Hobgoblin
1st Oct 2005, 23:03
I know that to get a JAA Instrument Rating one has to do 50 hrs training or alternatively if one has a FAA Instrument one only has to do 15 hrs or so to convert.
My question is whether all 50 hours have to be done with a JAA aproved Flight Training Organisation? Can I not do a number of hours elsewhere (where it might be cheaper due to the currency exchange rate ;) ) and then fly a number of hours with an approved FTO, fly the test and be issued with a rating?
I've looked into a South African Instrument rating ( cost is approximately £2000 to £3000 for a multi depending on where you go) but the SA CAA do not accept the 14 ATPL subjects, and before they issue an IR you would have to sit their exams too:( . I'm sure training will be to the same high standard as anywhere else and besides I would have to convince an examiner that I am proficient before getting a JAA rating. I just don't see the sense in paying 50 hours at an extortionate rate when I can pay for 15.
Any thoughts?
My question is whether all 50 hours have to be done with a JAA aproved Flight Training Organisation? Can I not do a number of hours elsewhere (where it might be cheaper due to the currency exchange rate ;) ) and then fly a number of hours with an approved FTO, fly the test and be issued with a rating?
I've looked into a South African Instrument rating ( cost is approximately £2000 to £3000 for a multi depending on where you go) but the SA CAA do not accept the 14 ATPL subjects, and before they issue an IR you would have to sit their exams too:( . I'm sure training will be to the same high standard as anywhere else and besides I would have to convince an examiner that I am proficient before getting a JAA rating. I just don't see the sense in paying 50 hours at an extortionate rate when I can pay for 15.
Any thoughts?