PDA

View Full Version : How hot are Hot brakes


Hudson
22nd Feb 2005, 11:49
It is good airmanship to check the temperature of the brakes during a walk-around inspection between landings. However, without a brake temperature gauge in the cockpit to read specific figures, it becomes a matter of subjective assessment based on experience.

One Boeing instructor told me that if you cannot hold your hand on the brake assemblies without burning yourself, then by definition the brakes are hot and appropriate time factors should be applied. I also read that in one of the early editions of the Boeing Airliner magazine.

With the trend for 30 minute turn-arounds, one man's hot brakes is another man's warm brakes. In one small airline I operated with, you could tell which pilots had flown the previous leg as some were heavy footed and you could invariably rely on a hot brake walk-around, while other pilots were better operators and used accurate threshold speeds coupled with proper reverse thrust and judicious use of manual brakes. Result was cool brakes and no risk of burning your hand. Autobrakes always heated up the brakes, which is why we did not use autobrakes unless absolutely necessary (slippery short runway, very strong crosswinds and short runway etc).

I would be most interested in other views on the subject of how hot is hot in terms of your own the walk-around check. More to the point what do you do about it - especially on quick turn-arounds.

spannersatcx
22nd Feb 2005, 12:13
One Boeing instructor told me that if you cannot hold your hand on the brake assemblies without burning yourself, then by definition the brakes are hot

I would never touch a brake after a landing, you're likely to suffer extreme burns. Sorry but I've never heard anything so ridiculous in 20+ years. :{

Tallbloke
22nd Feb 2005, 12:20
Not answering the question at all but...

I seem to remember reading somewhere that brake temperature must be below a certain temperature (obviously it varies by type) before departure, such that the brakes are sufficiently cold to deal with RTO. Does this figure change with runway length, take-off weight etc. or do manufacturers apply a blanket figure?

I wonder what impact brake cooling rates have on turnround time, and would LoCo's be more prone to using thrust reverse rather than brakes in order to keep temps down (I imagine it would also keep wear down if brakes are on-condition items, however I am completely ignorant of whether they are or not)

CaptainProp
22nd Feb 2005, 17:11
Check temp gauge on lower ECAM!!! ;) ;)

Slick
22nd Feb 2005, 18:30
Hudson very interesting question!

C Prop, even if you have one im not sure completely addresses the problem. To the best of my knowledge Boeing test useing half worn cold brakes, Im not sure there is any data available, other than advisiory for any other config.

Quick turn and brake cooling schedule charts only, as im sure you are aware adress the fuse plug issue and not the ability of the brakes to absorb the energy during a high speed abort, I believe crews are misled in this area.

I personally agree with your Boeing instructor, and while i dont actually touch em I do get close!

What do I do about it, as you said try to plan a landing which will result in the coolest brake temp, and rarely flex after a short landing with a quick turn.

I am interested to hear views on releasing brakes after shutdown.

Rgds

LEM
22nd Feb 2005, 19:47
On the classic, there is no gauge, so after a crew change there's little you can do about assessment...

I personally approach my hand to the brake assembly, WITHOUT touching, just to have a vague idea... but actually, there is no way in which we can make a GO- NOGO decision.

If the previous crew landed below the max quick turnaround weight, then it's safe to takeoff. Period.

Personal assessments are b******* over these grounds, I think.

Re the need to release the brakes after parking: no doubt it's good airmanship to do that ASAP.

oldebloke
22nd Feb 2005, 23:45
On the B727 ,didn't have any Indication of 'how warm the brakes were'but if the station stop was less that 45mins-with high ambient temps one was advised to allow the gear to dangle in the slipstream for a period to avoid 'Hot Gear/fire 'indications...
Used to watch BA747 dangling the gear enroute to SEA from YVR,to have the gear 'cool' for the heavy Takeoff ex SEA-LHR.
On the 320 we had temp' indication-Auto brake LOW provided uniform temps which didn't seem to be a problem at Takeoff time,as opposed to heavy footed arrivals requiring some delays (or the gear fans if equiped)....
cheers..:ok:

Terraplaneblues
23rd Feb 2005, 12:32
767

350°C approx threshold from normal to hot
>410°C is hot
will read up to >670°C

Slick
23rd Feb 2005, 14:28
LEM, you could be one minute below quick turn time, a long taxi and subsequent high speed RTO near brake engery, and fuse plug melt temperatures could result in increased stopping distances and or tyre deflation. You are operating in an area that was not tested and is as far as I know not required by any agency, can you imagine the complexity of the charts, or the restrictive nature of those charts.

