Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

St. Helena Service

Old 9th Jul 2016, 14:11
  #361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone explain what all this means.
I wonder why the St. Helena Independent did not simply publish that AIP Supplement effective 23 June 2016. It is only 3 pages but it makes dramatic reading.
Until now that document is neither available from the St. Helena Government website nor from the St. Helena Air Access website, but here:

http://shared.burghhouse.com/sthelen...egulations.pdf

Last edited by volare7266; 9th Jul 2016 at 14:18. Reason: Link to details added
volare7266 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2016, 10:52
  #362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: West Midlands UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Volare7266
As far as I can ascertain, the "official" source of aeronautical publications for St Helena is via ATNS South Africa (the air traffic services provider) who have been contracted to handle this.
If you go to the ATNS SA website, choose "Products and Services", then "Air Traffic Management", look down to "Projects" and you will see the St Helena index page.

There's the full package of aerodrome info, approach plates and the AIP and AICs. (And the local aerodrome regulations you refer to.)

I'd have expected these to be accessible by a more friendly route, but perhaps that will be sorted out eventually.
Broken Biscuits is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 10:13
  #363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIP Supplement effective 23 June 2016. It is only 3 pages but it makes dramatic reading.
It does!

I note regulation 15 saying that SHA will coordinate any aircraft rescue activity but that they don't have any equipment and want a plan ahead. How were Comair or Atlantic Star intending to handle this? Engine failure (due, perhaps, to birdstrike) or gear damage (hard landing from all that windshear) would be tricky to repair with almost no facilities.
nicolai is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 18:13
  #364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: West Midlands UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Note from St Helena Government (via facebook) saying that the RMS St Helena voyages have been extended until July 2017.
However, it says "the airport is open" as evidenced by a medevac flight arriving/departing today and a "charter flight" arriving tomorrow (13th July). I am assuming another business jet or similar.

Hope the date doesn't signify anything!
Broken Biscuits is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 13:36
  #365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Woodbridge, Suffolk
Age: 71
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Broken Biscuits
Note from St Helena Government (via facebook) saying that the RMS St Helena voyages have been extended until July 2017.
However, it says "the airport is open" as evidenced by a medevac flight arriving/departing today and a "charter flight" arriving tomorrow (13th July). I am assuming another business jet or similar.

Hope the date doesn't signify anything!
The date of July 2017 probably reflects a 12 month extension to the time charter for the RMS St. Helena. According to "Equasis", the website of the Paris Memorandum on Port State Control, the last Special Survey was in October 2010; this must be wrong and the date must be 2015, as the Special Survey cycle is five years. That would suggest that the ship should be able to operate, without too much drama, until October 2020.

I wonder if, perhaps, the thinking is that the airport will have a year to get sorted out and if it is not sorted out by July 2017 then there will be three years to have a new ship built?
Methersgate is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2016, 15:55
  #366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: West Midlands UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight Calibration Services back

The Flight Calibration Services staff are back on St Helena with the South African chartered turboprop aircraft performing further calibration checks of the airport's navaids.

Today it looks as if they have been doing at least 3 orbits some 20 nautical miles out, which suggests to me they are checking out the VOR performance which was previously compromised by the position of the metal security fencing.

Maybe, if they find the performance acceptable, the blank VOR/DME approach will be authorised.

Not that that will help with turbulence and windshear problems, of course.
Broken Biscuits is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2016, 11:58
  #367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: France
Posts: 170
Received 18 Likes on 2 Posts
More info from SHG on developments at the airport:

Work continues to mitigate the challenges of wind shear at St Helena Airport. Safety remains paramount.
The Governor continues to chair weekly meetings of her senior technical and planning staff in order to understand the issues, make decisions, ensure the public are properly informed in a timely manner, and push forward all areas of work. These meetings began as soon as the issue of wind shear became apparent, and they continue. Councillors are represented at these meetings.
In terms of the northern and southern approach (Runways 20 and 02 respectively) we now have more than five months of weather data, plus reports of the experience of each of the nine flights that have so far operated various approaches into the Airport. Another aircraft is due to arrive tomorrow.
We are also installing more specialised equipment at the runway to monitor weather conditions and are employing computer and physical modelling to build a stronger picture of the conditions under which we will be asking aircraft to operate. All of this is building up a body of evidence.
Intensive work continues to consider an interim aircraft solution into the southern approach (Runway 02). A key issue here will be the level and frequency of tail wind speeds, given the constraints these can place on aircraft performance. We are gathering more data on both wind patterns and speeds to facilitate these considerations. Longer term solutions for using the northern approach (Runway 20) are receiving the same attention.
Meanwhile, medevac flights and smaller aircraft continue to operate at St Helena Airport, and the RMS extension is providing certainty of access for St Helenians.
SHG
26 July 2016
Ddraig Goch is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2016, 15:32
  #368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Woking
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are also installing more specialised equipment at the runway to monitor weather conditions and are employing computer and physical modelling to build a stronger picture of the conditions under which we will be asking aircraft to operate. All of this is building up a body of evidence.
Shouldn't that come first? Before the construction?
3Faze is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2016, 21:02
  #369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A key issue here will be the level and frequency of tail wind speeds, given the constraints these can place on aircraft performance. We are gathering more data on both wind patterns and speeds to facilitate these considerations.

