my future flying, that the use of these detectors is actually quite rare.

I'm just wondering, why is their usage so irregular? How come the use of these is not mandatory in light aircraft if there exists a significant possibility of CO entering the cockpit?

Thanks

Odai.

DavidWoodward
3rd Jan 2013, 22:47
Every aircraft I fly has CO detectors which are changed regularly. It was also part of our oral exam when checking out on different types as to what we'd do if one indicated CO. It's taken seriously at our school/club and rightly so.

tomtytom
3rd Jan 2013, 22:54
The flight school i learnt at and now rent from (westair at blackpool) have them fitted and checked every so often.

Pilot DAR
3rd Jan 2013, 23:11
Flying a single piston plane with no CO detector should be considered abnormal. If the provider of the plane does not install them, you can carry your own, and I would and do.

While right seat in a friend's 150 decades ago, I pretty well passed out from CO, and certainly was in no condition to land the plane, had I been alone. He was less affected (after only 10 minutes of flying), and landed safely. All I remembered was waking up with my face in the beautiful green grass beside the right main wheel, where he had stopped off the runway. He said that my face was very red, but he did not think I'd lost consciousness. I think I did, though he said I got out on my own. I was walking around 15 minutes later, and feeling fine a few hours later. A large crack was found, inside the heat shroud, on the muffler.

It seems it seems it seems that there were no....um..... lasting um...effects of the CO poisoning, but it created a lasting memory! You can buy little dosimeter type detectors, which clip on your pocket. You might look like a nerd walking through dispatch with it on, so clip it on when you get in the plane. I use mine to do a PPM count a few times a year. The background PPM count seems to range from 5 - 10 PPM, irrespective of the cabin heat selection.

I flight tested a Cessna 206 with an 18" belly camera port, and found that during taxi and takeoff, I registered 300 PPM (where a maximum of 50PPM is acceptable). I did not test fly it, or approve it to fly with the port open to the cabin, as had been requested. I later approved an extended exhaust, which discharged aft of the port - problem solved.

Take CO seriously.

Old skool Alex
3rd Jan 2013, 23:36
I wouldn't be to keen flying without a co detecter. The 172 I use has a little carbon monoxide alarm that British gas giveaway velcro taped to the floor.Makes a loud noise and has a test button to check its working.Much better than those tiny circle things that go black in my opinion.

Mark 1
3rd Jan 2013, 23:44
I use the CO Experts type that is mentioned in Mike Busch's article (http://www.avweb.com/news/aeromed/186016-1.html).

It is very sensitive and goes off at 20-30 ppm that I get when taxying with the canopy cracked open. I make a point of reassuring the passengers that it's OK.

I was, however, very glad when it warned me of an exhaust failure bringing CO into the cockpit. Turning off cabin heat and opening the cold air vent soon cleared the cockpit, but without the warning there may have been a different outcome (the alarm beeps were quite audible in a very noisy cockpit).

The card types are not great. Short lived, no alarm and sensitive to other contaminants besides CO, but certainly better than nothing.

2high2fastagain
4th Jan 2013, 07:45
Odai - as the other posters have indicated there ought to be a CO detector in every aircraft. I'd recommend you get your own. I use a digital battery operated detector which I place on the floor when flying. It's interesting to see the CO levels particularly when warming up and in the climb and descent. One alarming thing I found was that a side slip on descent can waft enough exhaust gas (a few hundred ppm) into the cabin to give a real CO poisioning risk and set off the audible alarm. About 40 quid gets you a good alarm. Safe flying!

Pace
4th Jan 2013, 08:14
But its not much good just detecting it especially if you are 30 minutes or more from landing in IMC with an instrument approach before you get down.
Carry a length of plastic tube you can shove through the side window hatch and breath through till landing if CO2 is detected.
It costs a few pence and could save your life the detector will only detect

pace

S-Works
4th Jan 2013, 09:08
I have a disposable detector that is changed every 60 days and a panel mounted CO Guardian that also acts as a clock and altitude O2 monitor etc.

You should not get in any aircraft that does not have CO detection. The archaic heating systems are driven directly my shrouds around the exhaust. Exhausts crack all the time.

