OpsNormal
18th Jan 2006, 10:45
I've noticed that you have closed the aircraft polishing thread. You stated that was nothing more to discuss, while you'd be aware that many of us don't always get a chance every day to read the BB.
Why is there nothing more to discuss or have you (whichever one of you) never hand polished an aeroplane without the use of a mechanical buffer, instead of the the time honoured methods of using a cloth and elbow grease?
The reason there is more to discuss is that many GA operators who take a lot of pride in their fleet and who wouldn't let a mechanical buffer anywhere near their aircraft (for fear of actually damaging or stretching the sheet metal work due to the heat of a rotary buffing pad against the paint) are now in the position of deciding to either let their paint fade away in the desert sun or alternatively paying a "professional" to damage the aircraft a great deal more than a plain old polishing cloth and elbow grease would have?
What are your thoughts Woomera on the fact that a properly polished surface will resist the insidious effects of moisture able to penetrate the surface and certainly end-up placing the airframe at risk of an earlier retirement date than it would have if properly looked after appearance wise?
Has the regulator implemented the rule without a clear and concise wording that doesn't discriminate against those wishing to maintain a higher standard WRT appearances than "some" closer to the nucleus of the Regulator?
Nothing personal W, but by closing a thread like that what are you saying to the industry?
Why is there nothing more to discuss or have you (whichever one of you) never hand polished an aeroplane without the use of a mechanical buffer, instead of the the time honoured methods of using a cloth and elbow grease?
The reason there is more to discuss is that many GA operators who take a lot of pride in their fleet and who wouldn't let a mechanical buffer anywhere near their aircraft (for fear of actually damaging or stretching the sheet metal work due to the heat of a rotary buffing pad against the paint) are now in the position of deciding to either let their paint fade away in the desert sun or alternatively paying a "professional" to damage the aircraft a great deal more than a plain old polishing cloth and elbow grease would have?
What are your thoughts Woomera on the fact that a properly polished surface will resist the insidious effects of moisture able to penetrate the surface and certainly end-up placing the airframe at risk of an earlier retirement date than it would have if properly looked after appearance wise?
Has the regulator implemented the rule without a clear and concise wording that doesn't discriminate against those wishing to maintain a higher standard WRT appearances than "some" closer to the nucleus of the Regulator?
Nothing personal W, but by closing a thread like that what are you saying to the industry?