PDA

View Full Version : Helicopter pilots 'Not Easily Startled'


Max Shutterspeed
16th Jun 2012, 07:21
Next time the glass cockpit guys with the crisp white shirts are taking the piss because you fly something that needs windscreen wipers, you might like to point them here:

Not all pilots are easily startled, it seems - Learmount (http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/learmount/2012/06/not-all-pilots-are-easily-star.html)

A phenomenon now dubbed "the startle factor" is increasingly a subject of concern among aircraft accident analysts. It describes a seemingly growing tendency for pilots to react illogically to a surprise event.

Air France 447 was an example, as was the Colgan Air Dash 8 stalling event at Buffalo and the recent incident in which an Air Canada pilot who had just woken over-reacted to the presence of nearby traffic that was not a threat.

For lack of another explanation, the current assumption is that modern flight is more rarely punctuated by the unexpected than it used to be, so pilots are more easily startled.

North Sea oil support helicopter pilots seem to be made of sterner stuff.

Consider the May ditching of a Bond Offshore Helicopters EC225LP Super Puma.

It was the right decision, and completely successful, despite the fact that the crew were suddenly bombarded with a plethora of strident warnings and alerts while en route from Aberdeen to the Maersk Resilient platform.

This, according to a UK Air Accident Investigation Branch special bulletin, is what the crew faced "almost simultaneously" while while in the cruise at 3,000ft:

WARN red light and aural gong

MGB.P caption illuminates on the central warning panel (pressure drop in main gear box oil distribution manifold)

CAUT amber light

XMSN caption illuminates on the CWP (transmission)

M.P and S/B.P illuminates on the vehicle monitoring system (oil pressure drop in both main and standby lubrication system)

SHOT illuminated on the MGB control panel (alert to operate the emergency lubrication system)

Zero indication on the MGB oil pressure gauge

CHIP illuminates on the VHM

MGB oil temperature starts to increase

Startled? I would be.

Over to the AAIB's account:

"The commander assumed control of the helicopter, reduced speed toward 80kt IAS, turned back toward the coast and initiated a descent. The crew activated the emergency lubrication system."

But their problems are not over. As the aircraft settles into the descent...

MGB EMLUBE illuminates on the CWP (the emergency MGB lubrication system had failed, for which the drill is to land immediately)

Considering that all 16 people on board a Bond AS332L2 Super Puma died in April 2009 when the MGB failed without warning and the rotor head separated, the crew could have been forgiven for having fairly high adrenaline levels.

AAIB: "The commander briefed the passengers and carried out a controlled ditching."

Easy.

Agaricus bisporus
16th Jun 2012, 08:08
Oh Mr Learmount...

Perhaps there is a world of difference between an aeroplane that is apparently refusing to comply with the laws of aerodynamics and with instruments indicating all sorts of strange and apparently contradictory things and a clear-cut failure corroborated six different ways in an aircraft that is known to be prone to the problem.

It must have been a slow news day in Mr Learmount's office.

Max Shutterspeed
16th Jun 2012, 08:10
Indeed, just read some reports Air France 447. Makes chilling reading.

iamthetroll
16th Jun 2012, 12:01
I had always considered that helicopters, by their nature, fail to comply with the laws of aerodynamics... :p

HeliComparator
16th Jun 2012, 12:06
However, I still think that the crew managed the problem in an exemplary manner, something that might not have been the case with another crew!

Al-bert
16th Jun 2012, 12:12
Helicopter pilots just know (never assume) that if something hasn't gone wrong yet then it's just about to! :eek:

SASless
16th Jun 2012, 14:12
Ask yourself this question......If the Air France Pilots had maintained cruise throttle settings....maintained cruise pitch angle.....maintained heading........what would have been the outcome?

Would not RadAlt and GPS have been other sources of height data? The GPS would have been giving them Ground Speed....which if they had been monitoring that they would have had a rough idea of airspeed. Remember they were over the ocean nearly in the middle of the Atlantic....heck for that matter....would not OAT have been a rough guide to Altitude?

What was the weather ahead of them......good enough for a Visual Descent and Landing?

Rule one in all emergencies is "THINK!"

puntosaurus
16th Jun 2012, 16:58
I think it's a little invidious to suggest that there's a difference between fixed wing and helicopter pilots abilities, and I agree it must have been a slow day in Mr Learmount's office. For every AF447, there's a US1549, and for every REDW there's.... well you take your pick of the 'Doh!' moments recorded by the AAIB for helicopters.

SASless
16th Jun 2012, 17:18
We don't startle easily.....yeah right! Slam a door near a helicopter pilot and watch him jump out of his shoes!

