PDA

View Full Version : Mailwasher for spam screening


Ejector
5th Jan 2006, 23:49
I have been using the email spam screener Mailwasher for a long time, the NZ based program. I like how it bounces back emails to so you “don’t” exist.; Anyway, just reformatted and upgraded and it’s now pay ware. If I have to I am willing to buy the new version, but does any folks know of a good free simular program out there?

:) Thanks

Avtrician
6th Jan 2006, 00:01
Hvae used Mailwasher in the past, but didnt bouce mails, cos then you are only helping to clog the net with junk, and run up your download score. just delete and blackban is much better:ok:

swordfling
6th Jan 2006, 02:12
There is still a free version available at http://www.mailwasher.net which may still be useful depending on your requirements/setup.

Mac the Knife
6th Jan 2006, 21:03
"...I like how it bounces back emails to so you “don’t” exist..."

IMHO bouncing emails is a total waste of time (since they are sent out by automated bots that just toss 'em in the bin if they have a real return address (most of them don't)) and and just adds to the garbage clogging the internet bandwidth for the rest of us.

Mac the Knife
7th Jan 2006, 06:22
One of the best and less used features of Mailwasher are the Filters.

These are a bit difficult to set up for yourself unless you are familiar with regular expression writing, but happily it has been done for you.

See: http://www.w5hq.com/MailWasher/MailWasherFilters.txt

You can tweak these to your heart's content

IO540
7th Jan 2006, 07:42
"IMHO bouncing emails is a total waste of time "

True and not true.

True as far as spammers go; they just get themselves a willing SMTP server and stuff a million emails into it. Nothing that comes back to the From: address goes anywhere - unless of course they use a potentially real forged address like [email protected].

False as far as false detection goes. If your filters are a bit too aggressive (and getting them 100% right is NOT possible) then you will be dumping some emails from real people who want to contact you. It therefore helps to notify them that their email got dumped. Also, a lot of IPs, including those of big ISPs, get blacklisted by Spamcop etc, sometimes for only a day, sometimes for much longer. I can think of one big UK "business ISP" whose SMTP server is blacklisted by AT&T....

The mailwasher based antispam approach is hit and miss. I used MW for about 2 years. We used to get 1000+ spams a day, which it would identify with ~ 99% accuracy. So, every day, 10 real customer emails got lost. Completely useless!

In the end we just used it as a convenient way of deleting loads of emails. We ended up reading the subject of every one of those 1000, and would add any real ones to a "friends" list. But any new one would still get lost, probably.

Obviously one can do things in a business like adding the part number, name, etc of every product you make, or the name of everything that interests you e.g. cessna piper lycoming continental propeller etc etc to a subject-whitelist. Partially successful.

The only real way to attack spam is to use a system like TMDA which requests every previously unseen sender to reply to an email. The reply is used to authenticate them and add them to a whitelist, after which they don't get the request again.

Except for senders too thick to read and understand an email saying "please reply to this message", it works 100%.

I have TMDA running on my server but there are commercial versions, very cheap, which basically provide you with a POP box.

We have refined TMDA so that the sendmail logs get parsed for To: headers and those get added to the whitelist too, so if WE send an email to someone first, they are already on the whitelist. This is a great feature which I don't think is available commercially.