PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th Dec 2011, 17:10   #1361 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: easy street
Age: 55
Posts: 1,830
A relative flew BHD-AMS this morning....counted 20 persons on board...
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 17:23   #1362 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern ireland
Posts: 458
I don't understand why they ddnt pick a route like Prague for the winter, at least they would have no competition, this goes for all the routes they decided to fly from Belfast. Seems like very poor planning and no original thinking
BHD2BFS is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 18:11   #1363 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belfast, UK
Age: 32
Posts: 780
They flew to Prague from BFS, last winter or the year before with a Cardiff based aircraft, think three times a week. If it was profitable then, I'm sure it would have returned.
BFS101 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 18:14   #1364 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 521
It would have been nice to see some different routes from BHD but I guess summer sun is a safety shot. Its not just WW having bad loads, someone posted on EMA a FUA flight, FR I presume with 7 pax. Ive flown TOM to canaries at this time of year with around 50 pax on a 757
mart901 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 09:03   #1365 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 358
Oh dear... From the IAG/BA/bmi announcement:

Quote:
· Significant price reduction if Lufthansa does not opt to sell bmibaby before completion
So IAG get bmi CHEAPER if baby comes along with mainline... That would seem to indicate that both parties don't see any value in baby! I really hope that someone picks up baby - today's announcement might just indicate Lufthansa will let it go really very cheaply rather than take less from IAG if baby has to go along with mainline.

Andy
EastMids is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 09:05   #1366 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 35
Posts: 3,099
That line in the press release is a significant kick in the teeth for Baby.

I really feel for them at the moment, they've been treated like a ginger stepchild for a long time and now this.

Here's hoping that they get bought by someone who knows what to do with them.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 09:21   #1367 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 521
Clearly low cost doesnt fit into BA's strategy! I reckon theres always some private venture capital company out there, some of them specialise in turning business's around or even rescuing them, like R-capital. It looks like LH will try to sell WW for any price so thats right up venture capital street.......buy it for little, turn it round and sell it for a load more 3 or so years later.
mart901 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 10:00   #1368 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wherever I can get a decent job
Posts: 597
I know they have their critics and to be honest I don't think they have ever been given the muscle needed to become a serious loco player but I have always had enjoyable on time flights with Baby and have (in general)served my local airport BHX very well and have a strong brand presence in the Midlands.

Good luck to all the staff concerned but it is clear that neither LH or BA see a future for Baby. BA are certainly not interested in low cost, at best BE take over some of their routes from BHX and maybe EMA, at worst the airline completely disappears with FR, Jet2 et al taking over any (if any?) profitable route pickings. I have my doubts that someone will buy it, if they do I think it will be a merger into another airline with the brand still disappearing. Very sad times indeed.
GayFriendly is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 10:01   #1369 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Age: 37
Posts: 1,522
The competition will be more confident than ever that bmibaby can be wiped off the map. Jet2 and Ryanair will ramp up EMA next summer and LH will simply wind up the operation. That's what I would expect now, if it is losing money, why would LH wait any longer than end of 2012 summer season to wind it up, given than bmi mainline will be gone and regional sale will likely will be complete.

Besides from a cost point of view, what shared services do bmi and bmibaby have? The cost benefit of WW using some bmi mainline services either management/head office/admin/systems etc etc add as appropriate, these will all become more expensive for WW as a standalone airline?

EI-BUD
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 11:04   #1370 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Coventry
Age: 37
Posts: 1,847
For Team America fans, I can't help thinking poor baby is left like our recently departed dear reader.

