King Air crash at Egelsbach Airfield (EDFE)

[eivissa]

News say the aircraft crashed at 1515 UTC into a forest east of EDFE, while approaching runway 27.
Rescue services are on scene and still fighting the fire.

Lets hope for a good outcome and no one was injured.

Google News: Sportflugzeug nach Start abgestrzt (http://news.google.de/news/story?pz=1&cf=all&ned=de&cf=all&ncl=djk0Jzyd1m0I7NMJEubZkex72IXfM)

[eivissa]

The departure aerodrome was Bremen Airport.

[eivissa]

The aircraft was a Beechcraft King Air 90 on an IFR flight from Bremen to Egelsbach. IFR had been cancelled just prior to the crash for a VFR approach at Egelsbach. The pilot hadn't reported any problems to ATC.

[eivissa]

TV footage shows the machine scattered into many pieces. Still no mention of POB or survivors.

[eivissa]

Police now mentions three POB. No mention of survivors.

[ab33t]

Dont seem to find much on this in the media.

[His dudeness]

Not too much left... RIP

Offenbar mehrere Tote bei Flugzeugabsturz - Egelsbach - Lokalmeldungen - Lokales - op-online.de (http://www.op-online.de/nachrichten/egelsbach/offenbar-mehrere-tote-flugzeugabsturz-551399.html)

Egelsbach: Flugzeug stürzt ins Waldgebiet | Frankfurter Rundschau - Top-News (http://www.fr-online.de/top_news/?em_cnt=2128553&em_src=775448&em_ivw=fr_regtop)

3 Tote in Egelsbach: Flugzeug stürzt beim Landeanflug ab! - Frankfurt - Frankfurt - Bild.de (http://www.bild.de/BILD/regional/frankfurt/aktuell/2009/12/08/flugzeug-absturz/3-tote-beim-landeanflug-in-egelsbach.html)

[Chally604]

Anybody knows the registration?

Thanks

[9gmax]

accdg to aviation safety it is D-IDVK

ASN Aircraft accident 07-DEC-2009 Beechcraft F90 King Air D-IDVK (http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=70329)

rip

[plugster]

D-IDVK
saw it some days ago in the mx shop. strange feeling to see parts of the wreckage

[Badente]

These are the METARs for Egelsbach (EDFE) and Frankfurt/Main (EDDF, ~5NM NW of EDFE) around the time of the accident (1516Z):


EDFE 071620Z AUTO 10004KT //// R27/1400VP2000U // /// 05/05 Q1011
EDFE 071550Z AUTO 09003KT //// // /// 05/05 Q1011
EDFE 071520Z 09004KT 5000 BR FEW005 SCT010 BKN250 06/06 Q1012
EDFE 071450Z 08002KT 5000 BR FEW005 SCT010 BKN250 06/06 Q1012
EDFE 071420Z 09002KT 5000 BR FEW005 SCT010 BKN250 07/07 Q1012
EDFE 071350Z 33002KT 4000 BR SCT005 BKN008 07/07 Q1012

EDDF 071620Z 08003KT 1200 R25L/1100VP2000D R25R/P2000N BR FEW001 BKN002 05/05 Q1011 NOSIG
EDDF 071550Z VRB02KT 8000 SCT005 SCT060 BKN250 06/06 Q1012 NOSIG
EDDF 071520Z VRB02KT 8000 FEW004 BKN006 07/06 Q1012 NOSIG
EDDF 071450Z 36003KT 8000 FEW004 BKN008 BKN250 06/06 Q1012 BECMG SCT008
EDDF 071420Z 05002KT 8000 SCT004 BKN250 07/06 Q1012 NOSIG
EDDF 071350Z 03002KT 9999 FEW004 SCT006 BKN250 07/06 Q1013 NOSIG

