carty23
29th Dec 2008, 20:33
Hey guys, the following might be a bore for you but I have a future ambition of becoming a pilot, one I have held for a very long time, and I would like some advice off you. I am currently 15 and in my final year at high school, and the following are the grades I achieved for my GCSE mock exams Last month:
GCSE English Language: Done actual GCSE Test (early entry) and awaiting results in January
GCSE Maths: C :ugh:
# OCR Nationals level 2 in science: AAAA
GCSE History: A
GCSE Geography: A
GCSE Product Design: A
GCSE Religious Studies: A*
So, as you can see, my Maths result is the only odd one out, which is very unfortunate because I heard that ATPL ground theory is very numerate, and I’m not a very “numerate person” and sometimes have to go over things a couple of times to get the hack of things other people may find simple. My maths teacher put on my report that I am predicted a grade B at GCSE, and I should achieve it if I attend revision sessions and revise. Do you think my maths would cause a problem for me on the theory?
# As for my Science goes, I did the qualification mentioned above, an OCR nationals level 2 in science (which covers Biology, Chemistry and Physics) but is more of a vocational course than the separate science’s or dual award, but either way it equates to 4 GCSE’s A*-C. As you can see, I excelled well and finished the course in one year, but in all honesty, it wasn’t hard. Because of this, my science teacher wondered what we could do for the final year, and she decided that she would teach us an AS level in Applied Science. We have completed two units already and they have been sent off for moderation (get results in January). Both of the two units were out of 50 and I scored 44 in one and 42 in the other. Now all that is left to complete the course is to do an exam, biology based, entitled “monitoring the activity of the human body.” There is no physics content in this course; however, we did touch slightly on energy. Therefore, I do not considered myself to be a good physics person; do you think this will cause a problem for me on the theory?
I really do want to become a pilot, and although the assessment centre FTO’s offer would give me a better understanding whether I am capable of becoming one, do you think my qualifications are “good enough” to tackle the theory? :confused:
I am going on to sixth form next year (September), and I have chosen Geography, History, Sociology and Applied Science for my A levels, (the college agreed that if a certain number or more chose Applied Science from my class who are doing the AS, we would be able to go straight into the A2 year at our first year at college), and although none of these would help me as a pilot, I would rather get A’s and B’s in subjects I know I’m capable of achieving in than rather go for subjects that I know I will struggle with and probably end up coming out with D’s and E’s at A level.
Am I just unnecessary worrying or is there a cause for concern? All replies would be very appreciated, thank you in advance, Chris. :ok:
Sorry about the font, I copied and pasted it from a document and typed up on word before.
GCSE English Language: Done actual GCSE Test (early entry) and awaiting results in January
GCSE Maths: C :ugh:
# OCR Nationals level 2 in science: AAAA
GCSE History: A
GCSE Geography: A
GCSE Product Design: A
GCSE Religious Studies: A*
So, as you can see, my Maths result is the only odd one out, which is very unfortunate because I heard that ATPL ground theory is very numerate, and I’m not a very “numerate person” and sometimes have to go over things a couple of times to get the hack of things other people may find simple. My maths teacher put on my report that I am predicted a grade B at GCSE, and I should achieve it if I attend revision sessions and revise. Do you think my maths would cause a problem for me on the theory?
# As for my Science goes, I did the qualification mentioned above, an OCR nationals level 2 in science (which covers Biology, Chemistry and Physics) but is more of a vocational course than the separate science’s or dual award, but either way it equates to 4 GCSE’s A*-C. As you can see, I excelled well and finished the course in one year, but in all honesty, it wasn’t hard. Because of this, my science teacher wondered what we could do for the final year, and she decided that she would teach us an AS level in Applied Science. We have completed two units already and they have been sent off for moderation (get results in January). Both of the two units were out of 50 and I scored 44 in one and 42 in the other. Now all that is left to complete the course is to do an exam, biology based, entitled “monitoring the activity of the human body.” There is no physics content in this course; however, we did touch slightly on energy. Therefore, I do not considered myself to be a good physics person; do you think this will cause a problem for me on the theory?
I really do want to become a pilot, and although the assessment centre FTO’s offer would give me a better understanding whether I am capable of becoming one, do you think my qualifications are “good enough” to tackle the theory? :confused:
I am going on to sixth form next year (September), and I have chosen Geography, History, Sociology and Applied Science for my A levels, (the college agreed that if a certain number or more chose Applied Science from my class who are doing the AS, we would be able to go straight into the A2 year at our first year at college), and although none of these would help me as a pilot, I would rather get A’s and B’s in subjects I know I’m capable of achieving in than rather go for subjects that I know I will struggle with and probably end up coming out with D’s and E’s at A level.
Am I just unnecessary worrying or is there a cause for concern? All replies would be very appreciated, thank you in advance, Chris. :ok:
Sorry about the font, I copied and pasted it from a document and typed up on word before.