PDA

View Full Version : Private Hire: VDO vs Airswitch


J0N0
26th Apr 2009, 02:27
I dropped in to the local aeroclub the other day to enquire about private hire rates and was somewhat disapointed to see on the bottom of the page with all the details,

"NB. All charges are start-up to shutdown - clock or VDO not airswitch."

Its been a fair while since I private hired something but I remember the place that I learnt to fly would charge VDO when it was dual or airswitch/tacho time for private hire.

Now I know we are ALL professional about what we do (right???) but it seems to me it would encourage bad behavior like mag checks on taxi or not waiting till the oil temp was in the green before blasting off etc etc. Hopefully this wouldn't happen but the cynic in me says it must make it more likely?

Is this the generally excepted standard now adays? Anyone out there private hire using airswitch? Is the maintance still calculated on airswitch? That could be a factor I guess.

On a side note the C172 at this regional city goes out at $215.00 for non members. Its a fairly universal aircraft, wondering what others are charging round Oz if you know??

splinter11
26th Apr 2009, 10:52
I would agree that it is a load of bs that they charge on startup to shutdown. Your right, i think it probably does lead to people pushing the min time on the ground. I am finding this is the norm to charge the whole time which is dumb, since maintenance time is based on airswitch. Spose not much you can do at the end of the day, its just damn annoying

Mr.Buzzy
26th Apr 2009, 11:45
Also be aware that you could be charged from the moment you turn the battery on!
Have seen the VDO tick over just while a couple of waypoints were being put into the GPS.... No engine running!

bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

KittyKatKaper
26th Apr 2009, 11:48
Both methods (air time and engine-running time) have valid and reasonable reasons for being used.
From the flight-schools perspective, they are paying for fuel and (possibly) a captive on-board instructor while the engine is running.
From the owners perspective they pay for maintanence when the aircraft actually flies and the engine is producing significant power.

If the ground time is significant compared to the airtime (eg doing circuits at a place where the parking area is a long way away from the runway) then VDO time is fairer because someone has to pay for the fuel (and instructor if applicable)

But if the ground time is small in comparison to the airtime (eg a 4 hour cross-country) then either method will produce a similar total cost and there's not much $ to be saved by speeding-up runnups. After all, the enroute winds on a long trip will have more influence on the total trip time.

Silver Spur
26th Apr 2009, 12:56
Hi,

Few years back, I was charged from START UP to SHUT DOWN for a single engine constant speed prop. and at the same place, I was charged Airswitch for a Multi Engine. I called up the bloke at the same place few days ago for a planned private hire next week, and they still do the same.

Point is, if it is a single engine with not too much before take off hassles, and operating out of say, a typical GAAP, its is fair enough to charge form start to shut.

Regards,

SS

Unhinged
26th Apr 2009, 22:22
In practice, it makes almost no difference to what you're going to pay after the flight. If you're getting charged airswitch time, you can be certain the rate will be higher than for engine time charges.

If I guess J0N0's local aeroclub correctly, the last time I flew there, their engine switches were all linked to oil pressure, and so only count the time when the engine is running. Never seen one like Buzzy's that started ticking when the master switch was turned on, but I can imagine that some dodgy operator might try such a trick.

BPH63
26th Apr 2009, 22:38
what time do you log?

Altimeters
26th Apr 2009, 23:49
I was always told to log VDO, or if it was run off airswitch then note down your start up and shut down times.

Charlie Foxtrot India
27th Apr 2009, 04:54
Over the years we've found that for each 100 maintenance hours (tacho or airswitch) you get around 110 VDO hours. Costings done accordingly, so if you want to hire on airswitch then be prepared to pay about 10% more than VDO.
There are some VDOs that run on master switch, in which case the VDO time at start up is noted, sometimes the stude may have been sitting there listening to the ATIS for 10 minutes :sad: while you do your secret instructors business prior to the flight...obviously they shouldn't pay for that.

Ted D Bear
28th Apr 2009, 10:35
Once hired a 55 Baron where the airswitch was actually attached to the gear squat switch, which meant you only paid when the gear was up - very tempting to do lots of practice ILSes in that one! Even a normal airswitch is a much better (and fairer) proposition in high performance aircraft, especially if you are flying relatively short legs (where the taxi time is a bigger proportion of the total time). Plus - no incentive to rush to pre-take off checks and much less likely to get agro with ATC when they tell you to expect a 10 minute delay while on the ground at BK while SY DEP identifies and separates the VFR C152 that just departed into Class C in front of you!

Clearedtoreenter
28th Apr 2009, 13:09
Mostly flying schools charge by VDO, if one is fitted. What works out cheapest all depends on what you're doing. On a Xcountry with the power well up in something like an Archer, tacho can actually work out more than VDO. After a session of circuits or stalls, tacho is usually up to 30% less than VDO, which usually starts counting as a result of oil pressure and so counts from start-up. Worse, some start counting as soon as the master switch goes on.... Airswitches I've come accoss, either work on the airspeed indicator, which starts counting beyond a certain speed, maybe 40 Kts, or have a small vane mounted outside somewhere that blows a microswitch shut when the airflow is enough. So, any self respecting owner/flying school would be nuts to charge by airswitch - but would almost certainly use that for the maintenance time. Another variation is the one that starts counting when the gear goes up. I once knew a guy who had one of those. Was OK until he took it for a 100hrly where they jacked it and rasied the gear - then left it up over a weekend. :ugh:

Charge by VDO, maintenance by airswitch - that's how they make money!

$215 VDO is less than some. 172's I know of vary from $160 - $245 VDO inc GST.

rachbuzz
4th Jan 2011, 10:31
I would like to know more about how aircraft hours are ascertained. Particularly variances in ttis hours and vdo hours. I dont understand or know a lot of the jargon but after reading the threads its seems I may learn something here. Any knowledge shared would be appreciated.

VH-XXX
4th Jan 2011, 10:45
There are a few main types of hour recording that you need to know about as the aircraft hirer (there may be other types or the method used to record them may vary depending on aircraft configuration).

1. VDO / Taco / RAW engine hours

Depends on aircraft configuration, however for some aircraft, starts to tick over when engine RPM exceeds threshold, for example, 1,500 rpm. As you can imagine, it will only tick over hours during runups, followed by takeoff and flight. Alternatively, some configurations start the hours ticking as soon as the engine is running. Engines with FADEC for example, start ticking over hours at 1,500rpm+.

2. Airswitch

Ticks over hours once the aircraft reaches a certain airspeed.


If you can hire an aircraft on airswitch time for a similar rate to VDO then you'll be laughing financially.

During circuits at an airport such as Bankstown or Moorabbin where it's often busy, the difference can be significant, at a rate of around 1.4.

1.0 hours airswitch.
1.4 hours taco / vdo.

Some owners feel that if the hirer is paying for the aircraft based on airswitch, then they are more likely to treat the aircraft well, for example, warm it up, don't over-rev it etc.

It is fair enough however, to be paying for VDO when an instructor in on board, otherwise expect the hourly rate to be higher for airswitch.


TTIS in the case of an advert for a used aircraft would normally be based on airswitch.

Unfortunately there is often debate in engineering / LAME circles where some feel that maintenance should not be performed on airswitch times, but rather VDO, as after all, the engine is still running for those hours. Compare to a car, oil change at 10,000 hours, but if a lot of those KMS are done in stop start or barely moving traffic, do you do the oil change at 14,000 kms instead?

CHAIRMAN
4th Jan 2011, 12:15
In simple aircraft like fixed gear singles, the owner will do maintenance on tacho time - most tachs in these are set to match watch at 2300rpm, and because the owner is doing his /her maintenance on this system, then thats what the a/c hire in/out rate should be based on (fuel burn is also directly proportional to RPM).
Most of these simple a/c on crosshire are also fitted with a VDO running off either oil press or master, for the purposes of easily recording the time an instructor is sitting in the RHS. In either event, during circs VDO will be about 10-20% ahead of tach, and on a crosscountry at 75% power VDO and tach will be the same.
For reasons stated before, training/endorsements at reputable outfits will be on VDO, and PVT hire on tach.
The charge in method is negotiated with the owner (at least with X/hired a/c) at the time of putting the machine on line.
More complicated aircraft are another story - generally the way the owner does maintenance should be the way the a/c is hired in/out - instructor time always being master on to master off.

