Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Mar 2017, 10:50
  #7581 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No the first flight this year was last weekend but they do run upto Christmas I think
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 13:01
  #7582 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do TCX fly to JFK at all in winter?
For next winter TCX presently showing 2-3 weekly to JFK until 12 December, on Tue/Thu and some Fridays. Meaning on Tue/Thu and some Fridays VS and TCX both fly to JFK - but neither fly on Mon/Wed/Sat.

TCX has yet to load any longhaul routes beyond mid December so still time for more changes. Good to see them at least trying JFK in the winter, with the AA/VS/DL cuts to JFK perhaps TCX might now be tempted to offer a little more frequency themselves.
Logohu is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 13:30
  #7583 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Manchester
Age: 58
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do TCX interline with any domestic US services ?
wingeel is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 17:36
  #7584 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TCX interlines with JetBlue.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 17:38
  #7585 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably never make it off paper, but:

https://www.saifair.com/

Aiming to start MAN-LHE/ISB first, with CMB/ATQ/Shylet to follow.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 17:40
  #7586 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW England
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LAX_LHR
Not hit the popularity of flights? That's why the 2 new routes end a month early and JFK/ATL have probably their weakest season yet? Makes total sense that statement!
In the case of BOS and SFO, they're also up against Thomas Cook.
116d is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 17:41
  #7587 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW England
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dobbo_Dobbo
I'd like to think another aircraft would be added to this to fill out these schedules (say to 5/6x weekly) and operate another route (eg SFO). I think it is important to keep the reliability of the ATL flight and try and bed in JFK to a similar standard.
Agreed entirely. Have a schedule which isn't daily isn't very attractive to business flyers. JFK is a worry given the further reduction in frequencies with AA's service.

Does anybody know how UA is faring with its EWR route given the recent axing of IAD?
116d is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 18:49
  #7588 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/Virgin-man-fran-flight-manchester-to-san-francisco/?WT.mc_id=tmg_share_tw

New San Francisco service is getting a leg up.
Navpi is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 19:44
  #7589 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK & Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How important are daily flights to the west coast of the US? I don't work in an industry with significant business travel, so I've no direct experience. I know it is a prettier schedule, but would many business send an employe to the west coast for <24 hours given the travel time? Would they not be more likely attend a number of meetings, training events and/or conferences which usually take several days? Particularly given the jet-lag on the return east bound. The anecdotal stories I've herd from friends suggests that travel over that kind of distance is rarely a single overnight.

I think any form of direct link is to be encouraged and supported. There is no reason a traveller couldn't fly MAN-SFO and SFO-ATL/JFK-MAN on the return with DL/VS?
brian_dromey is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 20:01
  #7590 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,476
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
In amongst the "poor me" Manchester comments about Virgin's planned winter programme, has anyone stopped to consider that a) they may be short of either aircraft or crew resources or both for reasons including but not limited to continued re-fleeting - just look at the impact that's had at Finnair - and b) in deciding where to cut, route profitability will be a primary factor in decision making alongside (presumably) protecting their LHR slots. If the MAN routes were the cash cows that you'd believe from reading some of these comments, they would either not be making these harsh cuts or Delta would be swinging back in to operate them under the joint venture. The fact that neither is happening speaks volumes.
Flightrider is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 20:41
  #7591 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flightrider
In amongst the "poor me" Manchester comments about Virgin's planned winter programme, has anyone stopped to consider that a) they may be short of either aircraft or crew resources or both for reasons including but not limited to continued re-fleeting - just look at the impact that's had at Finnair - and b) in deciding where to cut, route profitability will be a primary factor in decision making alongside (presumably) protecting their LHR slots. If the MAN routes were the cash cows that you'd believe from reading some of these comments, they would either not be making these harsh cuts or Delta would be swinging back in to operate them under the joint venture. The fact that neither is happening speaks volumes.
Delta are swinging in to operate MAN-ATL next month on the B777...
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 20:43
  #7592 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brian_dromey
How important are daily flights to the west coast of the US? I don't work in an industry with significant business travel, so I've no direct experience. I know it is a prettier schedule, but would many business send an employe to the west coast for <24 hours given the travel time? Would they not be more likely attend a number of meetings, training events and/or conferences which usually take several days? Particularly given the jet-lag on the return east bound. The anecdotal stories I've herd from friends suggests that travel over that kind of distance is rarely a single overnight.

I think any form of direct link is to be encouraged and supported. There is no reason a traveller couldn't fly MAN-SFO and SFO-ATL/JFK-MAN on the return with DL/VS?
Trouble is business always locates in the best place for their networks. Say a Manchester based tech company grows quickly, it might come under pressure to relocate close to LHR for better access.