I appricate there is much fat built into the quick turn and brake cooling schedules which are regulatory requirements for (fuse plug) no melt requirements, however I do not believe the issue is quite (period) as you said, I am talking about a highly unlikely combination of events, however!

If you have access to a document which contridicts what I have said could you please direct me, the information I have is from a type specific perf engineers course at Boeing, could be that maybe I misunderstood, it was quite some time ago.

Many thanks

Paul Wilson
23rd Feb 2005, 15:21
I know that AP Racing use stick on thermometers to measure individual caliper temperatures when testing new brakes, and on race cars during events. They are the multi colour types and have a greater temp range than you would require (amazing how hot you can let stuff get if you don't care about durability)

Would that be the sort of thing that a Flight Safety/Engineering dept. would be interested in putting on to see what was happening in the real world? Cost is minimal, in the order of a couple of £s each. Wouldn't have thought it would be a check every time thing, but would be usefull to get a "feel" for what did what to the temps. It could also act as a condition monitoring device, i.e. why is that one higher than that one? Could pick up a dragging brake that might not be felt.

CaptainSandL
23rd Feb 2005, 20:49
Crikey Hudson, are you sure that Boeing instructor was not pulling your leg?

!!! NEVER TOUCH THE BRAKES WITH YOUR HANDS !!!

I check my brake temps on a turnaround by touching the tyres with the back of my fingers. This will give an approximate indication of brake temp.

The back of the fingers trick I learnt from a fireman on one of my refresher courses, this is how they check the temp of a door or similar to judge how hot the fire is behind it. They use the back of the fingers because a) They are less sensitive so will be less painful if burnt and b) If an object is very hot the fingers will involentarily close around the hot object and you can't let go!

Back to your question. I cant quantify it but having touched my tyres on every turnaround I have ever done, I now know when they feel hot. If I find hot brakes (rare) I will get the F/O to touch the tyres as well to make the point about the relationship between braking techniques and brake temperatures.

Milt
23rd Feb 2005, 22:12
Hot Brakes

Simply put - your aircraft brake disks, apart from creating high friction on demand, are a repository for energy you want to throw away.

The design of the brake units must be capable of absorbing close to ALL of the energy you have built up on a take off when you abort and execute a desperate stop.

Nearly All of that energy is converted to heat.

If you start off with brake units already storing a lot of heat then your capability to subsequently complete an accelerate -stop is voided. You will end up in a heap !!

Nurse them guys and appreciate their limitations.

Shaft109
24th Feb 2005, 01:48
If there are no gauges fitted there are some other accurate ways to tell brake temp visually:

Remeber the fish tank colour strips/stickers that changed to show the colour on the side? The were accurate to 1*c so something similar could be made or look at

Rally/Race car or high performance brake kits from Brembo or AP racing have 3 colours green, yellow, red paint that goes black when the max safe temp was exceeded and therefore the disks have to be changed.

This is especially true for carbon/ceramic applications as they have very high oxidation temps that when exceeded tend to burst into flames and braking effort fades gracefully away.

Look at the problems Porsche is having with its Ceramic Composite Braking system.

flightleader
24th Feb 2005, 05:05
I do the similar way as CaptainSandL. Put the tip of my fingers onto the inner part of the tyres closest to the rim or wheel. After some practises,you could develope a scle yourself.
My company used to operate 737-400 (landing wt 54,884kg) into strip with 5600ft in lenght. The strip is so short that its markings are a set of Ls painted white known as Boeing markers.(boeing reckon if you don't land within the markers you won't makeit at the end!). Those landings heats up the brakes alot. you can see the white smoke comes out from the brakes everytime. 9 years on and not a single burst tyre or overrun! Nowadays the shortest we do is 5900ft. Smokes still but not as much. DON"T PUT YOUR HAND IN WHEN IT SMOKES, NOT EVEN THE TYRES!!
Cheers!

Milt
24th Feb 2005, 05:26
Blow Out Plugs

Anyone know the temperature at the blow out plugs when they are supposed to let go and any relationship between maximum design brake pack limit and the blow out plugs.?

Presumably the plugs will blow sometime after a brake pack reaches max temp. due time taken for the heat to reach the plugs.

The fire service guys should know and then give firm advice regarding liquids quelling brake fires. Have seen the result of that. Everthing comes apart with a huge bang which can be fatal to those too close.

