PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th Feb 2012, 19:00   #1 (permalink)
None but a blockhead
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 481
Small airports, big security hassles

Last yyear, I was returning to Edinburgh from Lerwick, and had a pebble confiscated from my hand luggage. It was a nice pebble, not very big, and I did ask what particular rule it contravened. I was told, rather unpleasantly, that pebbles over a certain size were not allowed, and this one was just over.

Common sense says don't react to snarky security, and never ask more than one question if they're not playing ball, so on I went.

Now I read that other Scottish island airports are getting a rep for over-zealous security, with Islay in particular turning into something from an Ealing Comedy.

I don't want to revive the tired old security theatre arguments again. But have other users of the HIAL airports found them OTT even by modern standards?
Self Loading Freight is online now   Reply
Old 7th Feb 2012, 20:14   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 940
Common sense says an oversize pebble may not be as it seems..That's probably why it was confiscated.

Palma can be worse that that - My wide bought a souvenirs that contained a liquid - Not only was it took, she suffered verbals..A male gave it her back after close scrutiny and realising it was bought in Majorca,
For some reason I always seem to get frisked, or my bag searched at BLK - Who cares?..Better a little inconvenience that being blown out of the sky.
I would be more worried if the security was lax.
Ernest Lanc's is offline   Reply
Old 7th Feb 2012, 21:29   #3 (permalink)
StandupfortheUlstermen
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Back in the land of the singing aardvarks looking for the escape hatch.....
Age: 42
Posts: 1,207
Quote:
Common sense says an oversize pebble may not be as it seems..
Isn't an oversize pebble a rock?

Quote:
My experience of a certain Belfast airport is quite the opposite.
Well, don't get too excited, Aldergrove and City are both as bad as each other security wise, it's depressing going home or more to the point, trying to come back this way.
Standard Noise is offline   Reply
Old 7th Feb 2012, 21:40   #4 (permalink)
e28 driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 189
I was operating out of Stornoway, and had poped into the station office to say hello. On the way out through security the security 'manager' proudly showed me a gun she had confiscated from one of our passengers. It had come from a christmas cracker, which should give you some idea of it's size, was coloured and would have fired a (tiny) stream of water!

I laughed and offered to take it and give it back to the passenger at the end of the flight and this, predictably, went down rather badly.

Last edited by TDK mk2; 8th Feb 2012 at 06:14.
TDK mk2 is offline   Reply
Old 7th Feb 2012, 23:28   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 940
Standard Noise

No - A small stone not unlike a pebble would be next in the pecking order.
Ernest Lanc's is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 07:08   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The most irrelevant place in the land
Posts: 750
They get it just right at Alderney - a couple of very kind people who check through bags uniformly.

At Guernsey, however... one woman going back up to Alderney was carrying a goldfish in a large polythene bag and had to persuade them not to put it through the x-ray machine. They're awful there.
Aero Mad is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 07:09   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DE74
Age: 39
Posts: 698
Would a small boulder be a large pebble?
egnxema is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 08:34   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: EGNX country
Age: 57
Posts: 146
Oh well, here goes :-

256 mm diameter : Boulder
64 to 256 mm dia : Cobble
4 to 64 mm dia : Pebble
2 to 4 mm dia : Gravel
1/16 to 2 mm dia : Sand
1/256 to 1/16 mm : Silt
1/256 : Clay

Sediment Description
handsfree is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 09:08   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 454
In 2004 I took a house brick through Manchester without any problem.

(And should you want to know why it was a sample of reclaimed Victorian engineering brick for an extension to my Victorian brick house)
Haven't a clue is online now   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 11:50   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 11
Odd security

When flying out to Scilly from penzance on Skybus in October 2001, they took away my Swiss army knife, put in in an envelope which was placed on the co-pilot's seat in the Islander - I was satin the seat behind the pilot!
Also again on my way to Scilly (I am a keen Birder) on the chopper this time, I was told on board by the cabin crew ladyI could'nt drink from the water bottle I produced from my pocket, on returning it to said pocket I felt my clasp knife, which I thought prudent not to mention!
St Mary's airport is a cracking place... Once saw a pilot land his twin otter, saunter over to the ground crew, who were practicing their putting, and have a few goes himself.
Don't see that at Heathrow!
Honeybuzzard is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 12:16   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 28
Posts: 137
Teesside. Definately small these days and consistently unpleasant whether passing thru the terminal as pax or gaining access at the gatehouse to the apron. Vile.
fa2fi is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 12:30   #12 (permalink)

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big E
Age: 63
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
one woman going back up to Alderney was carrying a goldfish in a large polythene bag
I suppose Guernsey to Alderney would fall outside EU rules? Otherwise they should have let her keep the goldfish but confiscated the water...
The SSK is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 13:08   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On the move
Posts: 406
Is a small pebble more dangerous than a bottle of whiskey then?
wawkrk is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 14:03   #14 (permalink)

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big E
Age: 63
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
Is a small pebble more dangerous than a bottle of whiskey then?
We're not talking about small pebbles here. That was made clear right at the beginning.

