civil aviation
8th Jun 2008, 21:22
Thatcherites (remember them- free competition etc.) have admitted, off the record, that the 'privatisation' of the BAA monopoly was a huge mistake.
In BAA-free parts of the country, there is some choice and competition but, in the South East and Scotland, the airlines and their customers are ripped-off and suffer a terminal experience. Ludicrous check-in time excused by 'security' is the latest excuse for corralling customers in rip-off retail areas. It gets worse because any 'competitor' (non-BAA) airport operator doesn't have to be either cheap or good to be better than the legendary BAA 'terminal experience'. Hence the recent rush by the get-rich-quick brigade to buy Council-owned airports.
New Labour was never going to renationalise BAA so why, in over 10 years, haven't they broken-up BAA into separate individual airport companies?
BTW, it would be in the public interest for it to be unlawful to own more than one one airport within a reasonable distance of, for example, 100 miles.
In BAA-free parts of the country, there is some choice and competition but, in the South East and Scotland, the airlines and their customers are ripped-off and suffer a terminal experience. Ludicrous check-in time excused by 'security' is the latest excuse for corralling customers in rip-off retail areas. It gets worse because any 'competitor' (non-BAA) airport operator doesn't have to be either cheap or good to be better than the legendary BAA 'terminal experience'. Hence the recent rush by the get-rich-quick brigade to buy Council-owned airports.
New Labour was never going to renationalise BAA so why, in over 10 years, haven't they broken-up BAA into separate individual airport companies?
BTW, it would be in the public interest for it to be unlawful to own more than one one airport within a reasonable distance of, for example, 100 miles.