Floppy Link
16th Jun 2012, 18:47
...and those of us who've done SAR and/or air ambulance can be startled from sweet dreams to wide awake in a nanosecond if the ringtone is right...:eek:

diginagain
16th Jun 2012, 20:47
Maintaining a high state of anticipation is everything - as anyone who has flown early versions of Lynx will probably tell you.

MightyGem
16th Jun 2012, 21:34
Ask yourself this question......If the Air France Pilots had maintained cruise throttle settings....maintained cruise pitch angle.....maintained heading........what would have been the outcome?
My thoughts as well. It was drummed into me from the early days of my flying career, when flying gliders: attitude, attitude. Get that right and everything else follows.

ShyTorque
16th Jun 2012, 21:48
...and those of us who've done SAR and/or air ambulance can be startled from sweet dreams to wide awake in a nanosecond if the ringtone is right...

Yes, it's been nearly fifteen years since my last SAR night callout but certain phone ringtones are still banned from this house! :eek:

wiggy
16th Jun 2012, 21:54
SASless

If the Air France Pilots had maintained cruise throttle settings....maintained cruise pitch angle.....maintained heading........what would have been the outcome

In attempt to condense several hundred pages of threads elsewhere - We know the probable outcome if they had done that, but some are claiming that holding current pitch attitude was not the procedure being taught at the time of the accident ( I don't know why not, and we all know pulling to 15 degree pitch at high level wasn't taught either).

Would not RadAlt and GPS have been other sources of height data?

Rad Alt - not at high level, e.g. on the 747/777 Rad Alt only live below 2500 feet.

GPS altitude - AFAIK not usually available/displayed on most Widebody Flight decks.

The GPS would have been giving them Ground Speed....which if they had been monitoring that they would have had a rough idea of airspeed.


Rough, yes, but they were close to their ceiling and in/near the ITCZ, so a rough idea may not have been any use at all, especially if windspeed/direction was changing rapidly.


......would not OAT have been a rough guide to Altitude?

Perhaps, perhaps not, but fundamentally altitude wasn't their problem until very late in the game, whereas Angle of Attack very much was ...and the AF447 crew had no direct display of that information.

IMHO a combination of startle factor/ poor training/ poor procedures may be an explanation for the initial pitch excursion on AF447 but IMHO (again) once that aircraft had zoomed above it's ceiling and entered the stall, with added complication that the stab had automatically run LE down, I'm not sure many pilots, startled or not, white shirts or not, fixed wing or rotary, would have recovered the situation.

(BTW for the OP - even the likes of 747s and 777s have windscreen wipers :E )

Fareastdriver
17th Jun 2012, 07:04
Anybody who works for a helicopter company wouldn't be surprised by anything.

Sillypeoples
17th Jun 2012, 21:28
Probably has more to do with hiring 'standards' these days. Hire kids that can only read checklists, then when something happens outside the checklist...'startle'.

hoodie
17th Jun 2012, 22:38
We don't startle easily.....yeah right! Slam a door near a helicopter pilot and watch him jump out of his shoes!

http://aviationhumor.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/AirplaneJokes-0017.jpg

Cptben
17th Jun 2012, 23:22
With regards to the main rotor head stepperation on the bond super puma in the unfortunate April 2009 incident. Is rotor head sepperation something that can occur on any RW aircraft, I fly fixed wing however have never herd of this for example on a Jet b206.

Cheers !

B

SASless
18th Jun 2012, 00:04
There was a time when the Jet Box was very new....the entire MGB and Rotor system would depart the aircraft. It had to do with transmission mounts failing.

Cptben
18th Jun 2012, 00:21
So it's more to do with manufacture differences in putting the aircraft to get her ect. Thanks !

B

fijdor
18th Jun 2012, 00:38
"There was a time when the Jet Box was very new....the entire MGB and Rotor system would depart the aircraft. It had to do with transmission mounts failing."


That, would startled me, me think :confused: :ooh:

JD

krypton_john
18th Jun 2012, 04:46
The B206 can, and I am certain has lost its rotor through both mast bumping and TT strap failure.

Al-bert
18th Jun 2012, 07:23
Drag damper failure in a German CH53 mid '70s was pretty terminal too. :eek:

albatross
18th Jun 2012, 09:35
TT strap fails - blade departs - massive out of balance - transmission rips out - all happened in an instant.
Happened in Quebec once in the early 70s.

Helinut
18th Jun 2012, 10:49
Wings fall off aeroplanes too, just less often.

lelebebbel
18th Jun 2012, 12:42
Wings fall off aeroplanes too, just less often.

Usually only once