There was a well-publicised incident at Newcastle a couple of years ago when a passenger had a portion of pease pudding confiscated, it was thought to fall into the 'liquids and gels' category.
The SSK is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 14:13   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 218
The security at Hebridean airports would indeed border on the farcical were it not for the distressing effect on many passengers (not just the elderly and infirm) in situations where many are known to the staff.
Personally I will even brave the Calmac crossings in the depth of winter rather than subject myself to the indignities perpetrated by the jobsworths. Their excuse is that they never know when there might be a random inspection going on.
Quite frankly I do not believe that a terrorist would find it worthwhile in publicity value to target a Saab 340. Certainly that was the philosophy in New Zealand four years ago when the security screening in small airports was much more relaxed.
But then there is no place in the Bureaucratic Handbook for common sense. Mindless security is not good security.
scotbill is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 14:26   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 1,180
scotbill

All the more reason to have just as stringent security at smaller airports.

If terrorists were to believe that security was lax at small airports and they could quite easily overpower a small turboprop aircraft and fly it into a large building, trust me it would make headlines around the world.
smith is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 16:37   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 940
Quote:
All the more reason to have just as stringent security at smaller airports.
I agree - I have been inconvenienced at BLK as as my wife and daughter - Who cares if it keeps us safe.

My last contribution to the pebble debate. Pebbles come in all sizes, being pretty is not a reason for it not being confiscated..Example where would it end. a piece of coal polished would look pretty, do we let big lumps of coal though security which like a pebble could have been altered and could contain explosive.would not take much of an explosion at 30,000 feet to bring down an airliner,
My opinion is let the security people get on with their jobs and keep us safe in the air.

Another thing at smaller airports are like at BLK - Spoilers to stop terminals being rammed - I don't like the front of Blackpool airport, but I would like even less being rammed with a car full of explosives, while I was having a pint.
We live in dangerous times and we have to put up with inconvenience, if it keeeps us safe then we just put up with it.

Not just airports that confiscate - I took my 13 year old daughter to the 02 Appolo in Manchester to see a group called All Time Low - I had a miniature Bells on me and I was frisked and they took it - My intention was to drink it after the gig as it was brass monkeys, no use arguing it had to go.
I had to make to with near a £5 a pint of beer instead. I suppose bringing your own in a 5000 venue was silly, as they are just as much a target as an airport.
Ernest Lanc's is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 17:02   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ABZshire
Age: 55
Posts: 54
Pebble , take off your sock and put it in = weapon

Removal of a pebble from a Scottish beach is an offence.

Security staff may know the passenger, but what of the "stranger" in the queue behind you....
xraydice is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 17:36   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 218
Quote:
All the more reason to have just as stringent security at smaller airports.
Can I remind the self-righteous posters (who clearly do not fly to Scottish islands much) that we are talking about "security" which is more stringent than other airports.
In allowing the security pantomime to ruin the aviation experience to the extent that people avoid flying altogether, we have let the terrorists win.
Harrassing invalid pensioners rather than more likely suspects is not the way to go.
scotbill is offline   Reply
Old 8th Feb 2012, 18:01   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The most irrelevant place in the land
Posts: 750
Quote:
take off your sock and put it in = weapon
xraydice, you can tell us how a pebble in a sock is a weapon until you're blue in the face. But it annoys the hell out of the travelling public! Why? Because how many times has an ̀leach (or any Scotsman for that matter), however irate, turned a pebble and a sock into a weapon?? Few enough for us not to have our liberties restricted to that extent.

Quote:
Security staff may know the passenger, but what of the "stranger" in the queue behind you....
The stranger in the queue behind you doesn't matter if you're the one carrying the pebble, nor does it matter if you know the poor fellow!! Obviously if he's a complete stranger then that's another matter, but that is more than slightly unlikely in the Hebrides...


Quote:
Removal of a pebble from a Scottish beach is an offence.
Firing a cannon close to a dwelling house is illegal (Metropolitan Police Act 1839); the use of any slide upon ice or snow is also outlawed (Town Police Clauses Act 1847); driving cattle through the streets of London is prohibited (Metropolitan Streets Act 1867), it is also illegal to eat mince pies on Christmas Day (banned by Oliver Cromwell and never repealed), and according to the Holy Days and Fasting Days Act of 1551 (which has also yet to be repealed) everyone must attend church on Christmas Day on foot.

There is a common phrase at my alma mater, namely
goive. Perhaps you should look it up and take note.

I rest my case.
Aero Mad is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 17:33.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".