Report when visual
20th Aug 2010, 13:57
When military airspace was H24, it used to take 1 NOTAM to advise deactivation of AMB airspace, 1 each for R725 and R677 and 1 for the lower levels of EVD (R641) airpace with an occasional 2nd NOTAM for the larger EVD airspace.
Now that we are no longer H24 (in order to provide a more flexible use of airspace) it now takes 10 (I say again) 10 NOTAMS to activate AMB airspace, 9 to activate R626 (west) and 8 to activate R637 (over water). R641 now takes a minimum of 3 NOTAMS depending on the airspace configuration.
Any wonder VCAs have increased?
Additionally, because (in the interests of "flexible use of airspace") the western and over water area notams often need to be reviewed (due to acft delays or early finishes) the NOF are getting slammed with review requests for up to 18 NOTAM reviews at a time!
They have now instructed that if the airspace is no longer required within 30 mins of NOTAM cancellation time, they will not amend the NOTAM and it just has to time expire.
BN centre can not accept airspace releases due to the wonderful alphabet airspace system (when MIL airspace is NOTAMd active it is class C - the same airspace when deact is a mix of C, E and G, my understanding is that BN centre are not permitted to control C class where they would normally provide E or G).
Additionally, APP supervisors, who used to actually supervise and mentor junior controllers, now spend a large portion of their time raising, checking, reviewing, rechecking and cancelling NOTAMs.
Apparently the reason for the volume of NOTAMs is that activation NOTAMs can not be grouped unless they have the same vertical dimensions. How is it less confusing to have 10 NOTAMS (each for differing vertical volumes) than 1 NOTAM spelling out he entire arspace volume activation times? (eg AMB CTR and R620ABCDEF active).
A quick look at airspace maps or the DAH will advise the lower and upper levels for each section of airspace.
I'm only using AMB as an example, other bases also have an inordinate volume of NOTAMs required to activate airspace each day. Anyone else had enough of this new "leap forward"? :ugh:
Now that we are no longer H24 (in order to provide a more flexible use of airspace) it now takes 10 (I say again) 10 NOTAMS to activate AMB airspace, 9 to activate R626 (west) and 8 to activate R637 (over water). R641 now takes a minimum of 3 NOTAMS depending on the airspace configuration.
Any wonder VCAs have increased?
Additionally, because (in the interests of "flexible use of airspace") the western and over water area notams often need to be reviewed (due to acft delays or early finishes) the NOF are getting slammed with review requests for up to 18 NOTAM reviews at a time!
They have now instructed that if the airspace is no longer required within 30 mins of NOTAM cancellation time, they will not amend the NOTAM and it just has to time expire.
BN centre can not accept airspace releases due to the wonderful alphabet airspace system (when MIL airspace is NOTAMd active it is class C - the same airspace when deact is a mix of C, E and G, my understanding is that BN centre are not permitted to control C class where they would normally provide E or G).
Additionally, APP supervisors, who used to actually supervise and mentor junior controllers, now spend a large portion of their time raising, checking, reviewing, rechecking and cancelling NOTAMs.
Apparently the reason for the volume of NOTAMs is that activation NOTAMs can not be grouped unless they have the same vertical dimensions. How is it less confusing to have 10 NOTAMS (each for differing vertical volumes) than 1 NOTAM spelling out he entire arspace volume activation times? (eg AMB CTR and R620ABCDEF active).
A quick look at airspace maps or the DAH will advise the lower and upper levels for each section of airspace.
I'm only using AMB as an example, other bases also have an inordinate volume of NOTAMs required to activate airspace each day. Anyone else had enough of this new "leap forward"? :ugh: