PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 24th Apr 2012, 19:36   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 21
Future Sydney to London

Hi,

What would non-stop flight time be on a Sydney to London / London to Sydney route (17035km)? I have gotten a calculation of approximately 21hr 10min.

This is for some university work.

Thanks
Bjarnum is offline   Reply
Old 24th Apr 2012, 21:37   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Glasgow
Age: 64
Posts: 92
A Qantas B747-400, not on a passenger-carrying flight, did London to Sydney in 20 hours 9 minutes. That was in 1989. The return route has never been attempted since it would fly against the prevailing winds but would naturally take much longer.
StainesFS is offline   Reply
Old 24th Apr 2012, 22:51   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,774
Was it not the delivery flight of the first Qantas B744 trying to set a record.
I say this as I travelled (quite by chance) on the delivery flight of the second Qantas B744 from LHR in late Oct 89. This flight was not non-stop and only had two dozen or so passengers.
TSR2 is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 05:28   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AMM & BHX
Posts: 1,412
Didn't Tony Blair make a trip from BRU-MEL non stop in "BlairForce one" a BA777 around 2009? Add 30mins on top of that, you might get an accurate answer.
crewmeal is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 07:41   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 358
Yes BA did fly a 777 from Brussels direct to Sydney in 2006 (I think). Seem to remember that the time was around the 20 hour mark.
Ollie Onion is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 08:41   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: at home
Posts: 116
I think the Queen came back from Perth non stop last year ?
sam dilly is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 09:05   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 4,806
I believe a number of the Qantas A330s were delivered nonstop from Toulouse to Sydney. Also during the 1993 Paris Air Show an A340 departed the show, flew nonstop eastbound to Auckland, New Zealand, refuelled and carried on eastbound back to Paris, arriving just over 48 hours later, including the stop, so just under 24 hours each leg. Obviously going with the prevailing winds throughout.

I don't know whether your 21hr 10min for Sydney is eastbound or westbound, but I would expect it to take almost 2 hours more westbound than eastbound. Unlike Auckland, Sydney is sufficiently short of being halfway round the world that it wouldn't be worth carrying on eastwards.
WHBM is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 09:17   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 657
I think it might become possible with further developments of the 787 by Boeing. An all business class or club class if BA tried, is doable on the 345 and the 777-200LR also.
JSCL is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 10:16   #9 (permalink)

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big E
Age: 65
Posts: 1,203
I've said this many times before but pilot flight time rules would make this utterly, utterly impractical.

Such a route could only be flown by EU or Australian airlines. As far as the Europeans are concerned, there is quite enough blood on the carpet already over current and imminent FTL rules, which from memory go up to 17 hours absolute maximum. There is no way that European airlines would reopen that can of worms just for one route. The EU would never countenance another country's airlines operating into their territory with rules so divergent from their own.

Europe-Australia has never been that big a market and now Emirates etc have grabbed the lions' share of it. No point in stirring up a huge amount of grief re-writing the rule book just to be able to offer a product that arguably most passengers don't want or need anyway.
The SSK is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 10:22   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 173
I wouldnt want to miss my stopovers in HK, Bangkok or Singapore. Best part when travelling to UK
ChrisJ800 is online now   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 10:31   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 49
Posts: 1,865
According to Wiki Airbus are looking at developing the A350-900R for BA to fly non stop LHR-SYD. Pinch of salt required!!
TURIN is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 10:33   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 732
There is also passenger resistance to ultra-long non-stop flights. There is a trade-off between a shorter overall journey time and having a stop to stretch legs, buy overpriced duty frees, and so on.
Tableview is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 10:54   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tableview View Post
There is also passenger resistance to ultra-long non-stop flights. There is a trade-off between a shorter overall journey time and having a stop to stretch legs, buy overpriced duty frees, and so on.
I would add: there is also a fuel penalty associated with the non-stop flight, in that you're having to burn fuel to carry 20+ hours of fuel (plus the structural weight for tanks that size). I don't know whether that's outweighed by the fuel a lighter aircraft would burn in descent/landing/takeoff/climb from an intermediate airport.

I'd agree with The SSK that crew duty rules would also add huge costs to this. Two full flight deck crews and a dedicated crew rest area, perhaps? I'm far from convinced that any attainable yield premium (if indeed there is any) would overcome the operating cost disadvantage, especially as the existing big players on the kangaroo route (EK/EY/SQ etc) could rapidly and easily launch a price war to drive any new high-yield entrant away.

Just because a route might theoretically become technically feasible doesn't mean it's commercially sound (as the runaway commercial success of the A340-500 and B777-200LR has shown).
Cyrano is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 11:44   #14 (permalink)

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big E
Age: 65
Posts: 1,203
Cyrano: There are already two full FD crews on SIN nonstops, as far as I’m aware. For the extra five or so hours the unions would demand a fifth and even a sixth pilot, with dedicated bunk rest. And what about the cabin crew? They would need significant augmentation and far better onboard rest facilities.

But that’s only half the point. As you may or may not have noticed from the R&N forums, the European airlines are currently locked in an extremely bitter battle with the unions over the harmonisation of European FTL rules. The airlines’ goal is to come up with a package which will provide stability and predictability on what they actually and realistically want, which is nonstop capability to destinations defined by a perimeter of about 15-16 hours flying time, that is to say China, Japan, Singapore, Buenos Aires, W Coast USA.

There is a strong possibility that the airlines will get the package they want, or something pretty close, but it has been (and continues to be, as long as the issue is ‘live’) extremely bruising. Bear in mind that at one point the unions’ demands, based on the infamous Moebus Report, would have meant an end to nonstops by European airlines to Tokyo, HK, SIN etc (actually, double crew with a week’s hotel at the other end to ‘acclimatise’ for the journey home).

So, assuming the new EASA rules meet the airlines’ requirements, there is NO WAY that they will reopen the debate in the foreseeable future for the sake of a once a day nonstop with half the aircraft configured for those business passengers who absolutely need to save two hours, and the other half full of active and supernumerary crew and their rest facilities.
The SSK is offline   Reply
Old 25th Apr 2012, 12:13   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,398
No argument from me, sir! You leave me more convinced than ever that it's a non-starter.
Cyrano is offline   Reply
Old 29th Apr 2012, 21:31   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 37
Wouldn't the ability for European airlines to fly non-stop to SYD (or anywhere else for that matter) enable them to win back traffic from the likes of EK and EY? The idea of a 'one-stop' trip is very appealing (which you get with EY, EK etc. flying direct from many European airports via their ME hubs), whereas it takes two stops with BA, LH etc. (routing via their European hub and then SIN, or BKK etc.).

20 hours is a long trip, but with enough IFE I would do it
Imperator1300 is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 17:19   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 2,346
I'd hope they'd add a cleaning crew as well - 20+ hours.... the cabin will look & smell like a dump
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 21:07   #18 (permalink)
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 58
Posts: 7,046
All that - for two hours? Not going to happen.

Bear in mind that one of the reasons for Concorde being of less interest to biz pax was the ability to work in the lounge and on the flight due to the arrival of the laptop.

So the cost of all the special developments and extra crew would be paid for by a very small group. You would have to convince the boss and the shareholders that you were worth those two hours.

Better to sleep and arrive properly rested and then work with your colleagues/customer at the other end.
PAXboy is offline   Reply
Old 1st May 2012, 14:35   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 21
Great input everybody. Thank you so much!
Bjarnum is offline   Reply
Old 1st May 2012, 16:56   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hastings, UK and LA, USA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,491
For business, I will always choose direct over stopovers. Doesn't matter how long or how many airmiles I might lose by going with someone else. The total time is all that matters to me and many others. Hubs, stopovers are always a PITA.

Therefore, I think LHR-SYD would have a market.
AdamFrisch is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network