PDA

View Full Version : New York Times Reads pprune! (almost)


NickLappos
5th Apr 2007, 19:57
This diagram shows the life of most controversial pprune threads, doesn't it?

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/04/04/opinion/05opart-large.jpg

Fun Police
5th Apr 2007, 20:32
i couldn't agree more :} !

407 too
5th Apr 2007, 20:32
i'll use points 1 and 2

1) brilliant :D
2) it sure does show the life cycle of a blog
:hmm:

Whirlygig
5th Apr 2007, 20:36
3) I'd mostly agree but it omits the point where someone :E jumps in with a completely flippant and probably saucy, comment :ok:

Cheers

Whirls

407 too
5th Apr 2007, 20:38
what the H-- lets get right to #9

Nick, i've respected what you have posted in the past, but this is just short of being utter cr** !!

did something bend in your brain when you switched to stiff wings ??

I would have expected better regaurding your stature :ugh: :ugh:

:O :O

SASless
5th Apr 2007, 20:49
Usually helicopter pilots can be counted upon to shortcut the circuit or reduce any somewhat serious conversation to T and A within three responses or less.:E

407 too
5th Apr 2007, 20:56
THAT would be #13 SAS

just playing the devils advocate, but it seems you have done the same :cool:

Graviman
5th Apr 2007, 21:07
That's funny!

As promised here is the ISO9001 proceedure for development fault identification:
http://mybroadband.co.za/photos/data/500/medium/problem-solving-flowchart.png

So step 5 has begun then? :}

Mart

TeeS
5th Apr 2007, 21:58
Come on Guys (and Girls), this is a well thought out flow-diagram, can we try and keep the thread on track please!

Personally, I think it is pretty much spot on. My only problem is that it is too 'black and white', not everyone (or their thoughts) can be pigeon-holed in this way!

TeeS

Whirlygig
5th Apr 2007, 22:16
The diagram also omits the post criticizing another's spelling and grammar closely followed by other posts saying it doesn't matter!

Cheers

Whirls

Lord Mount
5th Apr 2007, 22:26
I think that another omission has been made.
I think somewhere between #4 and #8 someone would interject that there has already been a thesis on the same subject, berate the poster for not viewing the FAQs then helpfully leave a link to the previously mentioned thesis.

Lord M