PDA

View Full Version : Kunpeng Airlines and Wasinc contract


Ipitch4U
29th May 2009, 05:00
I wanted to post some information about Kunpeng Airlines and Wasinc for those pilots of thinking of flying in China.

Let’s just say I have first hand experience with the dealings going on there. With a year left on the contract Kunpeng decided to stop flying the CRJ, actually Mesa airlines decided to repossess the aircraft. I was a CRJ pilot that had been skipped over for the EMB-190 that Kunpeng has been taken delivery of, I’m not complaining about that because I signed up for the CRJ and the EMB was not even on the drawing board when I got here. But now that the CRJ’s have been pulled out from underneath me as of March 5th, I have not received a pay check since. Of course the contract I worked under had a clause that if the aircraft that I flew stopped and my services were no longer needed I would be paid two months salary and any unused days of personal leave, also there is a travel allowance that we get paid and that also has been forgotten about. With all said and done I am owed over 20 thousand dollars, and out of a job.

Also with that said, Kunpeng/Shenzhen Airlines have started there own recruiting web sight to recruit the EMB pilots. I am bringing this up because if you look at Wasincs web sight you will see another Chinese airline (Grand China Express) that is looking for EMB-190 captains and paying in the nabourhood of 120 grand per year. The Kunpeng/Shenzhen web sight is offering only 88 grand per year for the same job.

Wasinc web sight:
http://www.wasinc.net/ (http://www.wasinc.net/)

Kunpeng/Shenzhen recruiting web sight:
http://www.chinaflightcrew.com/jsp/mainpage/index.jsp (http://www.chinaflightcrew.com/jsp/mainpage/index.jsp)

I am not posting to slam Wasinc, they have had a really tough time dealing with the Chinese, but my contract was with them, so some sort of blame does fall on there shoulders. Also, I do not want to bash every airline in China, hopefully others have had good luck with Shenzhen and I wish my experience was a good one because at the end of the day I would have really like to stay in China. Unfortunately, contracts in China are not worth the paper their printed on, if you come into knowing that you will not be let down later.

Please do your research before coming to China.

Good luck!
:ugh:

Avpilot
29th May 2009, 14:09
It's not just China. It's most of the world, I think. I'm currently in Kuwait and contracts are not honored here, either. It makes me sick to see business owners who easily spend $500,000 on a personal trip to NYC withhold contractual pay to employees acting in good faith. There are a lot of assholes in this world, my friend.

Tim

intelligentpilot
29th May 2009, 15:33
Hong Kong is the same. And I believe our comrades in Dubai are also getting the same treatment.

A Contract in Hong Kong is only good to wipe your ass with and nothing else. I am referring to Hong Kong Airlines and Hong Kong Express. Do not touch either of these companies with a 40 ft pole, unless you really want to be lied to, intimidated and your contract terms changed after you move your entire family here. Unemployment is a better option. :yuk:

Spread the Word. HKA and HKE are the worst ever. Worse than the Chinese carriers.:yuk: :ugh:

Ipitch4U
30th May 2009, 07:30
Yeah, I have fallowed the Hong Kong debacle from the cheap seats. I actually wanted to work there when I knew I was going to get hosed here at my present place. I used to hear a lot of the Brits on the radio over central China and always wanted to say hello:ok:. Maybe the Chinese will run all of us foreigners out some day!

I was also looking at a job in Dubai, so thanks for the heads up there.

I'm still hoping for something here in China, but have lowered my expectation greatly, I think its the only way to be able to work here.

AIEXPATS
30th May 2009, 12:54
Very sorry to hear of your plight. Perhaps looking at the Website of the CHINA INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND TRADE ARBITRATION COMMISSION. It is similar to a Small Claims Court - but in CN.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (http://www.cietac.org.cn/index_english.asp)

Put on your reading glasses and check it out!
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission
Financial Disputes Arbitration Rules
(Revised and Adopted by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce on March 17, 2005. Effective as from May 1, 2005.)
ChapterⅠGeneral Provisions
Article 1 These Rules are formulated for the purpose of impartial and prompt resolution of disputes arising from financial transactions between the parties.