Then there was that Caravelle which had been used to run to and fro along a Swiss runway to clear fog. Some time after the gear was put in the holes the resulting fire was terminal..

oldebloke
24th Feb 2005, 07:34
I seem to remember the 'plugs' let go about 500 degrees(had them up to 480 on a 'reject'320)...True some of the tires settle quit a time after the aircraft has stopped,after rejects,as you say the heat builds......:ok:

Paul Wilson
24th Feb 2005, 07:44
Remeber the fish tank colour strips/stickers that changed to show the colour on the side? The were accurate to 1*c so something similar could be made or looked at

These exist and were what I was talking about above. the technology that AP Racing and the like use in raceing cars is incredible.

For 1 season they made Berylium calipers for F1 before they were banned, excellent properties from an engineering standpoint, but the dust/swarf was cancerous, machining could only be done in 1 factory in ex USSR and one in USA, and the billet of material for each caliper was something over £10,000.

If you were to give them a ring I'm sure they would send you a couple of temperature strips to play with.

JEP
24th Feb 2005, 09:10
I would suggest an Infrared Thermometer.
Just point it at the brake disc, tyre or whatever surface you want to measure, (your colleageus forehead if fever is suspected being the reason for strange behaviour)
and you will get a reading with a few % accuracy.

The ones I know measure up to 500 °C

It is a handheld thing sold at around 150 EUR.

Milt
24th Feb 2005, 22:37
oldebloke

How did you know the blow out plugs reached 480 degrees?

Has anyone been close to one when it let go?

And when one does lets go is the rim a throw-away or does maint just screw in a replacement?

And now you have me wondering what the metal composition is - must be some sort of alloy.

Old Smokey
25th Feb 2005, 00:38
Milt,

I can't answer the first 2 questions, but..

Q 3. New plugs are "screwed" in, they are designed to protect the tyre and the rim

Q 4. They're made of a Stannic (Tin) alloy.

Regards,

Old Smokey

mcdhu
25th Feb 2005, 10:59
The fusible plugs in the A320 family melt around 900C and this is the temp at which maintenance action is required anyway. I've never seen them above 500!

Cheers,
mcdhu

FE Hoppy
25th Feb 2005, 11:48
I seem to remember that fuse plugs come in three different colours that melt at 3 design temps. Can't be bothered to look up the temperatures but anyone thinking of touching a brake unit to see how hot it is should not be allowed near an aircraft..

mutt
25th Feb 2005, 12:24
Slick,

To the best of my knowledge Boeing test useing half worn cold brakes

Totally depends on when the aircraft was certified, the present FAR's (25.109) states A flight test demonstration of the maximum brake kinetic energyaccelerate-stop distance must be conducted with not more than 10 percent of the allowable brake wear range remaining on each of the airplane wheel
brakes. However, that only applies to aircraft certified post 1998.

Mutt.

FullWings
25th Feb 2005, 18:34
To get back to the original question, I have no idea how hot (or not) a brake should be in normal (or abnormal) use - I am not privy to that information. A brake unit at 200C is too hot to touch, as is one at 500C.

Unless you have a brake temperature monitoring system and some sort of guidance, go into the QRH with the prevailing conditions and the landing wt. (max if you don't have it) and see what it says about cooling times.

One of the things to check for if you don't have a monitor system is that that braking energy has been spread fairly equally between units. If one is smoking and another is cold, you have a problem.

Some manufacturers recommend leaving the gear extended for a few minutes after takeoff in certain situations to ensure adequate cooling; obviously not after a heavy V1 cut but it seems to be accepted practice on a 'short turnaround'.

Jambo Buana
25th Feb 2005, 21:20
On the Boeing Customer 1 (C1) flight, you will demonstrate that the plane you are about to buy RTO's correctly. Normally from 100-110 kts depending on the Boeing test pilot. Doing my first C1 with a real nice old boy (30 yrs in test flight) I asked him if I should leave the parking brake OFF after taxi in having rejected at Boeing Field at 110kts, new brakes (steel CAT C) smoking like mad. 'Boy, there's no energy in those brakes.' Is what he said. LWT was around 50 tons, 15 tons below MLWT. That was a nice calibration ride, the fuse plugs were miles away from going, but perhaps the next RTO, 20 mins later, Field Length Limited would be exciting!

Hudson
26th Feb 2005, 11:28
Jambo B. Interesting comment by your Boeing test pilot in which he implies that a 110 knot abort at 50 tonnes is a low energy event and nothing to worry about.

He is right, of course. But it makes me wonder why Boeing select 80 knots as the upper limit speed for an abort based purely on a Master caution light appearing, when clearly a higher speed such as 100 knots might be equally as safe.

It has always concerned me that a engine overheat light appearing during the take off run at (say) 100 knots and well below V1 of any sort, is not a valid reason to abort - yet it is if it occurs below 80 knots.

