Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

British Airways - 2

Old 5th Apr 2009, 08:16
  #781 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the long haul destinations are gradually being depleted; all we have at LGW (and I dont mind being corrected) are MCO, Tampa and the Caribbean routes. How long will it be before these also move down to T5?
The LGW leisure routes will stay there for the medium term. There are neither enough slots at LHR nor spare capacity in T5 to move them over (T5 is now operating close to capacity). BA took advantage of Open Skies to move the LGW business-orientated routes to LHR, but Caribbean etc should remain at LGW at least until the 3rd runway opens.
LHR27C is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 12:25
  #782 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T5 is now operating close to capacity
Now that is concerning, if true. We're in a deep recession, BA traffic figures are seriously down, yet T5, portrayed as the holy grail for BA's future, is full? If that is true then BA's strategy is seriously flawed.

I think not.

Capacity is there. And more is coming with T5C.
Haven't a clue is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 15:05
  #783 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T5, even with the 2 satellites, was never going to be adequate for all BA's growth needs. Hence their limited additional use of T3 which will probably grow over time. One proposal in the late 80s was for T 3 and T5 to be fully linked by a large cut and cover trench with underground people movers and backup walkways as well as transfer baggage belts and backup roadway for tug drawn trolleys so that in effect they were one terminal with 2 entrances,- one in Central area (T3) and the other in T5. One day something of that sort will happen but it would have bee cheaper and easier to do at the outset.
Skylion is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 15:23
  #784 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,631
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Haven't a clue
Now that is concerning, if true. We're in a deep recession, BA traffic figures are seriously down, yet T5, portrayed as the holy grail for BA's future, is full? If that is true then BA's strategy is seriously flawed.

I think not.

Capacity is there. And more is coming with T5C.
T5C will only add gates, not terminal capacity for all the passenger handling functions, which are already overloaded at many times, in particular security checks.

The combination of the extra distance of T5 from London, and the longer time taken getting through the terminal because all destinations are mixed together, must have made a considerable hit in BA's domestic carryings. We have several in our office who say that transferring to BMI on the Scotland routes now saves them half an hour or more each way to/from London.
WHBM is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 16:46
  #785 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think not.

Capacity is there. And more is coming with T5C.
Incorrect, almost all the gates at T5C are already in use with coaching to and from the stands. When T5C opens it will just eliminate a lot of coaching. It will barely increase capacity at all.

Are you aware that BA operate to a number of destinations from T3 because there is not enough space in T5? It has long been known that T5 would never be big enough able to handle the entire BA operation. An unfortunate consequence of the space constraints at LHR.

One proposal in the late 80s was for T 3 and T5 to be fully linked by a large cut and cover trench with underground people movers and backup walkways as well as transfer baggage belts and backup roadway for tug drawn trolleys so that in effect they were one terminal with 2 entrances,- one in Central area (T3) and the other in T5. One day something of that sort will happen but it would have bee cheaper and easier to do at the outset.
There is a lot of talk of extending the T5 transit system from T5C over to T3 - seems sensible with oneworld connections etc.

The combination of the extra distance of T5 from London, and the longer time taken getting through the terminal because all destinations are mixed together, must have made a considerable hit in BA's domestic carryings. We have several in our office who say that transferring to BMI on the Scotland routes now saves them half an hour or more each way to/from London.
Oh come on, extra distance from London? All of about 2 minutes on the Hex. BA's domestic services are much more punctual than they used to be from T1, and more punctual than bmi's too. If it is such a big issue why are bmi downgrading domestic routes like ABZ to ERJs?

You are also ignoring the fact that a substantial proportion of BA's domestic pax are connecting onwards. Don't think they're going to be complaining that (virtually) all destinations are under one roof.
LHR27C is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 17:16
  #786 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chaps my apologies for suggesting T5C would add capacity. I meant people (which it should help with), not movements, and yes, I see that coaching to T5C stands is happening now.

What then is BA's strategy when the good times return? Moving flights from LGW will protect slots and save costs in the short term. But where then does the future growth come from? Not LHR, even with T3 integration. Not LGW no doubt. Madrid?
Haven't a clue is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 19:00
  #787 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The combination of the extra distance of T5 from London, and the longer time taken getting through the terminal because all destinations are mixed together, must have made a considerable hit in BA's domestic carryings.
What rubbish! It's 5 minutes more and less tressfull than T1. Walking all the way through the old T1 international route to another scurity check is more of a pain.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 22:34
  #788 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMI like all airlines is seriously struggling for revenue hence the size downgrading to ERJs (more to come i hear).
If you are to use heathrow then T5 outshines all the other terminals by a mile-shorthaul to longhaul transfers are a breeze and the baggage system is now up there with the best of them.
stormin norman is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2009, 23:08
  #789 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
BBC NEWS | Business | BA to miss 2008 revenue targets

March passenger numbers 2.61 Million down by 8.2% - Easter in 2008 will impact on overall numbers.