Article 2 The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (also known as the Arbitration Court of the China Chamber of International Commerce and hereinafter referred to as the "CIETAC") independently and impartially resolves, by means of arbitration, disputes arising from, or in connection with, financial transactions between the parties.
The term "financial transactions" shall refer to transactions arising between financial institutions inter se, or arising between financial institutions and other natural or legal persons in the currency, capital, foreign exchange, gold and insurance markets that relate to financing in both domestic and foreign currencies, and the assignment and sale of financial instruments and documents denominated in both domestic and foreign currencies, including but not limited to:
1. Loans;
2. Deposit certificates;
3. Guarantees;
4. Letters of credit;
5. Negotiable instruments;
6. Fund transactions and fund trusts;
7. Bonds;
8. Collection and remittance of foreign currencies; :eek:
9. Factoring;
10. Reimbursement agreements between banks; and
11. Securities and futures.

Article 3 These Rules shall apply to any financial dispute accepted by the CIETAC for arbitration where the parties have agreed upon the application thereof. Failing such agreement, the Arbitration Rules of the CIETAC shall apply.
The CIETAC shall make a ruling on objections with regard to whether the dispute between the parties arises from, or is in connection with, a financial transaction, or whether these Rules should be applied to the dispute between the parties.

Article 4 Where the parties have agreed on any modification of these Rules, the parties?agreement shall prevail except where such agreement is inoperative or in conflict with a mandatory provision of the law of the place of arbitration.
Where the parties agree to refer their disputes to arbitration under these Rules without providing the name of an arbitration institution, they shall be deemed to have agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration by the CIETAC.

Article 5 The CIETAC shall have the power to determine the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and its jurisdiction over an arbitration case. The CIETAC may, if necessary, delegate such power to the arbitral tribunal. Where the validity of the arbitration agreement is challenged and one party requests the CIETAC to make a decision thereon while the other party applies to the People's Court for a ruling, such a ruling shall be made by the People's Court.
The arbitration shall proceed notwithstanding an objection to the arbitration agreement and/or jurisdiction over the arbitration case.

Article 6 The parties may appoint arbitrators from the Panel of Arbitrators in Financial Industry of the CIETAC, or from such Panel of Arbitrators as may be designated by the CIETAC. The appointment of the arbitrators by the parties shall be subject to the confirmation by the Chairman of the CIETAC. Such confirmation shall be made, or not made, without stating the reasons therefor.
Where the parties have agreed to appoint arbitrators from outside of the CIETAC’s Panels of Arbitrators, the arbitrators so appointed by the parties or nominated according to the agreement of the parties may act as arbitrator if the appointment is confirmed by the Chairman of the CIETAC in accordance with the law. Such confirmation shall be made, or not made, without stating the reasons therefor.
Where the appointment of an arbitrator is to be made by the Chairman of the CIETAC, the Chairman may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, appoint such arbitrator from the Panel of Arbitrators in Financial Industry or from other Panel of Arbitrators of the CIETAC.
For cases of securities and futures disputes, arbitrators shall be appointed from the Panel of Arbitrators in Securities and Futures Industry of the CIETAC.

Article 7 An arbitrator appointed by the parties or by the Chairman of the CIETAC shall sign a Declaration and disclose to the CIETAC in writing any facts or circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his/her impartiality or independence.
Chapter II Arbitral Proceedings
Article 8 The arbitration proceedings shall commence on the date on which the CIETAC or one of its Sub-Commissions receives a Request for Arbitration.

Article 9 A party applying for arbitration shall:
1. Submit a Request for Arbitration in writing signed by and/or affixed with the seal of the Claimant and/or its authorized representative(s), which shall, inter alia, include:
(a) the names, addresses and methods for communications of the Claimant and the Respondent, including the zip code, telephone, telex, fax and telegraph numbers, Email addresses or any other means of electronic telecommunications;
(b) a reference to the arbitration agreement that is invoked;
(c) a statement of the facts of the case and the main issues in dispute;
(d) the claim of the Claimant; and
(e) the facts and grounds on which the claim is based.
2. Attach to the Request for Arbitration the relevant evidence supporting the facts on which the Claimant’s claim is based.
3. Make payment of the arbitration fee in advance to the CIETAC according to its Financial Arbitration Fee Schedule.

Article 10 Where the Secretariat of the CIETAC finds that a Request for Arbitration satisfies the requirements for arbitration, it shall notify the parties in writing of its acceptance of the Request for Arbitration within five (5) days from the date of receipt of the Request. Should the Secretariat of the CIETAC find that the Request for Arbitration does not satisfy the requirements for arbitration, it shall notify the parties in writing of its rejection of the request for arbitration and the reasons therefor.