Peter Fanelli
4th Jan 2011, 13:12
instructor time always being master on to master off.


What garbage. maybe when the instructor is replaced by a robot.
What about preflight briefing?
What about post flight debriefing?
How about a new student being shown how to perform a preflight inspection?
Should the instructor pop out to the flight line and turn the master on before beginning any of those?
It never seemed to be an issue in the past, pretty much everywhere I flew you had a dual rate and a hire and fly rate for the aircraft. All on tach time. The reason for the Hobbs in twins is that most of them don't have hour counters in the tachometers.

VH-XXX
4th Jan 2011, 19:58
A guy at my work went with a mate years ago for a jolly in a twin from Essendon. All he remembered from the flight was taxiing out whilst nursing the dash in his lap with a disconnected hour meter.

Tinstaafl
4th Jan 2011, 22:00
Related thread here: http://www.pprune.org/professional-pilot-training-includes-ground-studies/215758-what-airswitch-vdo.html

Arnold E
5th Jan 2011, 06:33
Never seen one like Buzzy's that started ticking when the master switch was turned on, but I can imagine that some dodgy operator might try such a trick.
My local operator does just that.:eek:

1a sound asleep
5th Jan 2011, 08:01
I went to the same aero club, which is based at an International Airport. I can just imagine a long taxi, holding for a few jets before being cleared for take off. Could easily imagine a 20 minute charge sitting idling. I have not been back

Icarus2001
5th Jan 2011, 08:37
Just to stir muddy water. VDO is a brand of instrument. (http://www.ultralightnews.ca/vdo_uslk/vdo_hourmeters.htm) Hobbs is also a brand of instrument. (http://content.honeywell.com/sensing/hss/hobbscorp/cat1.asp)

Either brand of gauge can be wired to run when:

1. The battery master is turned on.
2. The oil pressure rises.
3. The gear is retracted.
4. Weight on wheels (squat) switch.
5. Airswitch.

The point is made above that the rate you pay will reflect the method used.

Saying something is charged as "VDO" does not define the method used to switch the meter on.

YPJT
5th Jan 2011, 12:24
I've seen one or two aircraft that had the meter start ticking over when the master switch was turned on, most though are on engine start. From my experience, whether you get charged on airswitch (higher hourly rate) or the engine start-stop time, the end result will usually be pretty much the same. Operators have figured out the pros and cons over the years to work out what is fair and competitive.

MikeTangoEcho
5th Jan 2011, 21:00
Yeah it's crap you have to pay for time that you're not in the air, but don't forget you're logging these hours anyway (VDO). I think the definition in the logbook is something like, "From the time the aircraft moves under it's own power till the time it ceases to do so, chock to chock, block to block etc etc'.

But..

Even though you've started up and taken 6 minutes to start to taxi, you log .1 dont ya? At least that way you pay for the time you log, simple.

VH-XXX
5th Jan 2011, 21:24
The only time you'd ever want to use VDO time would be if you were hour building.

Those that have a licence and don't "need" the hours would always go for airswitch I available. For a qualified non-hour-builder on private hire, both parties would benefit from airswitch.

I have noticed moreso in twins, the tendency to charge for airswitch versus singles.

What does the Dr do?

Lasiorhinus
6th Jan 2011, 02:55
Who says there is any correlation between
a) the hours the aircraft flies,
b) the hours the operator charges you for, and
c) the hours you log?

Flight time, is take-off to landing, and goes on the MR.
"VDO" / "Hobbs" etc time is what you pay for,
Moving under your own power is what goes in your logbook.

VH-XXX
6th Jan 2011, 03:45
Depends what you are writing in the MR....

What to individual people write in the MR, Airswitch or Taco?