The Egelsbach Airport website (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/index.en.html) provides some AIP excerpts (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/pilotinfo_aip.en.html) for reference like the visual operations charts for HPA (Overview (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/_img/aip/dfs_07.jpg) and Detail (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/_img/aip/dfs_08.jpg)). There is no instrument approach into EDFE and an unusual airspace structure due to EDDF close by. The AIP requires minimum 3km visibility and 1000ft ceiling (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/_img/aip/dfs_01.gif). Additionally there is no ATC. Only FIS is provided. Max ALT during Approach (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/_img/aip/dfs_02.gif) is 1500ft MSL due to EDDF airspace above. The Frankfurt-Egelsbach Operations for High Performance Aircraft - How to get there and away again (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/_downloads/de/EDFE_HPA.pdf) (pdf) also make for an interesting read.

Aircraft in question possibly Beechcraft F90 King Air D-IDVK according to ASN (http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=70329).

Judged from this footage (http://www.hr-online.de/website/rubriken/nachrichten/indexhessen34938.jsp?key=standard_document_38419203&seite=1&jmpage=1&type=v&rubrik=36082&jm=2&mediakey=fs/allgemein/20091207_absturz) of the accident scene (German, source: Hessischer Rundfunk) it looks like a high energy impact to me.

-Badente

[eivissa]

We were able to take some pictures today...

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/2905/07122009018.jpg
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3189/07122009027.jpg
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/7089/07122009030e.jpg
http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/6459/07122009037.jpg
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/7448/07122009039.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7862/07122009046.jpg

[eivissa]

First person found dead in the cabin. The two others are expected to be still in the cabin which is partly buried into the ground.

Some eyewitnesses say the aircraft exploded in the air, before impact!

Others say it became very slow and lost height rapidly until it struck the trees and exploded on the ground.

Fact is, weather was foggy yesterday and visibilitys changed often and sudden.

[plugster]

let's wait for the official report

[jetopa]

Looking at the METARs above I am scratching my head, asking why the ceiling at Egelsbach could be so different from Frankfurt? They're only a few km's away from each other...

However, what mystifies me is the fact why anybody would even try an approach to a VFR airfield under the given conditions.:ugh:

Stunts like these have gone wrong in the past and they will continue to do so in the future.

[His dudeness]

Looking at the METARs above I am scratching my head, asking why the ceiling at Egelsbach could be so different from Frankfurt? They're only a few km's away from each other...

Really? I´m based at EDFM and ETOR is just 1 nm further than EDDF is from EDFE. We sometimes are CAVOK whilst ETOR is fogged in or visa versa.
Called microclimate me thinks. The intensive traffic both air and ground around EDDF has its impact.

However, what mystifies me is the fact why anybody would even try an approach to a VFR airfield under the given conditions

Well VFR is VFR, meaning you go there and look it up. I´ve landed often in conditions that looked on paper pretty bad, but where in good in reality.(and vice versa) I remember a flight in a Cherokee from a small field to EDDS, where the first half of the runway was invisible, RVR 100m and the other half was in the open, clear sky.
I landed, perfectly safe and legal, whilst commercial airliners couldn´t (that was before the runway was moved)

Back to EDFE, I think operations there could be safer, if ATC would offer an exit strategy IF VFR is lost during the approach (sorts of a missed approach procedure) - the workload is skyhigh at that time even without having to go back to Langen and ask to pickup IFR again with all that traffic into Frankfurt around you.

IF we need to speculate, I´d say that probably both looked outside and none on the ASI. The F90 is a nice airplane but stall recovery at low altitude isn´t on of her strong points. Due to the lack of CVR and FDR we probably will never know what really happened.

[eivissa]

I have talked to one of the Langen ATC guys and they were able to look at the radar data of the flight. He said on their screens it looks like there was no trouble with the aircraft until impact. A steady and calm approach right into the forest.

EDFE and EDDF do often have differences in METAR/TAF data.

[jetopa]

Your Dudeness,

I am not debating your experience of flying in and out of VFR airfields in 'Schermoney'. Nor do I want to get in an argument about who's more knowledgeable.