Article 11 Together with the Notice of Arbitration for the acceptance of the Request for Arbitration, the Secretariat of the CIETAC shall furnish to the Claimant these Rules, the Arbitration Rules of the CIETAC, the Panel of Arbitrators in Financial Industry and such other Panel of Arbitrators of the CIETAC as may be designated.
Together with the Notice of Arbitration for the acceptance of the Application for Arbitration, the Secretariat of the CIETAC shall furnish to the Respondent a copy of the Claimant's Request for Arbitration and the documents annexed thereto, these Rules, the Arbitration Rules of the CIETAC, the Panel of Financial Arbitrators and such other Panel of Arbitrators of the CIETAC as may be designated.

Article 12 The arbitral tribunal shall be composed of one or three arbitrators. Where the parties have not agreed upon the number of arbitrators, the Chairman of the CIETAC shall decide whether the arbitral tribunal shall be composed of one or three arbitrators.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where the arbitral tribunal is composed of one arbitrator, the Claimant and the Respondent shall, within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration by the party who last receives it, jointly appoint a sole arbitrator or entrust the Chairman of the CIETAC to effect such appointment.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where the arbitral tribunal is composed of three arbitrators, the Claimant and the Respondent shall, within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, respectively appoint an arbitrator or entrust the Chairman of the CIETAC to effect such appointment, and shall, within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration by the party who last receives it, jointly appoint a third arbitrator, or alternatively, shall entrust the Chairman of the CIETAC to effect such appointment. The third arbitrator shall be the presiding arbitrator.
Where there are two or more Claimants and/or Respondents in an arbitration case, the Claimant's side and/or the Respondent' side each shall, through consultation, jointly appoint an arbitrator, or alternatively, jointly entrust the Chairman of the CIETAC to effect such appointment.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator or fails to entrust the Chairman of the CIETAC to effect such appointment in due course, such arbitrator shall be appointed by the Chairman of the CIETAC.
Article 13 Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the Respondent shall, within fifteen (15) working days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, submit its written Statement of Defense and the relevant evidence to the Secretariat of the CIETAC.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the Respondent shall, within the foregoing time period, file its counterclaim in writing, if any, with the Secretariat of the CIETAC.

Article 14 Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the Claimant shall, within fifteen (15) working days from the date of receipt of the Statement of Counterclaim and the attachment of the Respondent, file its written Statement of Defense to the Respondent’s counterclaim with the Secretariat of the CIETAC.

Article 15 The arbitral tribunal may conduct the arbitration in such way as it deems appropriate. The arbitral tribunal shall treat the parties with equality and afford each party reasonable opportunities for presentations.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may adopt an inquisitorial or adversarial approach when examining the case, having regard to the circumstances of the case.

Article 16 During the arbitral proceedings, the arbitral tribunal may issue procedural directions and lists of questions, and hold pre-hearing meetings and preliminary hearings, etc.

Article 17 Where a time period for producing evidence has been agreed upon by the parties or has been set by the arbitral tribunal, the parties shall produce their evidence to the arbitral tribunal within the specified time period.
Where no such time period for producing evidence is agreed upon by the parties or set by the arbitral tribunal, the parties shall file all written statements and relevant evidence with the Secretariat of the CIETAC not less than three (3) working days prior to the date of the first oral hearing.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties or decided by the arbitral tribunal, the arbitral tribunal may refuse to admit any written statement or evidence submitted by any party beyond the time period for producing evidence.

Article 18 The arbitral tribunal shall hold an oral hearing when examining the case. However, the oral hearing may be omitted and the case shall be examined on the basis of documents only if the parties so request or agree and the arbitral tribunal also deems that the oral hearing is unnecessary. If the oral hearing is to be held, the Secretariat of the CIETAC shall serve a Notice of Oral Hearing on each party at least ten (10) working days in advance of the oral hearing date.

Article 19 With the consent of the Secretary-General of the CIETAC, the time period specified in Article 12 may be extended.
With the consent of the arbitral tribunal, the time periods respectively specified in Articles 13, 14 and 18 may be extended.

