PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th June 2008, 13:00   #41 (permalink)
blablabla
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: England
Posts: 23
Well if they are said to be parking 20 Aircraft for the winter season and they average 5 sets of crew per aircraft including cabin crew if they operate a 2/4 configuration then thats 30 people surplus per parked airframe so times that by 20 parked airframes and you come to the magic 600 figure........I know nothing about Ryanair and this is just my assumtion on these strange figures being quoted.

blablabla is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 13:02   #42 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: ireland
Posts: 67
nimble i agree, laying off 600 pilots means grounding in the region of 60 aircraft, this is close to 33% of the fleet, permanently! all that will do is allow the competition to expand to pick up the slack. Not what you would do if you where trying to force other companies to the wall now is it?
bia botal is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 13:17   #43 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 815
Quote:
But don't let facts get in the way of a good rumor even if it a bit dopey?
Remeber a rumour only becomes true after it has been officially denied!
smith is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 15:16   #44 (permalink)

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 35
Posts: 2,706
those who yak on about "ryanair taking deliveries" and "ryanair's expanding fleet" should look at the link below and note the number of "WFU/to be WFU" designations.
http://www.jethros.dwsitech.com/flee...in_service.htm

MOL flogs his aircraft until they get worn around the edges and then makes them someone else's problem. The fleet size hasn't grown that much in some time because of this practice, considering the number of deliveries.
MarkD is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 15:18   #45 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 103
Sounds like nonsense however O'leary made hay while the sun was shining hence the huge reserves. He's gong to need all of it soon because the RYR model is not geared towards this type of downturn and despite all his BS he knows it. Demand is falling off, the passenger base is disintegrating. No fuel hedging either..that alone will balance the books against RYR's other 'efficiencies'. Flying to tarmac strips in a farmer's field will not be cost effective when the wannabe ferry passengers can't stretch to it anymore.
Husky One is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 16:33   #46 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: leafy suburbs
Posts: 133
600 - impossible. I thought Ryan Air was a virtual airline, so there is only 1 employee!
keel beam is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 18:01   #47 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,305
Well they've alread got rid of all of their contract engineers at one main base
I worked for them at one stage when they were making hundreds of millions and it was not a pleasant place to work, I can only imagine how grim it must be now that their arse is to the wall, O Leary himself won't be worried about his next mortgage payment. My deepest sympathies to the employees at this time......
ASFKAP is offline  
Old 15th June 2008, 20:25   #48 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 78
Lots of the Brookfield guys have had their 1 month allocated to the winter. Some of the permanent staff will reach 900 hours early so can't fly anyway. Add to that annual leave allocation and the few that will take the unpaid leave and you already have a substantial reduction in capacity within normal ops. Im sure some of the Brookfield guys will also be told they arnt needed for a bit but I don't think people will get laid off in the traditional sense.
I Just Drive is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 00:07   #49 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Surrey
Posts: 16
Comparisons with Southwest are not valid.SW have hedged fuel at $51USD,Ryanair have hedged at
Charter Lad is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 01:26   #50 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cambs/Herts
Posts: 691
You might want something to be true; you might wish in your heart of hearts for something to be true, you might wish ill upon MOL and his supposed foul spawn of an airline, you might long for the day he and his bastard creation fall asunder but no matter how much you write it, read it, wish it, it is all just so much rumour and innuendo.
Most of what is written here amounts to a bucket full of lies and ignorance and when the aforementioned numbers do not come to pass, and Ryanair is one of the few survivors in years to come, what will you all write here to acknowledge the fact that you are wrong and know nothing?
Nothing!
Blarney, baloney and wishful thinking from all of you naysayers.
Sad and ignorant doubters, the lot of you.
History will prove the true facts.
rubik101 is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 09:10   #51 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the Right
Posts: 385
And all this was started by a Line Captain at Dublin...Must be true then. I'd imagine Howard Miller and Michael O'Leary had invited him round for tea and scones, then marched him off to the crewroom in order for him to share the news with his colleagues. However, like all hot inside Ryanair gossip, what was actually said (or never actually said at all in most cases) is blown out of all proportion in order to ensure the longevity of the rumour. It's like Chinese whispers. A story that starts off in one crewroom ends up being a different one in another. By the time it gets round the whole network it no longer bares any resemblance to the original story!
Callsign Kilo is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 09:28   #52 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: very close to STN!!
Age: 54
Posts: 430
better idea--

get rid of 600 base captains, and crew planning blah blah blah's.

