Sea Harriers

[sunshine band]

Hi everyone, I just thought I'd take some time out to sort through my collection of aircraft photos and found these in a folder on my computer. They were taken mostly on HMS Illustrious, except for the head on shot from a French C-135FR.

Enjoy...

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/001lowfine1filtered3.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/000hov4red.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/28febzh796red.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/005lst6.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/001tyre1a.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/190_9030.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh796aaa1red.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh797lst6.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh804lst64.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh804lst1234.jpg



SB

[sunshine band]

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh813lst12.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/sharlasttaxi1.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/sharlastdep.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh797lst100605.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/000lst675.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh804hov200206.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/zh796lnd280206.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/002hov060605.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/000radar100605.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/006afterlanding080605.jpg

http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo116/sband/sharheadon.jpg

[fallmonk]

Brilliant pics mate :D

[FoxtrotAlpha18]

Lovely! :ok:

[BEagle]

Excellent photos - and a sad reminder of a capability prematurely thrown away by this so-called government...:mad:


A box of Kleenex for WEBF please......

[RETDPI]

One point has always intrigued me.
Why did the Sea Harrier have a Starboard Facing Oblique F-95 camera ? (rather than the more normal Port Facing Oblique -as in the first generation RAF Harriers ).

[Double Zero]

At last a question I can answer !

Imagine, as I'm sure you have done, ' panning' a stills camera to get a moving target, ie at an airshow aircraft doing a low pass in focus, background blurred to show the speed or at least keep the aircraft sharp.

With modern digital civilian kit you could freeze both from a bystanders's point of view but it certainly wouldn't show the aircraft speed / height / position for useful tactical purposes.

The Vinten F-95 recce' camera had a system of moving the film across the film plane DURING the exposure, just as if one was ' panning ' a stills camera at at a moving object.

It also had a mild vacuum system to keep the film onto the film plane, though this was deleted on export versions ( F-100 ) and I suspect rarely bothered with on operations.

I spent a lot of time with this camera, but still found it very difficult to engage the ' inching on ' knob with the film side perforations by feel ( all one had to go on ) - I confessed to one cocked up test flight because of that, and people fell over like the palm trees launching Thunderbird 2 because I admitted it !

The reason the F-95 was on the different side from Sea Harrier compared to GR3 etc was simply to fit kit in, but keep the 'panning' system the same- camera mounted upside down in the Sea Harrier for that reason.

It was obviously a mild sod to work on, but nothing compared to the average fitter's job, especially on something like the Hunter.

I work at a museum now where there's a Swift, as you know delegated to low level recce' with 3 x F-95's - I'd love to see how the poor sods worked on these ! Ours ( Tangmere ) is an earlier example.

We also had to test a Vinten recce' pod for another export country which stands out particularly among others - while other systems ran fine, the F-100 nose camera and actual mechanical design of the pod left a lot to be desired .

When asked to write a report on the thing, I was taken aside, though not bolllocked, it was commented " we wished you hadn't used words like ' need to be improved' or ' defect' as they're a bit of a bother !

J.F, I know you are busy at the moment ( & Ta ) but I'm sure you'll know what I mean.

The F-95 used low quality optics and systems, above all the reliance on a berk like me for ( or in action a front liner ) for the settings,having to best-guess the speed & height of a recce' pass from a briefing he may or probably not was privy- to - how many of you pilots fancy being restritced by that ?!!!

DZ ( That monniker was a mistake, I meant Dastardly & Muttley's car, not 00 bloody 7 - will have to find how to get a motif onto my callsign ).

[pontifex]

As remember, in the Valiant, the panning or image movement (IMC) was fed in by the Green Satin. It didn't have to be preset.

[Engines]

Absolutely outstanding pictures - thank you