PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27th June 2009, 10:54   #1101 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hungerford, Berks.
Posts: 236
FLYboh - that's great - she knows the car park but thought there might be a seperate long term one. I am flying up myself next month. I wish they would hurry up and finish the terminal work!
Many Thanks
Kemac
KeMac is online now   Reply
Old 27th June 2009, 10:55   #1102 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 833
Quote:
HUGE potential for long-haul and so does Boeing, hence their belief in the B787 to offer direct flights from regions to regions long-haul rather than the hub approach taken by Airbus.
Excuse me - A330 ??
Groundloop is offline   Reply
Old 27th June 2009, 20:03   #1103 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 108
Now if I read those plans right all the new structures are white and existing buildings are grey. So the new main arched building accommodates the concourse, security and duty free and gates 4 , 5 and 6. At the airside end of that to the left there are three smaller arch structures for gates 1 –3, part of the departure lounge and retail outlets. The existing building to the left looking from none airside includes the existing 12 check in desks, the airside food servery, and seating area similar as it is today.
The existing low profile arrivals hall looks like it stays as the domestic arrivals hidden behind a screened fence with the new arrivals to its right, and here in lies my question.
As yet there does not seem any construction work being done in the new International arrivals area. At the Pilots forum in March it was stated that “the International Arrivals area was continually being reviewed to ensure best practice”!!!! what does that mean. We will get around to it when we can.?
So we have a new bit tacked on to a old bit, with an even older bit disguised behind a screen fence acting as both International and domestic arrivals until we have the money to finish the job.
This is only my take on what I see, I may be completely wrong and willing to be proved so. It’s just I’ve been around BOH too long to expect anything different.
Yankee is offline   Reply
Old 28th June 2009, 10:52   #1104 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Yankee thats exactly my concern too.

BOH did the same stupid thing back in 1980's when they built on the first module of a new terminal - only departures.

They cant be making such a big mistake again can they?

Dont BOH know they have to build for the future? They cannot build AFTER pax development, they need to build IN-ORDER to see pax development.

I do hope the reason is that they are fixing the main departure structures first before starting on the arrivals. They have cleared all the land ready
Nakata77 is offline   Reply
Old 28th June 2009, 14:40   #1105 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brighton uk
Posts: 148
The decision was made , while a delay occured with the New Forest commission objecting to expansion , to concentrate on the departures first as this was seen as being able to bring in some revenue from new shops , restaurant and duty free . There was also considerable congestion at peak times so it was thought better to build the departure area first ( again ! )

In the meantime a lot of leveling out was done at the new Arrivals area and this is expected to start when the bulk of the departure area is finished
With the extra cash that MAG group put in it could well start sooner though

Where the domestic arrivals area is , this area is also being cleared up and when decided new " rolling archways " can be fitted into this section

I do agree it really does seem cac handed to the extreme , but i do believe eventually the end result will make Bournemouth a much better experience and not before time
MARKEYD is online now   Reply
Old 29th June 2009, 17:18   #1106 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: planet earth
Posts: 60
were ezy considering basing a couple of aircraft in boh once the new terminal is finished. It would be good to see them add some more routes such as gla, ncl to make up for the poor times (ryanair!)and lack of domestic and city routes, ie paris, amsterdam, manchester etc
adfly is online now   Reply
Old 29th June 2009, 21:00   #1107 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 25
Apron - 747 capable?

Does anyone know will the new apron / stands and access taxiways be 747 capable once all the work is completed.? I have seen DC-10's on the apron but believe the 747's to date have got no further than the old 35/17 disused runway.
Knife-Edge is offline   Reply
Old 29th June 2009, 22:18   #1108 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: dorset
Posts: 96
Stands are configured for 737 800's. possibly could fit a 747 over more than one stand? but unsure if the taxiway through the apron would not be subsequently blocked. However, in any case the access taxiways to the apron both north and south are not wide enough for 747 under its own steam so you are probably not going to see one other than on the old runway 17/35.
tribekey is offline   Reply
Old 30th June 2009, 04:53   #1109 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Far far away
Posts: 31
747 Access

Access from the south could be a bit tricky, 747's etc could never use the old apron stands because of the weight factor, the ancient drainage system would simply collapse, (not sure if this is also true for the taxiway accross the old apron)
That's why they were alway's parked on 35 & pax bused to the a/c.
Also not sure if you enter from the south if there would be enough wing tip clearance as you pass the fire base/control tower & the first stand on the new apron.
Hopefully future plans have allowed access to be gained direct from the north side??
Thaimike is offline   Reply
Old 1st July 2009, 08:42   #1110 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sunshine coast
Posts: 328
Thomsons summer 2010

Mon - Dalaman & Corfu
Tue - Palma & Tenerife
Wed- Ibiza & Sharm El Sheikh
Thu- Palma & Bodrum
Fri - Malaga & Antalya
Sat - Palma & Rhodes
Sun - Tunisia & Paphos

Total of 14 rotations per week using their new B737-800
FLYboh is offline   Reply
Old 1st July 2009, 19:43   #1111 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ringwood
Posts: 4
Re Thomsons 2010 Schedule

Disappointing to see the Friday TFS Flight ditched in favour of a Tuesday One, I'm sure this years attractive flight times (Not !) had a lot to do with that decision, probably resulting in a low passenger numbers...Guess that leaves the door open for You Know who to start a Service.

Mind have you seen the Corfu flight times Dep - BOH 2055 Arrive back BOH 0405 ! Flight times from the Thomson Website.
Badgermanuk is offline   Reply
Old 5th July 2009, 16:36   #1112 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 30
The current state of the International arrivals hall - half expecting to see a tumbleweed going across!



Last edited by Sparkynufc : 5th July 2009 at 16:47.
Sparkynufc is online now   Reply
Old 5th July 2009, 16:43   #1113 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 30
and departures

Sparkynufc is online now   Reply
Old 6th July 2009, 19:42   #1114 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brighton uk
Posts: 148
Looks like British Midland are taking over the Onur Air flights to Dalaman this summer for Holiday company Holidays For You , first time British Midland have operated from Bournemouth

The departure time is 2020 on a Thursday and an arrival back into Bournemouth at a lovely 0540 on Friday am

Not sure what aircraft type is operating and where it is positioning in from though
MARKEYD is online now   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 17:16   #1115 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: planet earth
Posts: 60
id guess it would be an a320/21 from lhr
adfly is online now   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 19:27   #1116 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: castle donington
Posts: 7
Following the demise of Channel Airways in the 70's, British Midland were given temporary "custodian" rights to operate the scheduled service operation linking BOH with JER & GCI pending a full review by the ATLB as to who should get the route on a permanent basis.

Following the review, the Channel Islands route licence was awarded to Dan Air.

Whilst BD's presence was somewhat 'brief' - this year's DLM operation will not be their first (although accept it will be as the rebranded bmi)
gotaplan is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 02:41   #1117 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 140
Off topic

Would be great to see bmi regional ERJ-135's doing JER and GCI flights daily
shamrock7seal is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 06:46   #1118 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: 1 mile north of 26
Posts: 1,713
Looking at the photos departures doesn't seem to be a very wide building.
LTNman is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 09:40   #1119 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 77
LTNman

If you look back to post 1096 you can see how the new structure fits round the existing departures terminal making for a much wider terminal than it currently appears from the photos
BOU_PAX is offline   Reply
Old 10th July 2009, 20:53   #1120 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sunshine coast
Posts: 328
Terminal Progress

This is taken from the Bournemouth Echo website

Airport transformation still under way to tune of £45M (From Bournemouth Echo)
FLYboh is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".