RAT 5
13th Jul 2010, 08:56
This is a question regarding pitch trim settings with different de-rate thrusts. 1 operator uses a basic loadsheet trim setting. For 26k & 24K de-rates this is adjusted with a -ve figure, for 22K it is adjusted with a +ve figure. I was told this is because of the effect of underwing engines. More thrust gives a more nose up pitch and thus needs less nose up trim. I believed this explanation, but can not guarantee its truth.
I start my question with an assumption: you derate 22K, assumed temp or not, so that the thrust setting matches the ATOW. The elevtaor trim is adjusted +ve from the loadsheet. Now you decide to use 24K or 26K and greater assumed temp to also achieve a thrust = ATOW. My assumption is that the thrust derived in all cases is the same, as it matches ATOW. However, in the latter cases the elevator trim is adjusted -ve from the load sheet, the former it is a +ve adjustment. If the thrust given is the same then both trim settings can not be correct. Is my assumption correct, and if it is, what's the answer about the trim?
I start my question with an assumption: you derate 22K, assumed temp or not, so that the thrust setting matches the ATOW. The elevtaor trim is adjusted +ve from the loadsheet. Now you decide to use 24K or 26K and greater assumed temp to also achieve a thrust = ATOW. My assumption is that the thrust derived in all cases is the same, as it matches ATOW. However, in the latter cases the elevator trim is adjusted -ve from the load sheet, the former it is a +ve adjustment. If the thrust given is the same then both trim settings can not be correct. Is my assumption correct, and if it is, what's the answer about the trim?