PDA

View Full Version : Minor landing mishap


aileron_69
5th Mar 2011, 06:48
What was the "minor landing mishap" by an american airforce aircraft last night at Melbourne Airport that caused a few aircraft to be delayed while the runway was inspected? There appeared to be a lot of fire engines running around out there but couldnt make out what they were up to in the dark.

bentleg
5th Mar 2011, 08:25
The B1 that did the display at Avalon Friday night had a hydraulic problem which meant he had to land flapless. The fire tenders came out at Avalon briefly, but the pilot decided to divert to Tulla, probably for the longer runway.

The B1 came back to Avalon at about 6 pm tonight - landing with flaps extended.

Lookleft
5th Mar 2011, 08:40
If my memory is still reliable didn't something similar happen the last time the B1 came to Avalon? Maybe they need to issue a NOTAM for 20 minutes traffic due aging strike bomber within 50nm radius Tullamarine airport.

Dangnammit
5th Mar 2011, 08:51
I was in Airport West at 5pm today and saw the B1 take off and turn toward Avalon. Seemed to climb pretty high to go 'down the road'. Perhaps did a test or two.

For some reason the aircraft isn't displayed on webtrack, although the decibel meter turns red with 85 decibels at 5:02pm.

bentleg
5th Mar 2011, 08:57
If my memory is still reliable didn't something similar happen the last time the B1 came to Avalon?

Yep. Last airshow 2009 one of the B1's decided to land at Tulla (can't remember why) and blew a tyre. They had to take a wheel off the other B1 at Avalon to retrieve the aircraft from Tulla.

chimbu warrior
5th Mar 2011, 10:40
aging strike bomber

Say what you like about it, but it is an extremely graceful looking machine. Looks beautiful in a climbing turn. :ok:

Peter Fanelli
5th Mar 2011, 11:11
Maybe they need to issue a NOTAM for 20 minutes traffic due aging strike bomber within 50nm radius Tullamarine airport.


Hey at least we have some bombers.

Centaurus
5th Mar 2011, 13:12
Maybe they need to issue a NOTAM for 20 minutes traffic due aging strike bomber within 50nm radius Tullamarine airport.

Actually, the AFAP of 1989 fame did that to Air Nauru back in 1988 when the chief pilot of Air Nauru did a runner and left the company without a chief pilot.

So the AFAP (very militant in those long gone days) isued a directive that because Air Nauru was deemed by the AFAP to be "unsafe" without a chief pilot, no AFAP crewed aircraft (all Ansett and Australian Airlines) were to be flying within 50 miles of any Air Nauru aircraft arriving or departing within Australia. No NOTAM for that of course. It cost the Aussie airlines a lot of money because of the delays caused. Air Nauru 737's had all this 50 mile airspace surrounding Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne to themselves for take off and landings. Maybe same restriction could be applied to visiting B1's with dodgy flaps:ok:

TBM-Legend
5th Mar 2011, 20:33
AFAP = brain dead if they actually did that. Who were they penalising? Only the travelling public who pays their way...

bankrunner
6th Mar 2011, 04:12
Air Nauru 737's had all this 50 mile airspace surrounding Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne to themselves for take off and landings.

While crap for the travelling public, Ansett, Australian and their employees, it'd make flying for Air Nauru into a pretty decent gig. Fly into SY at 8am on a Monday morning and have the whole place to yourself :ok:

bankrunner
6th Mar 2011, 10:58
For some reason the aircraft isn't displayed on webtrack, although the decibel meter turns red with 85 decibels at 5:02pm.


Wonder what it would've said had ATC said something to the effect of "cleared direct to Avalon, not above 2000" :ok:

bagchucka
6th Mar 2011, 11:18
but the pilot decided to divert to Tulla, probably for the longer runway

you know you're stuggling when 10,000ft of bitumen doesn't cut the mustard.

PyroTek
6th Mar 2011, 13:20
Imagine the media if it had a red tail with a kangaroo on it!:ugh:

Critical Reynolds No
6th Mar 2011, 22:58
Chimbo said:
Say what you like about it, but it is an extremely graceful looking machine. Looks beautiful in a climbing turn.

Sure does and loud. Found this on the web from Friday night:

xJK4ftA_UQU

David75
7th Mar 2011, 03:31
Imagine the media if it had a red tail with a kangaroo on it!:ugh:


Maybe a B1 is what QANTAS needs to address the media rather than a group of PR people.