Kolossi
4th Jan 2013, 19:03
Can someone suggest where a suitable detector can be bought in the UK at the moment -ideally the Kidde/CO Experts models mention in the avweb article, but at least digital display w/10ppm or less.

I see there is a CO Experts Model 2010, does anyone have any feedback on whether that iss a genuine improvement on the 2002 for GA use - and again a link where to buy would be ideal.

I've spent a fair bit of time googling without any joy, any help very much appreciated :ok:

davydine
4th Jan 2013, 19:49
I was unfortunate enough to witness this accident at Osea island in Essex. I was on a boat, anchored only a couple of hundred yards away and I will never forget watching it spin in to the ground. The cause, CO poisoning. Decent CO detectors are not expensive i find it hard to believe that people wouldn't have one in their aircraft...

http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/dft_avsafety_pdf_507786.pdf

Mark 1
4th Jan 2013, 20:31
does anyone have any feedback on whether that iss a genuine improvement on the 2002 for GA use - and again a link where to buy would be ideal.

I don't have the 2010 model, but it is later than the one in the article. They now have lithium batteries that last the full life of the sensor, so once activated it's good for 5 years than throw away.

I think the company is a very small operation. Probably best to buy direct from Aeromedix (http://www.aeromedix.com/Ultra-Low-Level-CO-Detector-CO-Experts-2014.html). Shipping shouldn't be too much.

Odai
4th Jan 2013, 20:49
I'm actually quite shocked by some of these posts, I've never questioned my school's decision not to use CO detectors on in the airplanes, and have flown nearly 60 hours with them for the PPL training. I guess I simply assumed that the maintenance regime would pick up on any issues that could allow CO to enter the cockpit.

But what's been posted only makes me wonder even more why they aren't mandatory. From davydine's AAIB link:

Safety recommendation 2002-23
The Civil Aviation Authority should develop an appropriate recognised performance specification against which carbon monoxide detectors can be assessed and approved, with the eventual aim of mandating their use on all piston engined aircraft.


That was a long time ago too, and it's still not mandatory.

piperarcher
4th Jan 2013, 21:10
Interesting... Unless you have a very visible / audible digital CO2 monitor, if you use of those small disposable ones then I guess you need to incorporate it into your scan. I have a small supply of those disposable ones and it dawned on me that I hardly check it when I get in the plane, let alone during flight. Maybe it's because it is stuck out of the way on a side window, so I will move it more centrally and try and incorporate it into my scan.

Maoraigh1
4th Jan 2013, 21:24
B&Q Battery monitor with a digital read-out of max. was £30 last month. Loud bleeping if dangerous level is reached. We also have the spot type on the panel - put it amongst the ASI/Altimeter/AH/TC etc, so you don't have to check it - it'll catch your eye if it changes.

Kestrel
6th Jan 2013, 15:16
Odai

Have you actually asked the question to your school, why not just ask them.

Don't take this the wrong way but your going to alienate yourself and have nowhere to fly from.

The detector is not on the MEL list.

No harm asking questions at all but I just feel you almost want to expose schools causing controversy

Just enjoy your flying and chill out

Again I'm not having a go just trying to prevent you from looking like a pain

Mariner9
6th Jan 2013, 15:26
Once mandated, CO detectors will have to be certified, and thus are going to cost £££££ :rolleyes:

cct
6th Jan 2013, 17:16
Not sure how good it is, but at £14.95 with free delivery its got to be worth trying

Kidde 5DCO-0230 BSI Battery Premium Range Carbon Monoxide Alarm with Digital Display: Amazon.co.uk: DIY & Tools

Odai
6th Jan 2013, 20:31
Kestrel, apologies if that's how it came across, it wasn't intentional.

I did actually, very briefly, discuss it with my instructor, but my school wasn't the subject of the question. I don't think there's anything to 'expose', as it isn't illegal and as I mentioned, I've seen other schools do the same. Rather, I am wondering why it isn't mandatory in general.

Although I would still be feeling much better about all the time I've already spent in light aircraft for my PPL if we used CO detectors, having read a little more, in addition to some of the posts in this thread, about how common poisoning can be.

In any case, I've now got a pack of the cheaper disposable ones, which I'd say is better than nothing. I'll be sure to take one along whenever I'm renting from a club that doesn't use them in their airplanes.