Quote:
I'm so ronery, nobody rikes me, and now I'm even less than worthless.
Sorry for those involved, I've never liked the name / brand but still a good service at a fair price, no complaints from the times I've used them.
jabird is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 11:57   #1371 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 20
Baby will grow up in to a fine upstanding member of the community now that it is likely to be freed from the shackles of uncaring parents. The future looks bright and the next few weeks are likely to bring positive news, the chance to really show what it can do and it should move with confidence in to the new year. Having it's destiny in it's own hands is a good thing.
20feetretard is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 19:15   #1372 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 1,294
Reading the press release from IAG today, there seem to be two alternatives re. bmibaby:

1. LH sell it before completing on the sale of the Group to IAG
2. LH fail to sell it, and take a lower price from IAG

If it has not been sold by the time LH complete the sale to IAG, it will go to IAG. I don't feel it's viable in LH without BMI. And LH want rid of it.

Unfortunately, baby is seen as a liability by both carriers - if it has any future, it will be under different ownership.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 07:15   #1373 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AMM & BHX
Posts: 966
Quote:
the chance to really show what it can do and it should move with confidence in to the new year. Having it's destiny in it's own hands is a good thing.
Closing 2 bases MAN & CWL. Not the wisest of moves in my view. To succeed the airline needs a lot of investment and to be properly marketed with proper advertising. Not using childish irritating voices sponsoring local ITV weather forecasts.
crewmeal is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 09:38   #1374 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 20
Closing the two bases was a requirement at the time. In your view it may not have been 'the wisest of moves' but with respect you were/are not likely to be aware of the circumstances both financial and operational that lead to the decision.
New owners will bring a new name and therefore a new brand. Baby will not be appropriate and therefore the current themed advertising will go.
Your other requirements to succeed will be met, why would you buy a company and then not invest in and market the product?
20feetretard is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 10:56   #1375 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 1,106
What's happening with the appeal re the Baby vs Peel court case in connection with MME - wasn't it £15M? Where would the liability for this lie? Could be a complicating fact in any sale.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 13:04   #1376 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Age: 37
Posts: 1,522
I think the MME case was settled some time ago, last year I think.
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 13:43   #1377 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 126
Quote:
I think the MME case was settled some time ago, last year I think.
Well the first decision was overturned on appeal, and that reversal itself was subject to appeal. AFAIK that is the current situation.
Which leads to:
Quote:
you were/are not likely to be aware of the circumstances both financial and operational that lead to the decision.
In relation to closing bases.
With respect to those whose job it is, or was, to make commercial decisions. If they had been correct at the time we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Waiting until summer of 2004 to try to expand, for example. Thereby having to sign up for punishingly expensive leases, and having to recruit anyone they could get their hands on at short notice. Even I could have done it better, and I'm just a driver.
On a positive note, a valid AOC, sound professional operations, good foothold on long term route structure. She's a going concern, and I hope there's a future.
16024 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 16:50   #1378 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,288
Any buyer will need to look beyond legacy 737's. Maybe it should purchase the BMIbrand name if BA decide to drop it. This seems inevitable.
ryan2000 is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 16:56   #1379 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IoM & Luton
Age: 49
Posts: 727
Don't you think the BMI brand is dead? It has had such negative press over the last year, who would want it? It has great people working for it but has been mis-managed for too long now.
I just hope IAG absorb the 'best' of the brand/people....
pabely is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 17:17   #1380 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 133
mart901 wrote :

Quote:
Clearly low cost doesnt fit into BA's strategy! I reckon theres always some private venture capital company out there, some of them specialise in turning business's around or even rescuing them, like R-capital. It looks like LH will try to sell WW for any price so thats right up venture capital street.......buy it for little, turn it round and sell it for a load more 3 or so years later.
BA have never been interested in low cost - even Go were not really low-cost.

Not sure baby is attractive to venture capitalists. There are no assets to speak of, so nothing to be stripped out. Old aircraft that need replacing - but with what penalties to get out of the leases? A brand which will need totally revamping or replacing, which takes time to build, in the face of established competitors such as Ryanair and the fast growing Jet2.

LH will now be keen to sell at any price, but I cannot see who will buy. Staff must hope for a purchaser however, because if it goes to BA they will shut it down - that is I suspect why the price paid to LH would be reduced, to covers the contingency costs of getting out of the leases etc.

MD
MidlandDeltic is offline  
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Closed Thread
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".