PDA

View Full Version : Overseas Alternate Requirements.


arrow28
3rd Dec 2010, 15:41
Can anybody advise how Oz operators determine whether one has to plan an alternate when operating overseas. We are just about to start overseas charters but unlike Oz there is nothing on the approach plates to indicate when one needs to plan an alternate.

Some pilots think that if the destination has an ILS, weather below the non precision approach minima requires an alternate and if it only has non precision approaches weather below circling minima requires an alternate.

I can't find anything in the AIP's, does anybody have answers to this? The company has not provided any info on this.

Thanks

arrow

waren9
3rd Dec 2010, 16:02
Start with the "AIP" of the country your destination is in. It is also likely that CASA will require you have an alternate, atleast initially. Whatever is the most restrictive of either state will probably apply.

Tmbstory
3rd Dec 2010, 16:57
Arrow 28:

It is normal requirement to plan either one or two alternates when overseas.
Look at an international Flight Plan. You plan an alternate for weather or single runway reasons.

Tmb

#1AHRS
4th Dec 2010, 06:35
Here is a slightly different slant on things. In NZ it is a rule (part 91) not an AIP requirement and basically it states that you always have to carry an alternate unless the weather is above certain specification, where you can (if you wish) depart without an alternate.

Aussie, it is an AIP requirement and it assumes that you always go without an alternate unless the weather goes below a certain spec.

Both achieve essentially the same result but have been derived from different mentality. However in NZ it is a rule and that has teeth above an information pubication.

In Aussie you say "I have to carry an alternate today" and in NZ you would say "today I can go without an alternate".

Skynews
4th Dec 2010, 06:58
How long does it take to fly from the bottom of the south island to the top of the north, I am guessing you fly a dash-8 or similar?

Beyond tha Threshold
4th Dec 2010, 07:34
If your are to fly overseas won't you need an AOC to reflect that?
In which case you will need an approved operations manual to document your overseas procedures.

Have a closer look at AIP DAP. From memory add 500' and 2000m vis to your second lowest circling approach minimas for that port.

A closer look at PANS OPS may also assist.

Beyond.

Checkboard
4th Dec 2010, 10:09
When you hire a car in, say the USA, do you drive according to Australian road rules, or American ones? Obviously you must obey the local road rules.

Aviation is no different. You must abide by the LOCAL regulations when you operate in the airspace of another country - so for your overseas operation you must source the local documents as part of the cost/effort of operating. Most of them are available free online, however.

The European requirement (EU-OPS 1.290 (c) (http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/818.pdf)) reads, in part:
(c) An operator must select at least one destination alternate for each IFR flight unless:

1. both:
(i) the duration of the planned flight from take-off to landing or, in the event of in-flight re-planning in accordance with OPS 1.255(d), the remaining flying time to destination does not exceed six hours, and

(ii) two separate runways (see OPS 1.192) are available and usable at the destination aerodrome and the appropriate weather reports or forecasts for the destination aerodrome, or any combination thereof, indicate that for the period from one hour before until one hour after the expected time of arrival at the destination aerodrome, the ceiling will be at least 2 000 ft or circling height + 500 ft, whichever is greater, and the visibility will be at least 5 km; or

2. the destination aerodrome is isolated.

(d) An operator must select two destination alternate aerodromes when:

1. the appropriate weather reports or forecasts for the destination aerodrome, or any combination thereof, indicate that during a period commencing one hour before and ending one hour after the estimated time of arrival, the weather conditions will be below the applicable planning minima (see OPS 1.297(b)); or

2. no meteorological information is available.

Note: "two alternates" means you must have a choice of two alternates available arriving at your destination - effectively you must plan fuel for the second closest (i.e. not fuel for an "alternate for the alternate")

Some pilots think that if the destination has an ILS, weather below the non precision approach minima requires an alternate and if it only has non precision approaches weather below circling minima requires an alternate.
According to the rules, above, if your destination has weather above the minima for the best available approach - you plan ONE alternate.

If your destination has weather below the landing minima, you plan for TWO alternates (ie. not the closest, but the next closest). The alternates planned must have weather above "the second best approach" - if you are CAT3, that means CAT1 minima, if you are CAT1 (or only CAT1 is available), that means the VOR or NDB minima etc.

If the flight is less than 6 hours (basically local European) AND the destination has multiple runways (not crossing in such a way that both would be closed for an incident) then you can go without an alternate but with increased reserves (an extra 15 minutes @ 1500'). Most European ports are so close that carrying alternate fuel isn't limiting in any effective way. The only city I even contemplate not carrying an alternate is Madrid (in the centre of Spain, with every other airport situated around the coast it has the longest diversion distances.)

#1AHRS
4th Dec 2010, 18:48
How long does it take to fly from the bottom of the south island to the top of the north, I am guessing you fly a dash-8 or similar?

NZ is about 2 hours long in a jet, your point? Was a Dash 10 year ago, G550 now based in Europe.

maralinga
5th Dec 2010, 04:06
Consideration also needs to be given to the airspace design criteria. If the country is US aligned they may be operating with TERPS instead of PAN-OPS. There are large differences, especially for circling approaches. There are also quite notable differences between states who use PAN-OPS.

neville_nobody
5th Dec 2010, 05:03
Unless it states something in your ops manual, the laws of the country you are flying into apply to your fuel/alternate status.