we could roster ourselves---first start a list of who prefers earlies and who prefers lates.

there's a lot more intelligence flying in the flight deck than apparently sits on the ground.
stator vane is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 09:40   #53 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 638
Good point Kilo One… Rumors in the airline industry both mutate and spread faster than culture groups grow in Petri dishes in biology labs.
captjns is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 09:48   #54 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: dublin
Posts: 51
When he parks the 20 aircraft they will be used as spares and they will fly. Also he has offered unpaid leave for 3 months which means if you take it you will do 900 hours in 9 months.
top jock is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 10:17   #55 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cambs/Herts
Posts: 691
Seems a bit odd that the RYR advert sits atop this page, recruiting, yes, pilots!
rubik101 is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 11:07   #56 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Somewhere on a dodgy name badge
Posts: 48
The contrast in opinions between this, and other Ryanair threads, and the Silverjet threads running at the moment is quite astonishing.

On the one hand there exists a low cost carrier which provides nothing more than a point to point safe air service and makes no bones about the minimalist service. Ryanair flies new aircraft, the oldest being around 5 years old before it is replaced. The company makes millions, is expanding and provides well paid employment for around 1200 pilots.

On the other hand Silverjet was(my emphasis) an unadulterated luxury carrier, promising exceptional standards of customer service on point to point routes. They flew old aircraft, lost millions and put hundreds out of work.

Yet the vitriol hurled at Ryanair suggests that they are doing something wrong: whereas, Silverjet appear to be regarded as positvely saintly !!

Frankly it comes down to snobbery: you think air travel should be the preserve of the rich and that it should be shrouded in some glamourous fog. As the pilot, you should be idolised for doing such a skilled yet dangerous job and paid millions; women should throw themselves at your shiny black Oxfords as you parade through the terminal in your immaculate gold ringed uniform, scrambled egg adorning the peak of your company hat, on the way to your 5 star hotel, accompanied by a a swathe of stunning cabin crew.

Taking your own coffee and sandwiches really is a come down for you!

Snobbery: nothing more, nothing less.
Justin Cyder-Belvoir is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 11:25   #57 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 103
er..not quite Justin. There are plenty of LCC pilots on these forums who are fairly happy with their own operators but wouldn't touch O'learys mob with a 40ft pole. Many reasons there may be but snobbery doesn't come into it
Husky One is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 11:26   #58 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 838
Justin, since you clearly hate pilots so much then perhaps you should clear off from a Professional Pilots Rumour Network. Log onto the beeb instead and have a good moan there. Does MOL know you are logging on from work? Best get back to the grindstone and make sure your mobile isn't on charge either.
potkettleblack is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 11:41   #59 (permalink)
Justin Cyder-Belvoir
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Somewhere on a dodgy name badge
Posts: 48
Come, come my little black Le Creuset set, I don't hate pilots at all. Is it not the case that there are many and varied voices in these hallowed halls?

Were you sick on the day everyone else did CRM? Is an alternative view not valid ? Does advocacy ring a bell? Or did I just touch a raw nerve ?

Justin Cyder-Belvoir is offline  
Old 16th June 2008, 12:07   #60 (permalink)
The Trappist
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 62
Justin: '...my little black Le Creuset set,' The images are wonderful!

By the bye, '…air travel should be the preserve of the rich and that it should be shrouded in some glamorous fog.'

Absolutely spot on old chap! In fact, so much fog that we can't get airborne and can just walk around in our tailor-made uniform all day.

The Trappist is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Composit Tape Laying Machine? Ozgrade3 D & G General Aviation & Questions 5 21st April 2006 04:54
SA Airlink laying off pilots? contraxdog African Aviation 2 11th June 2005 16:29
Maersk Air laying off pilots niss Nordic Forum 2 24th May 2003 23:34
Gulfair laying off 60 hiring 60 alladin Airlines, Airports & Routes 10 7th May 2003 21:31
Can't get 'turned off'...!!! comeflymark Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting 4 5th March 2002 16:31


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".