Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

La Guardia to be completely rebuilt

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

La Guardia to be completely rebuilt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2015, 00:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,156
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
La Guardia to be completely rebuilt

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-10422671.html
PAXboy is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2015, 06:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NI
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Odd that in the Land of the Free Market, where the US Big Three rally against those 'subsidised' Middle East invaders... airports are built by government using public money.

The Q2 2015 profits from Delta and AA could fund this rebuilding; funny how they go quiet when it's their operations being subsidised.
El Bunto is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2015, 12:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: dodging CB clouds
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having flown in and out of LaGuardia last month, it was sad to see the iconic old American Airlines hangers being demolished. The terminal certainly does show it's age, and it's a bit of a congested mess, but by no means the worst out there. Still, a brand new terminal will be nice, the artist's impressions look good!


It's a very congested airport, where many aircraft have to queue up for departures, a la Heathrow, so I'm not so sure a new terminal will help things that much.
flying officer kite is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2015, 12:39
  #4 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,156
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
I only used it a couple of times more than 10 years ago so cannot tell but I do like your observation El Bunto.

Last edited by PAXboy; 29th Jul 2015 at 23:25.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 00:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Odd that in the Land of the Free Market, where the US Big Three rally against those 'subsidised' Middle East invaders... airports are built by government using public money.

The Q2 2015 profits from Delta and AA could fund this rebuilding; funny how they go quiet when it's their operations being subsidised.
Not especially, most countries have publicly owned airports. In some countries publicly owned airports are operated by private companies on a long term contract basis. Actually the UK is unusual in having privately owned and privately operated airports.

It's a very congested airport, where many aircraft have to queue up for departures, a la Heathrow, so I'm not so sure a new terminal will help things that much.
True, but LHR has largely resolved its terminal capacity problems, but successive governments stop it addressing its rwy capacity problems........

LGA does have a problem with space: hemmed in by water on three sides and a highway on the fourth with urbanisation beyond it.
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 13:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Global
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew in and out of LGA airport 2 times in my life so far. Last year, my flight was delayed 4 hours because of wind shear. My flight from Toronto was held due to the backlog. It's really a go-go airport, as soon as an aircraft lands, the holding aircraft is told to taxi into position and hold, takeoff immediately and let the inbound aircraft land. Any delay causes more of a ripple effect than most airports because the ATC is also restricted to the airspace they can utilize for another runway.

I hope in the new terminal they can utilize the space and improve efficiency but IMO they've reached capacity in terms of aircraft movement.
striker26 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 15:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they need another runway??
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2015, 15:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Global
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No way...space is a huge issue. They have 2 runways and pretty much operate only one. When they choose which one, im sure they have to give JFK and EWR a call to see which airspace they can utilize, they're very limited to air-space, ground-space and personal-space (man its like a bus stop checking in!)
striker26 is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2015, 13:33
  #9 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A new terminal won't move the birds on... I also see a lot of grumpy reactions in NYC because the Airtrain from LGA won't take people where they want to go.
MarkD is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.