not_the_AOA
4th Nov 2008, 07:47
Interesting spin from the AOA in their latest missive...
Prompted by the “49ers Hit List” which recently leaked into the public domain, we asked you:
If you have or were to receive a Sickness letter, known as an “Absence Management Programme” letter, how would it affect you?
· It would have no effect as I think Management are genuinely concerned for my welfare
· It would have no effect but I don’t think Management care for my welfare
· I think it is intimidation and it would have no effect on making me operate if I was unfit to fly
· I think it is intimidation and it would have an effect on making me operate if I was unfit to fly
We did have two voters who thought that Management are genuinely concerned about their welfare. The vast majority, however, (well over 90%) regard such letters as intimidation. Worryingly, a significant minority (over 42%) recognise that it is intimidation, but ARE intimidated by Cathay Pacific into letting it have an effect on their decision whether they are unfit.
This sends out an alarming signal, with potential ramifications for Flight Safety. Are Cathay Pacific managers so unaware of the effects of their industrial decisions on the Flight Safety of the airline? And would the travelling public vote with their feet if they knew pilots are being intimidated into flying when they are unfit?
Let's scare away all the passengers, shall we?
Prompted by the “49ers Hit List” which recently leaked into the public domain, we asked you:
If you have or were to receive a Sickness letter, known as an “Absence Management Programme” letter, how would it affect you?
· It would have no effect as I think Management are genuinely concerned for my welfare
· It would have no effect but I don’t think Management care for my welfare
· I think it is intimidation and it would have no effect on making me operate if I was unfit to fly
· I think it is intimidation and it would have an effect on making me operate if I was unfit to fly
We did have two voters who thought that Management are genuinely concerned about their welfare. The vast majority, however, (well over 90%) regard such letters as intimidation. Worryingly, a significant minority (over 42%) recognise that it is intimidation, but ARE intimidated by Cathay Pacific into letting it have an effect on their decision whether they are unfit.
This sends out an alarming signal, with potential ramifications for Flight Safety. Are Cathay Pacific managers so unaware of the effects of their industrial decisions on the Flight Safety of the airline? And would the travelling public vote with their feet if they knew pilots are being intimidated into flying when they are unfit?
Let's scare away all the passengers, shall we?