You're right, some WX-values can change rapidly over a given distance. And - believe me - I have my share of flights that started or ended with a VFR-portion ('Z-' or 'Y-flightplans', if I remember correctly), even if it's a long time ago and I'm glad that I don't have to do this any more on a daily basis.

The point I'm trying to make is merely this: far too many pilots press on in marginal weather, lowering their limits as they go along and the poor passengers behind (or next to) them or the non-flying public on the ground are suffering the consequences from their marginal judgement.

[Crosswind Limits]

Any photos of the crash site in relation to the airport?

[inbalance]

Pictures from Google Earth incl. the Flighttrack


Egelsbach (Hosted by PictureUpload.de) (http://www.pictureupload.de/Egelsbach-gid36583.html)

[His dudeness]

I am not debating your experience of flying in and out of VFR airfields in 'Schermoney'. Nor do I want to get in an argument about who's more knowledgeable.

I didn´t mean to make my post to a 'I know more than you' one. I thought my example of Coleman and Mannheim was not soo bad either, since Coleman is in the woods, bit like Egelsbach and Mannheim has a lot of Roads and City around it, just like Frank N.Furter.

You're right, some WX-values can change rapidly over a given distance. And - believe me - I have my share of flights that started or ended with a VFR-portion ('Z-' or 'Y-flightplans', if I remember correctly), even if it's a long time ago and I'm glad that I don't have to do this any more on a daily basis.

I´m not doing this too often any more, thanks god, the more you do it, the relaxter you get, which is really the wrong thing to be at marginal VFR...
So I concur.

The point I'm trying to make is merely this: far too many pilots press on in marginal weather, lowering their limits as they go along and the poor passengers behind (or next to) them or the non-flying public on the ground are suffering the consequences from their marginal judgement.

Absolutely correct. And it be the reason for this accident, HOWEVER at this stage - and probably without the CVR/FDR also later we don´t and won´t know what happened exactly. I´ve seen people do stupid things in cockpits (INCLUDING myself - I guess you know that feeling, when the adrenaline rushes through the system....), still I thought that the mere METAR alone does not explain to much. That was the sole aim of my post. You probably took more from it than intended.

[eckhard]

I have now had a chance to look through the High Performance Aircraft (HPA) procedures for Egelsbach as published by the German Authorities. I have compared this information with the profile of the C90 (as released on Pprune and therefore not in any way official); nevertheless, I feel that some interesting conclusions can be made.

A worrying aspect is that the HPA procedures themselves have a couple of important inconsistencies. Page 7 (Required waypoint pattern and procedures) shows the lat and long for H1, H2 and H3. I plotted these positions on Google Earth, as well as the threshold of RWY 27 and also the impact point of the C90.

Page 8 (Section of flight path on straight-in 27 approach) shows the distance of H1 as 18nm from the threshold, whereas I made it 16nm (where they have put a red blob at the TOD from 3450ft). More worryingly, they have published a slope of 150ft/nm from 1350ft at 9 miles down to the threshold. This would be correct if the threshold was at sea level, but the actual airfield elevation is 385ft. Taking this into account, the actual required descent gradient from 1350ft at 9nm is only 107ft/nm. If you followed the recommended slope of 150ft/nm, you would impact the terrain at about 4nm, 600ft amsl. This corresponds with the position of H3, which is missing from page 8 of the HPA document.

The C90 impact point was at 2.2nm from the threshold, at an elevation of approx 640ft amsl, or 255ft above the airfield elevation. If he started his descent from 9nm and 1350ft as published, he would have had an average descent gradient of 104ft/nm, almost exactly the same as the 'required' gradient of 107ft/nm. This implies that he could have calculated the required profile for a constant descent approach and perhaps used some VNAV or VS display to follow it. Unfortunately, the terrain rises towards the east from the threshold of RWY 27. Of course, this is only one possibility and the actual flight path may have been quite different, but the point of impact is consistent with this hypothesis.

This means that it is virtually impossible to follow a constant descent profile from 9nm and 1350ft without impacting the terrain. This is due to the rising ground to the east of the airfield.