Article 20 Where the parties have agreed on the place of arbitration in writing, their agreement shall prevail. Failing such agreement, the place of arbitration shall be the domicile of the CIETAC or its Sub-Commission. The arbitral award shall be deemed as being made at the place of arbitration.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may conduct oral hearings or other activities at any place it deems appropriate.
Chapter III Award
Article 21 Subject to mandatory provisions of law, the parties to any case involving a foreign-related element may agree upon the law to be applied to the merits of the dispute. Failing such agreement, the arbitral tribunal shall apply the law that it determines to be appropriate. In all cases, the arbitral tribunal shall take into account the terms of the contract, the general usages and standard practices of specific business sectors, and abide by the principles of fairness and reasonableness.

Article 22 Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall render an arbitral award within forty-five (45) working days from the date on which the arbitral tribunal is formed.
At the request of the arbitral tribunal, the Chairman of the CIETAC may extend the said time period if he considers it truly necessary and the reasons for the extension truly justified. Each such extension may not exceed twenty (20) working days.


Article 23 Before signing an award, the arbitral tribunal shall submit it in draft form to the CIETAC. Without affecting the independence of the arbitrators in rendering the award, the CIETAC may draw the arbitrators' attention to matters pertaining to the award.
Chapter IV Miscellaneous
Article 24 All documents, notices and written materials in relation to the arbitration may be sent to the parties and/or their authorized representative(s) in person, or by registered mail or express mail, facsimile, telex, cable, Email or by any other means considered proper by the Secretariat of the CIETAC.
Article 25 Unless otherwise agreed by the parties or decided by the arbitral tribunal, for the purposes of these Rules, the term "working day" shall mean a working day at the domicile of the CIETAC.

Article 26 In the event of any inconsistency between these Rules and the Arbitration Rules of the CIETAC, these Rules shall prevail.

For matters not covered in these Rules, the Arbitration Rules of the CIETAC shall apply.

Article 27 These Rules uniformly apply to the CIETAC and its Sub-Commissions. Where arbitratal proceedings are administered by a Sub-Commission, the functions and duties under these Rules allocated to the Chairman, the Secretariat and the Secretary-General of the CIETAC shall be performed, respectively, by a Vice-Chairman authorized by the Chairman, a secretariat and a Secretary-General of the relevant Sub-Commission.

Article 28 These Rules shall be interpreted by the CIETAC.

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission
ARBITRATION FEE SCHEDULE
(This fee schedule applies to the arbitration cases accepted under Item 1 and 2 of Article 3 of the Arbitration Rules, and becomes effective on May 1, 2005)
Amount of Claim (RMB)
Amount of Fee (RMB)
1,000,000 Yuan or less 3.5% of the Claimed Amount, minimum 10,000 Yuan 1,000,000 Yuan to 5,000,000 Yuan 35,000 Yuan plus 2.5% of the amount above 1,000,000 Yuan 5,000,000 Yuan to 10,000,000 Yuan 135,000 Yuan plus 1.5% of the amount above 5,000,000 Yuan 10,000,000 Yuan to 50,000,000 Yuan 210,000 Yuan plus 1% of the amount above 10,000,000 Yuan 50,000,000 Yuan or more 610,000 Yuan plus 0.5% of the amount above 50,000,000 Yuan
Each case, when being accepted, shall be charged an additional amount of RMB 10,000 Yuan as a Registration Fee which includes the expenses for examining the application for arbitration, initiating the arbitration proceedings, computerizing management and filing the documents.

Where the amount of the claim is not ascertained at the time when application for arbitration is handed in, or there exists special circumstances, the amount of arbitration fee shall be determined by the secretariat of the CIETAC or its Sub-Commission.

If the arbitration fee is charged in foreign currency, an amount of foreign currency equivalent to the corresponding RMB value specified in this schedule shall be paid.

Apart from charging arbitration fee according to this Arbitration Fee Schedule, the CIETAC or its Sub-commission may collect other extra, reasonable and actual expenses pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Arbitration Rules.

Seil Knisaw
31st May 2009, 18:42
There is a lot of frustration with pilots on wasinc contracts in both China and Japan. A search for "wasinc" on here and flightinfo.com reveals a lot of anger, which should serve as a warning to those considering working for wasinc. They've lost all of their contracts in Japan and are now struggling with the politics in China. I personally have nothing bad to say about them. I interviewed there, but I fortunately was hired at NCA and was able to avoid making the decision to work for wasinc. By the way, HACS is GREAT! But, a good friend just lost his job with the jalways contract with wasinc and since he started initial training there he has expressed nothing but frustration.

I've been working on contracts in Asia for 12 yearsand if you want to work your way into the Asian market, I recommend HACS, Parc, CCL, or DPI.