PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 01:00   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 75
QANTAS cancels 787 orders

Report on the BBC that QANTAS has cancelled its 787 orders
BBC News - Qantas cancels plane orders amid mounting losses

Last edited by Captain Capstan; 23rd Aug 2012 at 01:00.
Captain Capstan is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 02:41   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,341
Didn't AJ say he had the 787 price locked in until 2016? That is if QF is still around in 2016.

Time for another round of pay cuts for the pilots.

I can remember when those QF folks strutted around Asia like they were Delta pilots or something.

Times change with an OGA (Once Great Airline), don't ask me how I know.

And, just to clarify, are the orders for 15 787-8's still on track and just the -9's are canceled?

Last edited by Airbubba; 23rd Aug 2012 at 02:50.
Airbubba is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 04:03   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: My Stringy Brane
Posts: 344
The BBC article states:
Quote:
Qantas also cancelled orders for 35 Boeing Dreamliner jets...
Qantas had ordered a total of 50 787's:
30-Mar-2006 15 787-8
30-Mar-2006 15 787-9
30-Nov-2007 20 787-9
I'm not sure which LN's and series (mix?) will be received.
Machaca is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 04:31   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: EGKK
Age: 31
Posts: 597
Qantas cancels $US8.5bn 787-9 order after making $245m FY loss

Quote:
The decision to cancel the Dreamliner orders will still see 15 787-8s delivered to Jetstar in the second half of next year, but it means an effective two-year delay in arrival of the bigger 787-9s. The airline has kept 50 Boeing 787-9 options and purchase rights and brought them forward by almost two years for delivery from 2016.
Another nail in the coffin for Qantas, if I were a betting man I'd say not only the first 15, but all the (eventual) 787s will be operated by Jetstar. It's what Joyce wants
Localiser Green is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 08:37   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sussex and Asia
Posts: 177
Like many flag carriers they have lost the plot. For passengers there are far better airlines out there. I'd rate Quantas cabin crew on a par with BA in that they consider their customers to be an inconvenience.
Ye Olde Pilot is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 10:20   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: at the computer
Posts: 75
I think the crew are good. It's the piece of shit 767s they still fly between capitals that puts me off
1Charlie is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 10:47   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 250
Well, I travel on business and leisure on Australia's domestic system, and have been doing so for some time!
Qantas is so-so OK to travel with, Virgin are also so-so OK to travel with, but I will not fly in an Airbus anywhere, which cuts out Perth trips (my home town) with Virgins A330s, and completely blacks out Jetstar and the other minor A320 players.

So, with this upgrading of Jetstar to Boeing 787, it looks like I will be able to try out their services, which will greatly enhance my choices!

Sounds good to me....
EW73 is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 11:03   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 18
OT but I have to ask, EW73 - do you really refuse to fly anywhere on an Airbus aircraft? I'd be interested to know your reasons. What would you do if the plane was changed at the last minute - would you refuse to board?
Delight is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 12:50   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 57
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
but I will not fly in an Airbus anywhere
Without turning this into an A v B debate, would you care to elaborate?
Evanelpus is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 12:52   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 734
Quote:
but I will not fly in an Airbus anywhere
Without turning this into an A v B debate, would you care to elaborate?

Tableview is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 12:59   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 4,536
At the rate Boeing is going with 787 development and deliveries, Qantas probably calculated they were going to be delivered about 2040 anyway .....
WHBM is online now   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 14:13   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Next door
Age: 64
Posts: 49
Are Quantas really in that much trouble. The penalty clauses for backing out of a contract are huge... unless it suits Boeing (delivery schedule wise) and / or they have signed up for another Boeing.
Zoyberg is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 16:59   #13 (permalink)

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 788
Snoop

We will take them please as long as they are post line number 111 (B.A.s first hull).
Oh and the engines will have to swapped out for Trents.
gas path is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 18:24   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 18
I'm not suprised. Frequent flyer EU <-> Asia here, mostly using gulf companies (cattle class). I once flew Qantas via Heathrow and this was a really poor experience: worn-out 747 with very visible maintenance issues inside the cabin, seat pitch felt really small, terrible IFE (screens so tiny that no one over 40 can watch a movie) and the food was plain awful. Cabin crew really seemed to be hiding away from us passengers most of the time. Qantas might have the greatest pilots, I think they've handled the very serious A380 incident really well, but the rest is not up to par. I won't fly them again.

Last edited by alainthailande; 23rd Aug 2012 at 20:32. Reason: Correcting my broken english
alainthailande is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 23:23   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 46
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoyberg
Are Quantas really in that much trouble. The penalty clauses for backing out of a contract are huge... unless it suits Boeing (delivery schedule wise) and / or they have signed up for another Boeing.
Or not.

Joyce is pocketing $100M in this financial year and he can cancel his options with no cost apparently.
Romulus is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Aug 2012, 23:48   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 55
Will never fly Qantas again, and if they pair up with emirates, won't be flying them either, and I really like flying emirates.
Raggyman is offline   Reply
Old 24th Aug 2012, 03:11   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 13
For a while we saw Qantas ordering lots of new fuel efficient 787 aircraft well suited for long sectors, etc. A stark contrast in never taking up the opportunities to buy 777's but instead buying (cheap) A330's which never suited QF requirements.
Now the scene is set, the shining light Jetstar will get the 787's, leaving the Red (Internationbal) part of Qantas to struggle further into oblivion with inefficient large and not so large Airbus equipment to service less and less routes.
Meanwhile many airlines, including direct competitors, will see their 787 deliveries advanced thanks to Qantas, and run away with the prize.
QF have preserved many 787 options though, but let's see if they're taken up by whoever becomes the new Jetstar owner.
Guglielmo is offline   Reply
Old 24th Aug 2012, 08:40   #18 (permalink)
cym
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 209
Flew 4 sectors with QF earlier this year including LHR SIN on A380. Thought they provided excellent service on A380 and good service on 767 and 747 sectors.

Wish them all the best in resolving their problems
cym is offline   Reply
Old 24th Aug 2012, 12:28   #19 (permalink)
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 56
Posts: 6,340
The company is 91 years old so they are already in the most dangerous phase for a mature company. It is very difficult for a company to live beyond 100 years. I do not enjoy saying that but it is what I have observed in the world. From all that I have heard they are in a very similar position to their friends in BA.

For the record, I do not work in the industry and have never flown QF for the simple reason that I have never had the opportunity.
PAXboy is offline   Reply
Old 24th Aug 2012, 20:08   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Ireland
Age: 39
Posts: 141
Horsecrap

Paxboy,

The age of the company has bugger all to do with anything. AJ currently calls the shots, now either A: he's doing what he's doing because his back is against a wall or B: Some of the other wizards are right and there is a financial stroke going on.
All companies life changes - perhaps faster now than ever before, the sandpit airlines are putting it upto more established carriers - but that's a mindset of the carrier - how downtrodden the staff feel etc etc.
QF did a very good job when launching the 380 - in public at least it appeared very positive. The issue with the SIN A380 engine again handled well. The competition is there - the new guys from the sandpit are hitting hard on OZ land. It's upto QF management to stand up against the tide and get on with it. BUT AGE has shag all to do with it.

Regards
Shamrogue
Shamrogue is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 18:04.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".