An engine overheat light can also precede a fire warning and I think it would surely be prudent, if faced with an engine overheat, to consider aborting it it came on say 20 knots below V1. It is just that 80 knots seems rather low in view of the Boeing test pilot's remark on low energy?

I understand that some B737 operators use 100 knots as the upper limit for an abort based on a Master Caution light alert. I think the A320 uses 100 knots, too?

Or is it possible that Boeing decided to kill two birds with one stone as it were, by having the normal 80 knot airspeed check as the dividing line for a Master Cautions go/stop? As usual, Boeing don't give reasons - it lets you fight it out among personal opinions. Fat lot of good that is.

r304ndy
1st Mar 2005, 19:40
First of all, in answering Milt's question on the 'blow-out' plugs, I'm guessing you meant the fuse plugs installed on the wheel rims. Fuse plugs prevent excessive tire pressure built up after excessive braking and during RTOs and as such have nothing to do with the temperature of the brake pack.

Second, aircraft with turnaround times of 30 mins or less would usually have brake-cooling fans installed. Brake-cooling fans are customer-specific items as such you won't find them on aircraft flying long-haul routes.

Dan Winterland
1st Mar 2005, 20:32
How hot are hot brakes? Dunno, but I bet PIA do!

goinggrey
1st Mar 2005, 21:45
A most dedicated Aircraft Engineer died,
as a result of an explosion of a B737 tyre, soon after arriving on stand, at Lagos International airport, in 1979.
May He Rest In Peace.

Unrelated to this event, every proper operator of jet aircraft worldwide now use nitrogen rather than compressed air to charge their aircraft tyres.

supercarb
2nd Mar 2005, 00:41
r304ndy, the fuse plugs are activated by temperature not pressure. After a high energy RTO the heat from the brake soaks into the wheel structure. Above a certain temperature level, the tensile strength of the wheel material starts to decrease. Eventually the wheel strength will degrade to the point where it can no longer contain the tyre pressure, at which point structural failure of the wheel occurs. To avoid such a failure the fuse plugs are set to release the tyre pressure before the wheel temperature reaches the critical level.

SeldomFixit
2nd Mar 2005, 00:59
Interesting question and one that leads to other areas of " Professionalism ", IMHO.
How hot is a brake ? What "resources" do you as a pilot or engineer have available to you in order to determine this ? Are there brake temp gauges installed ? Is there a digital thermometer available from your engineering organisation ? Can you see smoke ? If there is smoke, is there an accompanying odour ? Does the brake appear to be new ( colour of the carrier nice and fresh plus a ton of pedal fodder on the wear pin ) ? New brakes tend to " burn off " the build fluid which is a synthetic lube. Also, minor hydraulic fluid leakage will smoke off with a quite characteristic odour.
The suggestion to touch a brake has been, I would suggest, taken a little too literally. During a walkaround by either a ground engineer, F/E or Pilot if I did not see them hold their hand slightly above the brake, I would think that they are failing to use the resources available to them. It stands to reason that the closer you can put your hand, the cooler the brake. Experience will tell you if it is hot, or HOT !!! ( remember if it is suspected or confirmed to be HOT, there is a right and a wrong way to approach or exit the vicinity of that wheel )
This leads to the 2 most overlooked and undervalued resources I know of. Common sense and experience - and I don't just mean your own. What of the other resources available to you ? How many of you have built a relatonship of trust with some of your engineers or pilots that is built on mutual respect and acceptance of individual experience and demonstrated capacity ?
I stand to be flamed but if there are not situations where the word of a trusted partner in aviation cannot be taken at face value then we have come so far only to end up nowhere. A wise man will always evaluate the souce of his information and that should in many, but certainly not all lead to an acceptance that an " it's fine " reply from your ground engineer really is just that - nothing to worry about. To think that an " it's fine " is just an excuse to shirk work is an undervaluation of a fellow professional, in many cases. ( I would never assert that it's always true though ). His experience will have hopefully taught him that 30-45 minutes cooling on a widebody Airbus brake at around 375-400 indicated is actually no problem. Are you taught that releasing carbon brakes serves no purpose ? Check with your ground engineer. He may well have learned through experience that releasing them actually DOES speed up cooling. Consider the variables - what is the OAT ? Is there a cooling breeze ? Does the pack outlet impinge on the undercarriages ? How much time do I have ? is it a long taxy to the departure point ? Is it a busy period at the airport ? Would I expect a long hold ? Granted you may not always have the best resources available, so, err on the side of caution. Use cooling fans - whatever you have available to satisfy yourself that you can reach the FCOM/OPS manual limits
.
It's a wandering post, I know but if you can't smell a bird injestion before you see evidence of it, then you are not using all the resources available to you.

dmmoore
2nd Mar 2005, 08:36
Back in the dark ages of jet aviation we used a pyrometer to check brake temps on short turns. It worked well on the old iron brakes instaled on the DC-8-63 and the 747-100. The -200 had brake temp indicatiors installed.