I appreciate they're not very long lasting and require a bit more attention to be aware of dangerous CO levels, but that shouldn't be a major issue. What I'd be more concerned about is whether they are reliable in terms of their ability to detect CO. Can anyone confirm if I can rely on them to keep safe? There's no point in saving some money if they don't work as well as the audible alarms in terms of actually picking up on the presence of CO.

With regards to not being mandatory; when there is a significant chance of CO poisoning occuring, and with a number of examples of it happening, some fatal, I'd have thought it would be reasonable to expect something so simple to be standard.

Once mandated, CO detectors will have to be certified, and thus are going to cost £££££

I appreciate red tape has financial implications, but it can't be too bad with the things already being so cheap. Also, while it's no real problem for me, basically having finished the PPL course and thus being in a position to be well aware of all the risks and to take the corresponding precautions, for someone which little or no experience mandating CO detectors can offer protection. When I first started my PPL, I gave no thought at all to the likelihood of CO in the cockpit. And I didn't realise how common poisoning was until I looked into it a bit more having made this thread very recently. I think the same can be said for a lot of things in GA safety, in fact.

I personally certainly would be happier if someone had told me about it when I first started learning to fly. I may well be overreacting in many people's opinion, but I definitely would have taken to using CO detectors right from the start if I had known about the level of risk (which to me, in my own personal view, is too high to accept without trying to mitigate it).

I recently had to spend a fortune in getting reinstated a (class 2) medical certificate that had been suspended by the CAA, preventing me from flying for about 2.5 years. The 'medical' issue concerned was of no significance to flying, and the CAA's opinion of the severity was challenged by each medical professional I consulted. On top of that, had I lived elsewhere, the regulations would have allowed me to fly no problem (the FAA for example). As far as I can tell, there is no record of the issue being remotely relevant to any aviation related incident whatsoever. So for the CAA to consider that sufficient risk to ground me with absurd red tape, but for the risk of CO poisoning to be considered to be too low to mandate any precautions against it when there have been countless documented incidents of it, is irritating to say the least.

/rant

Kolossi
6th Jan 2013, 21:15
Thanks for the link cct. Given the comments and linked docs on the thread I was hoping to find one with a slightly lower alarm threshold than 30ppm. Put whilst I look for a better one, I think £15 to have one sitting on the passenger seat is very worthwhile.

A mate borrowed a plane from the same fleet I rent from a few years back to give his Dad a flight. His dad slept through the flight which he was a bit miffed at, then on short final for no reason he can recall he went around, finally landing (far from a greaser!) and starting to get a splitting headache. You've guessed it - cracked exhaust dumping CO in the cockpit. I think both him and his Dad used up one of their 9 lives that day.

I'd forgotten that story as it was before I started flying lessons, but it came back to me reading this thread, and now with a PPL of my own and having read everything here, it's time for me to take CO more seriously.

If anyone does have a link to a UK supplier of the CO Experts model, I'd still be interested to hear.

riverrock83
6th Jan 2013, 22:16
The CO danger surely comes from either a badly placed exhaust (which is rare as it then shouldn't be certified / permitted) or through the cabin heating system via a crack in the exhaust, with the exhaust fumes getting into the muffler.

If the plane has a water cooled engine then the cabin heating can come off a water pipe, rather than the exhaust, and so the danger is much reduced. Therefore no real need for a CO detector.

What sort of planes have you been flying?

Odai
6th Jan 2013, 22:38
Riverrock83, if that was for me, I did the first half of my PPL on the Grob G115A, the second on the PA28-161 Warrior II.

Shunter
7th Jan 2013, 05:25
We also use a B&Q CO detector. Even had it go off once at very low CO level so nice to know it works and is VERY loud. Fortunately wasn't a structural exhaust problem, but a particular vicious sideslip to the right whilst "keeping it tight" to beat the incoming queue of CAT and avoid 20mins in the hold. Must have been just a tiny amount of exhaust gas gone in through the right-hand wing vent. A chemical detector wouldn't even have registered it.

Maoraigh1
7th Jan 2013, 20:41
and possibly ac with no cabin air heat exchangers on the exhaust pipes.
CO from the exhaust can be sucked into the fuselage at any underside hatch which is not airtight, and build up over time. The most sensitive place for the CO monitor in our Jodel was the rear seat. When moved to the heater air entry, it stopped bleeping. The underfuselage access hatch was not properly sealed. It took over 90 minutes to trigger the alarm.