Good luck with that, at any airport, where the crew need to make a decision based on a 6 hour arrival forecast made 6 hours in advice of decision time. i.e. the forecast is 12 hour old when you arrive in a culdesac low on fuel. I used to do that from Italy to Caribbean: load max full and blast off, but the airport was less dangerous and the altn was closer by. Even then it felt uncomfortable as the return crew was at destination not the alternate. One way or another the a/c needed to be at A not B.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2016, 08:06
  #370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pitcairn
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any update on the operational future of the airport? Did they eliminate windshear?
capricorn744 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2016, 08:47
  #371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'eliminating' windshear is going to be ambitious. Taking it into account and working with on the other hand....
CabinCrewe is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2016, 09:10
  #372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Tyneside
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by capricorn744
Any update on the operational future of the airport? Did they eliminate windshear?
Local reporter mentions speculation about rocks overlooking runway being blown up (!), ironically in this report about an 'open day': https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0Of599b9em0
Northern Flights is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2016, 14:48
  #373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pitcairn
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yesterday, 17th august, the Airlander 10 made it's first flight...it has a cruising speed of 80kts. The day the manufacturer will increase the pax load to 80-100 people, keeping the same speed, it might be a safer...even if slower...alternative to present aircraft (unless w.s. is eliminated by law) for the St.Helena trips...about 15 Hours from Walvis Bay (1200 NM), and about 22-23 Hours from CPT (1800NM)...it can even land anywhere else in the island, also straight to the apron, avidoiding (in VMC) both approach paths...
capricorn744 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2016, 13:15
  #374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Relocating at present.
Age: 63
Posts: 115
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airlander 10

Many a true word is spoken in jest.

SHG could have bought a fleet of ten Airlander's for the cost of Saint Helena airport. Or more sensibly a pair and have had £200m left over.

Now that would have been a pull for tourists, I'd have booked a trip to St Helena just for the flight.

Last edited by OPENDOOR; 20th Aug 2016 at 13:19. Reason: addition
OPENDOOR is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 07:17
  #375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Airships also have wind limits, the Zeppelin NT I have read is limted to 35 knots for takeoff and landing and one was destroyed by wind in Botswana. Given the south east trades blow more or less continuously I could imagine the wind might also be a issue for an airship, never mind the journey time. Given the prices they charge for trips in Friedrichshafen they do not seem cheap to operate either.
lederhosen is online now  
Old 1st Sep 2016, 21:51
  #376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Tyneside
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lord Foulkes getting very annoyed about it...

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk...-st-helenas-uk
Northern Flights is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 14:28
  #377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pitcairn
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airlander 10, some basic performance:
-All Weather Operations;
-T.O & LNDG: winds up to 35kts (choosing any headwind direction);
-Moored at the mast can withstand winds up to 80kts.
capricorn744 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 05:00
  #378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Marco Is., FL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm new to this forum but have been following the St. Helena saga for years. I worked on Ascension a few weeks in 1962 as an EE.. Retired from a US air carrier in 1989. I flew Convair 440's, Lockheed L-188's, L-1011's and DC-9-10,30 and 51's. The latter as Captain.
As I see the problem, it's the knee-jerk go-around response to windshear alarms that began in the '80's because of several accidents due to microbursts from thunderstorms on short finals. That is not the same as windshear at St. Helena and Funchal. I've observed lot's of YouTube from Funchal where the aircraft was clearly in an acceptable position to land and they went around. The first go-around of the 738 at St. Helena didn't seem to be much out of position either. The pilots commented that it was done because of a windshear alert. They need to turn it off at St. Helena, fly through the windshear and land 1000' from the end of the runway. Get rid of the displaced threshold and add another 10 kts. for the turbulence if you have to. The approach should be fairly predictable. Nobody's going to land in low ceilings or visibility or at night so don't fly into the cliff.
I think they should find a UK carrier to operate a 757-200 from the UK to Ascension to St. Helena to Capetown and return. There are still almost 800 of them flying. They cost a little more to fly than the A-3XX's and B-737 but they are a much more flexible aircraft. My carrier had 37 of them. When they came out in 1983, they could take off with 185 pass. on a 95ºF. day from N.Y.C. LGA 7000' rnwys. and fly against a 100 kt. headwind to LAX.
lolder is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2016, 12:10
  #379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: France
Posts: 170
Received 18 Likes on 2 Posts
Bad news on the reopening of the airport to larger commercial flights in this weeks Independent - it looks like the airport will not be used by 737s etc until next July 2017.

The link to the latest Independent 09/09/16 which includes articles on the Consulate Hotel closing because of the delays and more from Lord Ashcroft plus the payment to Comair for not flying !:-
Latest issues | The St Helena Independent | St Helena's 1st ever online newspaper

This whole fiasco becomes worse and worse as time goes by!

nb the articles mentioned are too big to copy and paste hence the link above.
Ddraig Goch is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2016, 12:16
  #380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pitcairn
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem is 'a bit' expanding...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...n-285m-airport
capricorn744 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.