Lasiorhinus
6th Jan 2011, 05:42
MR time must be the time the aircraft spends in the air. Tacho time is unlikely to be correct, and if it is, its coincidental. Airswitch time can be fine - as long as it records correctly.
The best one to record on the MR is the actual time elapsed between takeoff and landing. Just make a note of the time at takeoff and at landing.

VH-XXX
6th Jan 2011, 06:51
Are you serious?

You've have obviously never owned an aircraft. So you expect a hirer to record with his watch how long he spends in the air and he then records that in the MR? What if he's missing half an hour or whatever? I don't think so and I cant see that even being legal, otherwise people would just write less hours in to save on maintenance costs and you would end up with a large discrepancy between tacho and airswitch.

bentleg
6th Jan 2011, 09:21
The aircraft I fly has no airswitch so tacho goes on the MR. We pay VDO.

CHAIRMAN
6th Jan 2011, 10:04
And what's the difference between the two BENTLEG?

mcgrath50
6th Jan 2011, 13:32
My understanding (and please correct if I am wrong) is either of the 3 times can be used of maintenance depending on what is approved for the aircrafts system of maintenance?

Eg; My Piper's MR is on VDO, my Cessna is on FS and my Beech is on Tacho. All would take into account the differences this time recording creates.

titenup
8th Jan 2011, 11:58
Flight time for the airframe (maintenance requirement) is wheels off to wheels on (CAR 1988). The reg also states (may not still be current), that U/C limit switches are acceptable to control timer. Any other system which will increase the recorded total will of course increase the maintenance per hour flown over the life of the aircraft.

As for tacho versus oil Px switch, the recording tacho generally only used on singles, will only record accurately at specified RPM, generally 2300, so there will be a discrepancy between tacho and oil Px for an engine that does longer ground based and low power setting operation.

Oh, of course, there is no reg that denies the option to do more frequent maintenance, or to record "short" hours, as recorded by any of the approved recording systems. You just cant do less maintenance than that based on recorded flight time - which is what goes on the MR.

notaplanegeek
9th Jan 2011, 03:39
I don't really like this, first taste of it was at Redcliffe Aero Club. There was a difference of .4 between the tacho and the hobs on a flight just over an hour. When you are flying a C310 at nearly $700 per hr it really starts to hit the pocket. Since then I have never gone back.

hogey74
24th Sep 2014, 11:14
Just did a private hire at YBAF. Tacho was 1.5, A/S was 1.2. I'm charged A/S. I ramped out at 15:56, ramped in at 1726. Did normal start, taxi to far end and run-up. Then some PSALs etc in the Eastern Training area. Normal cruise there and back, not above 2500. Did 6 circuits before calling it a day. One hour of circuits is normally 1.0 Tacho and 0.7 A/S.

Old Fella
25th Sep 2014, 04:22
During my civil aviation employment, as distinct from military aviation, I was credited for the elapsed time from 1 hour prior to push back to 10 minutes after on blocks. The aircraft flight log, as recorded by the FE, showed elapsed time from start of push-back to on blocks. The pax paid for whatever class or discounted ticket they held.

The point is it all depends on the provider of the aircraft how much the hirer pays. The Aero Club to which I belong has used VDO meter readings as the basis for hire charges whether is was private hire or dual under instruction or Bi-ennial review. Joyflights were fixed at a minimum charge. Charters vary with type. The Member v's Non-Member rates are different. Maintenance is/was done on either AirSwitch (vane actuated) or Tacho time depending on the aircraft.

Lasiorhinus
25th Sep 2014, 07:54
Are you saying you logged as flight time an entire hour before you actually started flying?

Old Fella
25th Sep 2014, 11:59
No mate. Salary based on xx hours per month. Any Extra hours attracted overtime payment. Hours logged were block to block.

ACMS
25th Sep 2014, 12:53
What's changed?
30 years ago all singles were charged on VDO activated by Oil pressure ( as mentioned above ) some bigger singles and Twins were on Tacho and others even bigger were Air Switch.

Why the sudden grief? Nothing's changed has it?