In my opinion, The published profile on page 8 is dangerous and misleading. A colleague of mine had an 'unexplained' EGPWS alert on a previous visit in daylight CAVOK. I now wonder whether this profile could have been responsible?

A much safer option would be to maintain 1350ft from 9nm until 3nm (i.e. 1nm past H3) and then commence a standard 3 degree descent. This equates to 320ft/nm or 5.2% which is the same as a standard ILS glidepath. You are only 965ft above the airfield at this point, so gear and land flap should be extended prior to this point and a VS of approx 600fpm 'dialled in' if you have a groundspeed of 120kts. As there is a slight delay while the Autoflight system achieves the selected VS, it may be worth commencing this process at 3.3nm so that the aircraft actually leaves 1350ft at 3nm.

As always, a picture is worth a thousand words, so I attach my interpretation of the data as an aide to understanding what I have said above.

This is, of course, purely my own take on what happened and what has been published by the German Authorities and on Pprune. It may be that I have omitted some important fact or detail which will render my views obsolete. I have to say that I am worried by the misleading profile published by the German authorities on page 8 of the HPA guidance.

The bottom line is: Always try to fly a standard 3 degree slope on final approach if at all possible! Also, always use all available aids (Rad Alt, DME, GPS, FMS) to enhance situational awareness, whatever the weather.

Kind regards, Eckhard.

Imageshack - page7ky - Uploaded by eckhard747 (http://img40.imageshack.us/i/page7ky.jpg/)

Imageshack - page8o - Uploaded by eckhard747 (http://img191.imageshack.us/i/page8o.jpg/)

Imageshack - egelsbachapproachprofil - Uploaded by eckhard747 (http://img136.imageshack.us/i/egelsbachapproachprofil.jpg/)

[plugster]

The safest option would be the german authorities permitting GPS approaches on uncontrolled airfields like anywhere else in the world. It's not rocket science guys...

[His dudeness]

Don´t know if I should agree...

First of all, regardless of what we think, EDFE is still a pure VFR field. If I´m VFR, I maintain VFR with a plan what to do if can´t stay VFR.

Secondly, I read somewhere that the aircraft (a F90 not a C90 btw) was based in EDFE, so I´d think the pilots knew the terrain etc. Workload is usally very high in these situation, I don´t know the particular aircraft, but have flown similar ones and if this one wasn´t retrofitted, we´d talk about a standalone GPS not necessarely connected to the F/D, at least no vertical guidance apart from VS. Now in such a scenario it just takes a small distraction to bring you behind the airplane, close to the ground with little margin as one can see from the 'official' profile. Therefore point one reapplies.

Thirdly, I do like the HPA and that the profile is available, that is a good information source to me (the airspace structure could be more accomodating, but thats another topic). I don´t find it misleading, although I see your point.
Again its VFR.
If you look up the webpage of EDFE, under this link you can virtually fly the arrivals with hints to airspace etc.

Frankfurt Egelsbach Airport : Virtual arrival (http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/pilotinfo_arrival.en.html)

I remember flying into EDFE in Bravos, KingAirs etc without the HPA at night with very very tight turns in the pattern. THAT was dangerous. In marginal wx I ended up more than once in EDDF where the HPA probably would have seen me landing. (bit of a generalization I know)

I already said that without a CVR and a FDR it is unlikely that we will get a precise cause unless an failure in avionic or airframe can be found....
To me, with hindsight and all the time to 'judge', it looks like the classical CFIT under 'getheritis pressure'. :(

[what next]

Good morning!

plugster: The safest option would be the german authorities permitting GPS approaches on uncontrolled airfields like anywhere else in the world. It's not rocket science guys...

There are enough published GPS approaches into uncontrolled airfields in Germany. More than in many other parts of the world (just ask our colleagues in the UK!). One of my weekly destinations (in Germany...) has only this kind of instrument approach. And no control zone like in EDFE, just class F airspace. And the authorities are permitting it. Have been for many years already. So really, don't blame those you are not at fault.

