Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BOURNEMOUTH - 3

Old 4th Feb 2012, 17:40
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 43
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New York possible?

I have read this right havn't I?

There are seriously people who think a speculative one rotation a day route arriving at nearly 6 in the evening has been launched to open up international connections

This thread is the most surreal thing I have read all year!
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2012, 13:37
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK, sometimes USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with River Joint on this.

For those of us who have to work for a living and fund the transatlantic flights (i.e. not cheapest economy tickets), the last thing we need is another link in the chain to go wrong. Many of us are connecting to other US airports to end up in out of the way places where businesses are located all over the USA. So the key factor is travel time, availability of connections, availiability of business services at airports etc.

It's not uncommon to rack up a 15-20 hour 'door to door' journey time each way. This generally has to be done at the beginning and end of a working week. No one in this position and in their right mind would add another night or additional connection to the equation.

When planning new USA routes and connections airlines don't even consider the economy revenue and everything is based upon premium traffic. I just can't see Aer Arran laying on flights in the morning specifically to feed into the transatlantic market from Dublin.
airsmiles is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2012, 15:14
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great news about Aer Lingus.

What are the chances of a Belfast route say from Easyjet, FlyBe or Aer Lingus? The loads on the BE flights Belfast to Southampton route are always really healthy.
Andrew R is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2012, 18:06
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 43
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes because many people fly into Southampton as it is the cruise capital of northern Europe, to do business, attend the universities and take advantage of the unrivaled transport infrastructure.

Unfortunateky can't say the same for Bournemouth, well why would you fly to Bournemouth beach when you can fly to spain, France etc.
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 08:08
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What are the chances of a Belfast route
It was tried by Jet2 and did not work so was pulled. The economy was in a much better position back then as well.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 14:07
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: gillingham
Age: 28
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that bournemouth should now concentrate on keeping ryanair in for winter now, and once they get this. Get more routes, i feel easyjet would be a good area to start
smithy1995 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 14:27
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BFS

Jet2 ran a daily service at between 50 and 75% load over the S04 season. They pulled off the route due to insufficient demand and intense competition from Flybe. But to go from a daily 737-300 with not ghastly load factors, to zero frequency I think was too extreme. I believe the route could work at 4x weekly with a 737 sized a/c or daily ex sat with a Dash 8-400 sized a/c.
shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 15:48
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never realised Jet2 used to operate. Very interesting indeed. Would BMI Baby be a realistic option with say a 737-500?

I fly to Southampton from Belfast City on FlyBe at least once a month to see family. The loads on the Flybe BHD to SOU flight always seem to be really healthy which is surprising considering the average fare single is about £80+ pounds, whereas the average fare single to Bristol on EZY is about £40 pounds.

FlyBe are x3 daily to Southampton from Belfast and x2 daily at the weekends. Surely, as you say, there is a market for at least a 4x weekly to Bournemouth from Belfast on a 737 or a A319?

It annoys me that if I want to go anywhere in the South West of England I have to pay FlyBe's, high and sometimes extortionate fares to Southampton. Bristol isn't a option as realistically it's 2 hours drive to the South Coast or a trek cross country on buses and trains.

I'm really glad Aer Lingus regional are beginning flights from Dublin and I really hope it's successful. Maybe with more daily flights and/or larger aircraft.
Andrew R is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 18:03
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 43
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The two big guns of Easyjet and Ryanair are free to move into Bournemouth when they want. Yet still they don't? The key is yeild, not load factors.
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 20:40
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,523
Received 81 Likes on 56 Posts
I must be getting old or have I read this wrong - £80 to fly from Belfast to Southampton is
high and sometimes extortionate
??

No wonder airlines make no money.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 22:12
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not when it's a quarter of that to fly from Belfast to any London airport.
Andrew R is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2012, 10:07
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ferndown Dorset
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New York

The option to transit to and from New York was only put forward as likelihood for some of the Bournemouth area residents who are time rich but cash poor and have an aversion to London airports. It was never suggested that these opportunist passengers would be other than a tiny minority on the route.
Heathhurn is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2012, 10:28
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hants
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rivet Joint wrote
The two big guns of Easyjet and Ryanair are free to move into Bournemouth when they want. Yet still they don't?
???????? Ryanair moved into BOH years ago. 16 destinations this summer.
Just need to keep them there for the 3 winter months.

EasyJet have the 8 x weekly from Geneva. It would be great if they would offer a few more routes all year round but at least for the moment they keep coming back every winter.

LT
Le Tirer is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2012, 18:43
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South
Age: 43
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good points Le Tirer. I was refering to a substantial base though. More than one aircraft
Rivet Joint is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 15:50
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK, sometimes USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still don't see why people keep referring to having based aircraft? If I could fly to 20 or 30 destinations from Bournemouth I'd be very happy. I don't care a jot where the aircraft are based. 'W' patterns are fine with me!
airsmiles is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 15:54
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
The 'advantage' to an airport of having based aircraft is that the airline is more committed to the airport. They begin to build up an infrastructure of crews, ground staff, management, offices, equipment, contracts, etc which make withdrawal more costly and therefore less likely.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2012, 21:12
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Earth
Age: 34
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They begin to build up an infrastructure of crews, ground staff, management, offices, equipment, contracts, etc
Do they? Ryanair don't employ any ground staff or management at Bournemouth, they have no equipment there and their office comprises a room in a portakabin. Their crew would just be moved to another base, as they do with the rest of their crew.

All it would take for Ryanair to withdraw, and they threatened many times, would be for Servisair to start charging them the same price that they charge Thomson. With Servisair hemorrhaging money at Bournemouth, something has to give.
StevieW is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2012, 14:05
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Stevie,

Whilst I am sure you are right, Ryanair play by their own rules. My comment was correct in relation to most airlines, although creating a 'base' is less and less important, as you imply.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2012, 14:38
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not aware of the contractual arrangements between Servisair & Ryanair at BOH but why would a handling agent feel obligated to keep charges low to keep an airline there??? They are not a charity, they are a business - and one which is losing cash as you suggest should do something about the situation pronto.

They should put the charges up to cover costs as a bare minimum. If the airline doesn't like it, then its for the airport to "sweeten the pill " I would suggest.....
commit aviation is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2012, 18:47
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Earth
Age: 34
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't comment on why they let Ryanair walk over them, but they do. FR pay Servisair over three times less than Thomson do to handle an identical aircraft type at BOH. Servisair rely on auxiliary fees charged to Ryanair passengers at the airport (excess baggage etc), of which they receive a (small) cut.
StevieW is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.