The Boeing AFM had a brake cooling statement and a chart that could be used to calculate minimum brake cooling time based on aircraft landing weight and the OAT. Landing at 635,000 at 0 dges C gave something close to 1+30 minimum ground time. We were scheduled for a 0+45 turn. We never made it and took delays on almost every flight until I stumbled into that statement in the AFM.

Pilot technique is a large factor. A lead footed pilot can get more heat in the brakes than the pilot that lets it roll using minimum braking force.

My standard trick was to walkaround the aircraft as I blocked it in and look at the brakes. If the arrival was before sun up, if they were glowing, I had my answer. If there were shimmers of heat raising between the gear, I had my answer. If they didn't give any indication of being hot, I would hold my hand over the inboard disk and feel for heat. If the temperature didn't get my attention, I would lightly touch the brake piston housing. If I could hold my hand on the brake housing we were good to go. This information was in a Boeing Airliner on more than one occasion dating from the mid 1970's.

Don

Milt
2nd Mar 2005, 21:50
Fuse Plugs and Hot Brakes.

This thread has shown that there are a few potentially dangerous myths and misunderstandings floating around concerning aircraft brakes and their limitations in being able to transform enormous amounts of kinetic energy into thermal energy and then dissipate that thermal/heat energy over time.

As stated earlier - ignore the energy already stored in overly hot brake packs, then follow with an aborted take off and I hope you can walk away from the heap off the end.

How many know the XXX millions of ft pnds of energy absorption capability designed into YOUR brakes.?
How many know the melt temperature of YOUR fuse plugs or even whether they are in your wheels.?

Please someone who knows give us a typical listing for a few heavies.

Here is one medium heavy out of the memory bank. F-111 brakes at 15 degrees C are designed to absorb 147 million ft pnds.

But it gets to be a bit complicated if you need to interpolate for a higher temperature start point than 15 degrees C. To enable these calculations you need to know the maximum design end temperature. The modern carbon disk brake pack apparently starts to go pear shaped around 1,000 degrees C

Knowing the numbers gives you the key to calculating how much you have left with brake pack temperatures above 15 C.

As an ageing TP, I seem to recall a figure of around 300,000,000+ ft pnds for a Valiant having 4 brake packs. Did an AUW full braking stop employing the old maxaret antiskid from a ground speed calculated to prove the design specs. Blew two tyres near the end of the roll out as two wheels locked up. Much smoke for 15 minutes or so as firecrew gingerly applied dry powder fire suppressant. Later examination of the disassembled brake units showed the extreme distress of most components. The disks were thick copper heavily chromium plated. Don't remember the peak temperatures reached but around 800 degrees would be a good guess..

Accelerate-stop testing is known by TPs to be extremely hazardous.

GotTheTshirt
2nd Mar 2005, 23:55
I guess most of it been covered here but a couple of comments.
Yes fuse plugs protect the tyre from busting in the event from high temperatures that generate hi pressures. These plugs just melt under hi temp and release the air pressure. Temp varies from aircraft to aircraft and wheel depending on the max tyre pressures.
Wheels that have blown fuse plugs just have a detailed inspection and crack check and new plugs installed.
Am surprised about the guy getting killed as the plugs hould have gone before then:confused:

Initially production certification was done for the RTO with new brakes. In fact it was normally practice to install brand new brakes for that particular test. The DC 10 overrun after RTO when it should have stopped in time ( NYC I think) caused a rethink and subseqent tests were done with worn brake PLUS an AD was issued that reduced allowable in service brake wear limits.

One point that has been missed is that the hi wheel temps do not only from from the brakes.
The normal flexing of the tyres during taxying at hi-weights is also a very good heat generator.
During some tyre problem we had with Dunlop tyres, Dunlop sent people out to investigate and they monitored tyre temperature on turnarounds with a temp probe that gave instant readings.
They also showed us a film of a V bomber ( Valiant I think) that was just towed up and down a runway at max weight with no braking and they tyre temps went off the clock! ;)

A-3TWENTY
5th Mar 2005, 19:29
Just turn the brake fun on....;)