IFR approaches, including GPS, into Egelsbach have been discussed for many, many, many years already. Just ask your friend Google about it. (This german language article from PuF here is from 2006 but still contains some valid points: http://www.pilotundflugzeug.de/servlet/use/Home.class?frame&main={http://www.pilotundflugzeug.de/artikel/2006-11-26/Luftraum_Egelsbach}).

From what I heard about this accident, the clouds were below the typical minimum for GPS approaches anyway, so a legal approach wouldn't have been possible.

Greetings, Max

[N47TE]

Hey guys, I actually logged a few hours on D-IDVK. Back when the airplane was USA based (hence my username), my dad and his friend flew her. My dad logged about 70 hours on her and his friend about 100. I flew her with my dad's friend back in 2007. Never in my life have I flown a King Air as smooth as D-IDVK. Beautiful paintjob, great avionics, and great handling qualities. My dad got teary-eyed as he read about the accident, and I can't even imagine how his friend felt. My dad was also good friends with two of the three guys that died in this crash (the two pilots). Very sad.

[hum]

Came across this thread as I was researching prior to a landing in EDFE at night in an aero commander. Must admit it turned out to be probably the most challenging approach I have ever done... Frankfurt ATC changed from the Westerly to the Easterly runway just as I had started my transition from IFR to VFR...

Anyone unfamiliar with the locality planning a night landing into EDFE please be aware that on the easterly runway a 90 deg turn onto 1 mile finals with 700ft high pylons as you start the turn makes for a very unpleasant approach:eek:

http://www.egelsbach-airport.com/_img/aip/dfs_09.jpg

[ABO944]

Took a Saab 340 in there a couple of years ago. Was an interesting arrival onto 27 but an even more interesting departure off 27 later on due to the pylons / EDDF Rwy 18 and climbing to around 1500ft if I remember correctly.

Made an "airshow" style departure !

You really have to study it well before operating in/out of there.

[flameouts]

I have made the approach path picture as simulated - see attached - my desktop picture and see it EVERY day because I am unable to understand
for what the Pilot and/or Pilots where looking - one at least should have been glued with his eyes to Altimeter... could not find anything at the BFU site yet - wait and see....



Sry this is the link - the upper left one !

<http://www.pictureupload.de/Egelsbach-gid36583.html>

[flameouts]

Hi again,

whoever might be interested in the a.m. crash some time ago should read this:

<http://mutsinzireport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Falcon-Report-english.pdf>

Outstanding report considering the political circunstances - long and heavy
but you will be an expert on this matter after the reading !

Only for Africa Expert´s.......
:uhoh:

[EatMyShorts!]

WTF has this crash of a Falcon 50 to do with the accident in Egelsbach, Germany?

[flameouts]

Nothing - may be a new/old thread would have been better !

Sorry !

[flameouts]

HELLO,

here are some more details:

<http://www.bfu-web.de/cln_007/nn_223968/DE/Publikationen/Bulletins/2009/Bulletin2009-12,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/Bulletin2009-12.pdf>

Don´t know what to say - CHECK YOU ALTIMETER - may be they had
the wrong QNH ?

Saludos

[EatMyShorts!]

Hi guys, the final report about this accident is out. Unfortunately it is written in German only. In condensed form it was concluded that:

the PIC and the other two persons on board did have alcohol in their blood. They must have consumed it within the last 30 minutes of flight, yes INFLIGHT!
the PIC had a noticeable amount of drugs in his blood, that are used against Parkinson's disease
the plane's airworthy certificate was out of date since quite a few weeks
probably due to spacial disorientation (alcohol+drugs) the pilot descended way too early and way too fast and entered a large patch of fog that was hanging around the tree tops just east of the airfield. Had the crew stayed on the normal descent path and then later on the PAPI, everything would have been fine

Quite a surprising outcome. And I guess there are more people flying around with alcohol and drugs in their head...

[Talkingtothedeaf]

Any insight into the pilots experience and qualifications?

