Trojan1981
27th Apr 2009, 23:29
Army Black Hawks 'too vulnerable for Afghan war' - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/31/2530679.htm)
Army Black Hawks 'too vulnerable for Afghan war'
Posted Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:50am AEDT
Updated Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:15am AEDT
'Too vulnerable': A newspaper report says none of the army's 33 Black Hawk helicopters can be used in Afghanistan (Department of Defence: SGT John Carroll)
The Defence Department needs to explain why its Black Hawk helicopters cannot be deployed to Afghanistan, Australian Strategic Policy Institute analyst Andrew Davies says.
A report in today's Australian newspaper claims a lack of upgrades to military equipment like fighter jets and warships means they are too vulnerable to be used in war zones.
It says none of the army's 33 Black Hawk helicopters can be used in Afghanistan because they are susceptible to heat-seeking shoulder-launched missiles.
Mr Davies has told ABC 2 News Breakfast that other countries in the Afghanistan, such as the US, are using Black Hawks in the conflict.
"They have shielding on their exhaust to cut down the heat the missile homes in on," he said.
"We've been in Afghanistan for six years now and our Black Hawks still can't deploy there. So there's a question to be asked as to why that is.
"In terms of the equipment we have - the high-end equipment like the fighter jets and the war ships - if we were asked to deploy them into our conflict zone today we wouldn't be able to because they wouldn't have the systems required to operate safely."
The Federal Government is close to completing a Defence white paper, to be released later this year, which is set detail major reforms to the armed forces.
Mr Davies says Defence has lost the balance between being ready for future conflicts and maintaining current equipment to be ready for immediate deployment.
"We're now nine years since the last white paper, and the last white paper said we don't always know what sort of warning time we're going to get so we need to maintain a reasonable amount of readiness and I think when you look at the ADF today we're not really there," he said.
"I think we've not got the balance right betwween managing things so that they're ready to go when we need them."
Army Black Hawks 'too vulnerable for Afghan war'
Posted Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:50am AEDT
Updated Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:15am AEDT
'Too vulnerable': A newspaper report says none of the army's 33 Black Hawk helicopters can be used in Afghanistan (Department of Defence: SGT John Carroll)
The Defence Department needs to explain why its Black Hawk helicopters cannot be deployed to Afghanistan, Australian Strategic Policy Institute analyst Andrew Davies says.
A report in today's Australian newspaper claims a lack of upgrades to military equipment like fighter jets and warships means they are too vulnerable to be used in war zones.
It says none of the army's 33 Black Hawk helicopters can be used in Afghanistan because they are susceptible to heat-seeking shoulder-launched missiles.
Mr Davies has told ABC 2 News Breakfast that other countries in the Afghanistan, such as the US, are using Black Hawks in the conflict.
"They have shielding on their exhaust to cut down the heat the missile homes in on," he said.
"We've been in Afghanistan for six years now and our Black Hawks still can't deploy there. So there's a question to be asked as to why that is.
"In terms of the equipment we have - the high-end equipment like the fighter jets and the war ships - if we were asked to deploy them into our conflict zone today we wouldn't be able to because they wouldn't have the systems required to operate safely."
The Federal Government is close to completing a Defence white paper, to be released later this year, which is set detail major reforms to the armed forces.
Mr Davies says Defence has lost the balance between being ready for future conflicts and maintaining current equipment to be ready for immediate deployment.
"We're now nine years since the last white paper, and the last white paper said we don't always know what sort of warning time we're going to get so we need to maintain a reasonable amount of readiness and I think when you look at the ADF today we're not really there," he said.
"I think we've not got the balance right betwween managing things so that they're ready to go when we need them."