Anyway, lets how the service is retained in 2018 and beyond.
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 21:51
  #7593 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't noticed any "poor me" Manchester comments - more surprise on just how deep the cuts are for next winter compared to previous years. This can only be due to a larger than usual downturn in expected travel demand for whatever reasons. If the demand and profit was there the airlines would provide the supply.

MAN has always struggled with much lower winter demand to the USA compared to summer. Airlines have traditionally reduced frequencies, or in some cases taken a complete break from January to March. Take JFK for example where up to 4 daily wide body services operate through the summer months, usually reducing to 1 or at most 2 daily in the winter. Next winter looks particularly thin, but having said that MAN has fared better than some airports who have lost their transatlantic links altogether.

As someone else said it's cyclical. We've had the boom, now we appear to be on a downturn. When demand returns so will the flights.
Logohu is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 08:28
  #7594 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When Virgin take over the JFK flights from Delta, I don't think we should overlook the issue of capacity provided by the different aircraft.

In summer, Delta's B763, which I think is normally the 226 seat version with 26 in Business, is being replaced by the 266 seat A333 of Virgin. (Is the latter slightly reduced after the Upper Class refits?).

In winter, Delta operated a mix of the B763 and 757, the latter with 168 seats according to seat guru and only 16 in Business.

The same applied when VS took over the ATL flights, the A333 replacing a B763.

The other factor is that VS are more premium heavy than DL.
MANFOD is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 11:31
  #7595 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW England
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flightrider
In amongst the "poor me" Manchester comments about Virgin's planned winter programme, has anyone stopped to consider that a) they may be short of either aircraft or crew resources or both for reasons including but not limited to continued re-fleeting - just look at the impact that's had at Finnair - and b) in deciding where to cut, route profitability will be a primary factor in decision making alongside (presumably) protecting their LHR slots. If the MAN routes were the cash cows that you'd believe from reading some of these comments, they would either not be making these harsh cuts or Delta would be swinging back in to operate them under the joint venture. The fact that neither is happening speaks volumes.
It did cross my mind about aircraft as I see it's reported elsewhere the next 787 is due this month (if not already) then the remaining 3 delivered in 2018. Could it be there are a handful of A340's due to go off-lease later this year?

That said, I still think the weak £ vs the $ is having some sort of impact somewhere and I think any comments about the route needing the frequencies to grow are perfectly valid. I'd be interested to see the loading figures 12 months from now once we've gone through the summer and winter seasons.
116d is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 11:40
  #7596 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW England
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dobbo_Dobbo
Trouble is business always locates in the best place for their networks. Say a Manchester based tech company grows quickly, it might come under pressure to relocate close to LHR for better access.

Anyway, lets how the service is retained in 2018 and beyond.
Another factor for locating business in certain locations is personnel. People living/working in Manchester and its surrounding areas might not like the idea of moving to London/SE/Home Counties due to factors such as cost of living, change of commuting patterns, lifestyle, distance from friends and family etc. The same applies in reverse (e.g. BBC moving a few departments to Salford a few years ago). For example, many years ago my mother decided to leave her job when the company she worked for moved their office location to Manchester as it meant having to take a 45min train journey each way daily versus driving for 15mins each way daily.

On the flip side, there are of course some people who will move with their jobs, particularly if the alternative is unemployment, which is something another family member did 30 years ago by uprooting his young family from Liverpool to Hull when the firm he worked for moved their HQ.

If the cost of moving offices means losing personnel due to their unwillingness to re-locate and having to go on a recruitment drive to replace them, that will play a huge part in deciding whether to re-locate or not. Some skillsets are not as universally available as others.
116d is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 12:29
  #7597 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best thing we ever did move north
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 06:50
  #7598 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cathay Pacific have now confirmed they are going daily from 6th December instead of 6 weekly.

Fantastic news!
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 07:01
  #7599 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LAX_LHR
Cathay Pacific have now confirmed they are going daily from 6th December instead of 6 weekly.

Fantastic news!
Finally! Good news!
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 09:02
  #7600 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True that.

Here are the details. Great news. Daily on Cathay is a big deal. Especially after years of flirting with service, or further back, sending 744s via Europe.

10DEC17-06JAN18 MTWTFSS MANCHESTER /HONG KONG
..3.... MAN HKG 1155# 0730 CX 358 359*C
12.456. MAN HKG 1155# 0730 CX 358 359*C
......7 MAN HKG 1155# 0730 CX 358 359*C

In other "Airlines that love Manchester" news we have some scheduled links to Medina on the 787 from Saudi too:

01AUG17-28AUG17 MTWTFSS MANCHESTER /MEDINAH
08AUG 09AUG .23.... MAN MED 1100 1925 SV 124 789*C

The Hajj is end of August I believe - but am no expert, assume these flights are related.
110Cornets is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.