Premium passengers down 13%, overall yields down by 6.4% and forecasting of a full year Operating loss of £150 million and this excludes £75 million severance payoffs.
racedo is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 13:38
  #790 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paid-off BA bosses get re-employed - mirror.co.uk

OK its from the Daily Mirror, but could be interesting for fuller investigation
Tiger is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 13:42
  #791 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,631
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by LHR27C
Oh come on, extra distance from London? All of about 2 minutes on the Hex.
Originally Posted by Skipness One Echo
It's 5 minutes more and less stressfull than T1
I guess you guys don't actually do the journey much. What proportion of BA's outward domestic pax get to Heathrow on the HEx ? 2% ? When driving, the easiest way was into the Park One facility northside, then they shuttled you straight to the T1 door and the remaining distance was fairly short. No being mixed up with international passengers, no being forced to walk through a shopping centre.

Just because the HEx takes 2 mintes from starting from its platform at T123 to stopping at its platform at T5, doesn't mean the overall travel time is only up by 2 minutes. Even the Piccadilly Line only has half the number of its trains to T5 compared to the numbers that used to go to T1.
WHBM is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 15:26
  #792 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHBM it was T1 / 2 / 3 known as Heathrow Central, not just T1. You are being misleading. I might remind you that flying through T1 now means you ARE forced to go through the shopping centre that is the International Dep lounge as domestic search was removed. There is now another security check after security before you are allowed access to the old domestic pier. It's just as long a walk as T5 mate.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 19:09
  #793 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are hardly walking 'through' the shopping area in T1 to get to domestic departures. I always manage to quickly brush past WH Smith and then I am out of the shopping jungle! I have never been forced to go through the shopping area!

T1 is at times, far easier than T5, providing you know where you are going!

The second security check at T1 is done at T5 for domestic departures as well. However since you are already at the gate when this is done at T5, then perhaps we don't associate that wait as being linked to security since we are waiting at the gate anyway!
Mister Geezer is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 21:05
  #794 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: I'll go and ask the Captain
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And T1 has a smaller taxi time to the runways that are the most used, 27L, 27R. So the odd minute gained at T5 can be lost in the 20 minute line of a/c you will be in before take off.

6
6chimes is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 21:31
  #795 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
used T5 3 times, In all cases there was no queue for take off and a very small taxi time compared to when BA was at T1.
firstchoice7e7 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2009, 23:53
  #796 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just because the HEx takes 2 mintes from starting from its platform at T123 to stopping at its platform at T5, doesn't mean the overall travel time is only up by 2 minutes. Even the Piccadilly Line only has half the number of its trains to T5 compared to the numbers that used to go to T1.
There is no such thing as a train that goes to T1, there is Heathrow Central, and of course the Piccadilly Line has more services there because more passengers use T1,2,3 combined than use T5.

If you get off the train at Heathrow Central, you may have arrived at the relevant station a couple of minutes earlier, but you then have to get over to T1. Alternatively, stay on the train and when you get out at T5, take the lift direct to departures level. Overall there's barely anything in it.

When T5 was designed, there was a choice between the old T1 setup of a separate domestic and international area, or letting domestic pax mix with international to get the full range of airside facilities. BA/BAA went with the latter. Clearly there are going to be pluses and minuses of both - but for an airline like BA with a lot of premium customers even travelling on the domestic routes, having full access to the lounges for all is a major incentive to doing it the T5 way.

T1 has a smaller taxi time to the runways that are the most used, 27L, 27R. So the odd minute gained at T5 can be lost in the 20 minute line of a/c you will be in before take off.
Not really, because BA, especially shorthaul use the intersection departures a lot more than they used to. In addition, on 27s landing aircraft rolling long will have a much shorter taxi to T5 than T1. Even if it were the case that BA aircraft have an average longer taxi time, the fact that their on-time statistics have rocketed since they moved into T5 indicates it hasn't had an adverse effect on overall punctuality.
LHR27C is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2009, 16:33
  #797 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Is there a BA Timetable out there?

I see that BA have ceased publishing a PDF timetable on their website. (Interestingly OneWorld partner CX have restarted publishing - I picked one up at HKG last week.) I could get details from the OAG but does anyone know if there are details anywhere on the web (some enthusiasts site - they have their uses) which I could download?
Peter47 is online now  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 01:17
  #798 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,350
Received 70 Likes on 30 Posts
Peter47

Go to oneworld - Home and click on "downloadable timetables"........
ETOPS is online now  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 10:01
  #799 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: EDI-MCT
Age: 65
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to have the BA Desktop timetable application on my laptop, but I noticed recently that it was no longer updating. A quick visit to ba.com revealed that it was discontinued. However, there was a link to the Oneworld timetables, which lands you here:
oneworld - Downloadable Timetables

You can get a PDF copy of the timetables, but there are also downloadable tools for various types of hardware. I downloaded the desktop version and it is almost exactly like the old BA Desktop Timetable! Especially if you set the filter fo BA flights only...
computer jockey is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2009, 13:31
  #800 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks guys. I noticed that my BA desktop was not updating but I'll get by with the One World timetable!
Peter47 is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.