PDA

View Full Version : Star Navigation instead of GPS


Brilliant Stuff
3rd Jan 2013, 15:18
Okay this might be a stupid question again but I was reading the SR-71 book by Brian Shul and in it he mentions how the SR-71 navigated by looking at the stars.

What stops us from doing the same?

Wife just walked into the room and seems to think it might be the clouds stopping the system from seeing the stars.......

Thoughts?

MarcK
3rd Jan 2013, 16:38
At 80,000 feet you can see the stars in the daytime. And there are no clouds.

Aesir
3rd Jan 2013, 17:46
The Boeing 727 airliner was fitted with a hole in the cockpit roof through which a sextant celestial navigation unit could be fitted. It was an option that could be used if the weather condition would permit.

There is no reason why helicopter pilots would not learn to use a sextant for fun but to use it while flying or include the sextant with all the required books is hardly a good idea :p

Wizzard
3rd Jan 2013, 17:54
The Boeing 727 airliner was fitted with a hole in the cockpit roof

Must have been a b*gger to pressurise :oh:

Aesir
3rd Jan 2013, 18:02
WeŽll an engineer I knew used to have a long piece of 1⅛" hose to vacuum clean the cockpit after coffee & bisquit.

They would usually close the opening when not in use :)

tistisnot
3rd Jan 2013, 18:44
Aesir .... My opening is always closed when not in use..

Remember navigating Salisbury Plain many a time by star - saved having to get out the old prismatic each time but led us into some curious (avoidable!) locations. SWAG method.

Brilliant Stuff
3rd Jan 2013, 18:47
...but the airplane has to come down back to earth one day....

hueyracer
3rd Jan 2013, 18:50
I am using STAR`s every now and then for my navigation-when ATC deems that to be necessary...
:D

Sorry-that one HAD to be.....

Savoia
3rd Jan 2013, 18:53
I think Astro Navigation used to form part of the ATPL syllabus, not sure quiet when it stopped.

Certainly a lot more fun .. bring back the nav dome and Navigation Officer I say! ;)

Helinut
3rd Jan 2013, 19:23
To use stars for navigation, you need to be able to see the stars (or planets). The availability of stars at helicopter altitude in say western Europe would make it considerably less reliable and available than GPS.

Typical astronav accuracy is also MUCH less accurate than GPS.

(Prior to long distance RNAV), for the floaty boys astronav was OK in mid-ocean because an error of 5, 10 or more miles did not matter mid-ocean. And it did not matter too much if you took a couple of days to get a fix in the middle of the Atlantic. If a ship could hit something, they would stick a light on it (those were the days). Astro wouldn't really be good enough for any helicopter ops

vfr440
3rd Jan 2013, 19:27
OK, Sav, showing my age (again)
In the 70s, Northern Quebec, the Baie James Hydro Project, and transition from one site to another required my pilot to accurately plot our position (and thus course to be followed) using a sextant. :bored: Too far North with a vicious angle of dip, & stack of lodestone about made the compass useless (even an E2B, considered state-of-the-art in an Al II - LOL). :E And navigation from those Quebec maps............. you needed a good imagination. All those lakes, except that the profiles from 1500' bore no resemblance whatsoever to the actuals on the ground........ :ugh:

Another time, another (steep) learning curve. Keep the revs up - VFR

Fareastdriver
3rd Jan 2013, 20:04
Years ago when I was on 4 jet bombers I would pass the hours practicing astro nav under the watchful eye of the navigators. The result would be three postion lines called a 'cocked hat' and theoretically you would be in the middle.

They used to use my cocked hats as next week's long range navex.

JimNtexas
3rd Jan 2013, 21:53
The SR-71 (http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/manual/4/4-57.php), the B-58, the FB-111, and most spacecraft used astrotrackers for navigation.

An astrotracker is an optical device connected to a computer (analog in the airplanes and older spacecraft) that can see stars even in daylight and automatically calculate continuous multi-star position fixes which are then fed into the craft's navigation computer. This was probably the best available passive nav system available prior to GPS and laser gyros.

The navigator in the SR-71 didn't use a manual sextant.

9Aplus
3rd Jan 2013, 22:14
Lot of useful info on topic here:

MD-1 Automatic Astro navigation system for B-52 (http://www.prc68.com/I/MD1.shtml)

tottigol
3rd Jan 2013, 22:49
Funny, I play navigation trivia with my students once in a while and find out that most of them have no idea what's the difference between a Mercator and a Lambert projection (hell they don't even know what a Lambert is), not to mention what type of projection an everyday sectional is.:rolleyes:

SASless
3rd Jan 2013, 22:55
But they all know Texaco maps right?

Phone Wind
4th Jan 2013, 07:30
There are those in the US military (and presumably those of other countries) who are concerned that GPS is susceptible to jamming and other single-point failures and that other, back-up systems need to be available. Here's an interesting document written by George H Kaplan of the US Naval Observatory on how new technology in celestial navigation techniques could be used to increase accuracy of inertial navigation systems
New Technology for Celestial Navigation (http://gkaplan.us/content/NewTech.html)

Brilliant Stuff
8th Jan 2013, 11:25
Thanks "Phone Wind" for proving I wasn't completely "barking" with my question....:}:}

rotornut
8th Jan 2013, 12:26
In 1971 I was in the cockpit of an Icelandic Airlines DC-8 crossing the Atlantic. Navigation was by Loran C and a sextant.