A and C
7th Jan 2013, 21:03
I can't help asking if the maintenance is being done properly ?

In thirty years of maintenance I have yet to see one of the aircraft maintained by any of the companies that I worked for have a problem.

I would suggest that some of you look at the fasteners on your aircraft exhaust system and mak a judgment as to if the exhaust system has been removed for inspection.

I am not objecting to CO detectors just saying that prevention ( by correct maintenance) is better than cure.

kevkdg
20th Jan 2013, 20:26
What about this One

Fireangel CO-9D Digital Sealed for Life Carbon Monoxide Alarm:Amazon:DIY & Tools

"http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B00441S9GS"

Odai
24th Jan 2013, 20:18
kevkdg, your link is broken. :p

We had a brief (~10-15 min?) indication of CO on my skills test flight (I had taken one of the small chemical type detectors I had purchased). The spot turned dark, and then back to normal after fresh air vents were opened. It was suspected that it could be due to the airplane having been refueled, does anyone know if these things are sensitive to avgas fumes?

There is a warning on the back of the product saying it should not be exposed to halogens, ammoniac or nitrous gases. Any ideas if any of these are present in avgas?

If these detectors are susceptible to being set off by avgas, I think it would be worthwhile to invest in a powered detector instead, as they tend to be less reliant on chemical reactions to pick up on CO.

I've considered this one, linked earlier by cct:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0030BEM0K/

The only thing I'd be concerned about is the distraction that the alarm could cause if it were to go off. I use a similar one in my home, and the alarm is extremely loud - I certainly wouldn't appreciate it going off right next to me in a cockpit, as it could cause a dangerous distraction. There is also the issue of mounting. I'd be happy just to stick some velcro on there and have it stuck to the panel or something - however all my flying will be in rented airplanes and I doubt the owners would appreciate sticky residue (from the velcro) all over the panel.

Is there anything designed specifically for use in GA, other than the Aeromedix one (which is way out of my budget)?

Would appreciate any feedback.

Thanks

Odai.

Fly-by-Wife
24th Jan 2013, 22:54
the alarm is extremely loud - I certainly wouldn't appreciate it going off right next to me in a cockpit, as it could cause a dangerous distraction

Try listening out for it while wearing headphones and with an engine running 5 feet from your ears.

FBW

stevelup
25th Jan 2013, 06:33
We have one of these (http://www.screwfix.com/p/fireangel-7-year-digital-co-alarm/92361).

It's nice and compact and has a 7 year battery. The sounder is just the right volume once you've got your headset on and engine running.

Slopey
25th Jan 2013, 10:14
the alarm is extremely loud - I certainly wouldn't appreciate it going off right next to me in a cockpit, as it could cause a dangerous distraction

I'd rather have the distraction, than a unnoticed transition into unconsciousness and loss of control.

They are loud for a reason, and most of them have a silence button. The point is you KNOW you're in trouble.

Ringway Flyer
27th Jan 2013, 15:44
I have the FireAngel one, in my case via Screwfix (check stock, then go & collect or have delivered). Amazon might be more competitive, tho...

FireAngel 7 Year Digital CO Alarm | Screwfix.com (http://www.screwfix.com/p/fireangel-7-year-digital-co-alarm/92361)

I have to confess that mine was bought for home use, but I'll take with me from now on when flying!

RF:ok:

stickandrudderman
27th Jan 2013, 23:09
I intend to fit one of these in my LAA type:

Aero 455 Family (http://www.guardianavionics.com/455Family.html)

Odai
28th Jan 2013, 01:29
Thanks for the responses guys.

The FireAngel one looks nicely compact, any ideas if this kind of detector would also be susceptible by avgas?

Can I ask also how people are mounting these things in the airplane?

I cannot use any permanent mounting method as I'd only be hiring group aircraft.

Maoraigh1
28th Jan 2013, 19:54
Our one is usually on the rear seat- which is near to where CO from the exhausts can get into a Jodel 1050. The ideal place would be near your face. Buy a pilot's shirt - it'll have attachment points on each shoulder to which it can be fixed.