[fernytickles]

Good grief. Why?

I guess we'll never know, unless there was an atmosphere of "its ok to have a drink whilst flying" accepted in that company. :ugh:

[EatMyShorts!]

Well, the PIC had a PPL with an IFR-rating. His total experience, at an age of 61, was more than 2000 hours, which is quite a lot for a private pilot. The passenger on the right seat had a PPL + IR, too. He was also qualified to fly that airplane, but probably did not speak up, because the PIC was more experienced. Essentially he was there as a passenger, doing the radio communications only.

[Denti]

And the pilots license wasn't renewed, just his typeratings were. So he basically flew without a current license.

However, 2000 hours is not all that much, even for a PPL depending on when he started to fly. It is not inexperienced either though, especially as both pilots were based in Egelsbach and therefore knew the field.

[EatMyShorts!]

Well, let's not forget that his licence had only expired because of this completely unnecessary and idiotic ZÜP (check of reliability, a background check, only done in Germany). So I would not say that his licence was not valid, it was just a formal thing.

[what next]

Hello!

So I would not say that his licence was not valid, it was just a formal thing.

I see it that way too. And as for his alcohol consumption, .2‰ is really not much, like a small beer or so. Maybe they had chocolates or sweets with an alcoholic filling on board? Two or three of those will probably give you that kind of blood alcohol content. Not that I want to defend alcohol consumption by pilots on duty in any way!

But what's really strange is the fact that they did not use the GPS receiver they carried on board. Even if it was their homebase, descending through clouds close to the ground on a "visual" approach without any distance readings is a bold way to do things. And more so, considering they weren't able to stay on the centerline, even after getting vectors from the controller? We will never know what they were thinking.

Happy landings
max

[Rory Dixon]

Unfortunately, one of the drugs the PIC took lowers the alcohol tolerance. Thus, the level found could be quite critical.
I think it is interesting that the PIC had a valid medical with his underlying disease and the combination of drugs he took.

[EatMyShorts!]

Hi Rory, but there lies the problem: how should an AME find out about this condition and about these drugs? This guy obviously did not mention his condition, nor the drugs he was taking. The standard tests that are done on our urine and blood do not look for these things. If you keep your mouth shut, you can continue like this until the illness has become so bad that you cannot hide it anymore.

[flameouts]

Amazing - what the BFU report says - in 400 ft. the ceiling was 5/8 to 7/8 - don´t know what they where up to - having other Airports with better Met Reports in their reach... two Pilots - three opinions ?

[Trim Stab]

idiotic ZÜP (check of reliability, a background check, only done in Germany).


Could you tell us more about this - what does the acronym mean? Zuverlassigkeit über personn something or other? And what does the check involve? Why was it introduced?

[His dudeness]

ZÜP means ZuverlässigkeitsÜberPrüfung

Involves background check via every 3 letter institution Germany has...like

KraftfahrtBundesAmt - Federal Agency for Kraftfahrt (where your points on the driving licence are)

BundesKriminalAmt - equivalent of the FBI

BundesNachrichtenDienst - equivalent of the CIA

Regular Police back ground check....

I may have forgotten one or two agencies.

The procedure is to ask the LKA for the ZÜP, they start the whole process and after 4-6 weeks you get a pdf with your ZÜP.

If you hold a german licence and you´re not German, then you don´t need the ZÜP (I was told...dunno wether that is really the case)

[what next]

If you hold a german licence and you´re not German, then you don´t need the ZÜP.

You do! (Quoting from luftrecht-info.de: "Bei Ausländern: Auskunft aus Ausländerzentralregister, sowie im Einzelfall an die zuständige Ausländerbehörde").

[His dudeness]

Your right, thats what the LBA says....


Background check for persons resident outside the Federal Republic of Germany:
Persons resident outside the Federal Republic of Germany contact the Niedersächsische
Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr, Sophienstraße 5, 38304 Wolfenbüttel
(www.strassenbau.niedersachsen.de).application for a background check has been filed